Tracy E Macaulay1, Sarah Schaidle2, Nathan Wayne3. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone Street, TODD 223, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. Tracy.macaulay@uky.edu. 2. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 251 E. Huron Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. 3. Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15th Street, BI-2101, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the USA remains unacceptably high. The associated morbidity and mortality of CVD has important implications on our healthcare system and society. With much of CVD considered preventable an increase emphasis on primary prevention is important. To review the evidence for pharmacists providing CVD primary prevention, particularly as a part of employer-based programs. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-led 12-month preventative health program in 178 at-risk employees at University of British Columbia (UBC). Cardiovascular Assessment and Medication Management by Pharmacists at UBC (CAMMPUS) resulted in improved Framingham risk scores (FRS) from 11.7 to 10.7 (p = 0.0017), improvement in quality of life (p = 0.023), and medication adherence (p = 0.019). Findings are consistent with improvements observed in other pharmacist-led intervention trials but offer the unique perspective as an employer-based intervention. Pharmacists-led interventions prevent CVD through improvement in health markers and medication adherence. The ability of pharmacists to provide these as part of an employer-sponsored benefit might be favorable as other billing models for pharmacist can be challenging to be justified in a fee-for-service payment structure; further, there is incentive for employers to lower healthcare cost and improve productivity. Future studies defining the impact of pharmacists in this and other settings may have important public health implications.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the USA remains unacceptably high. The associated morbidity and mortality of CVD has important implications on our healthcare system and society. With much of CVD considered preventable an increase emphasis on primary prevention is important. To review the evidence for pharmacists providing CVD primary prevention, particularly as a part of employer-based programs. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-led 12-month preventative health program in 178 at-risk employees at University of British Columbia (UBC). Cardiovascular Assessment and Medication Management by Pharmacists at UBC (CAMMPUS) resulted in improved Framingham risk scores (FRS) from 11.7 to 10.7 (p = 0.0017), improvement in quality of life (p = 0.023), and medication adherence (p = 0.019). Findings are consistent with improvements observed in other pharmacist-led intervention trials but offer the unique perspective as an employer-based intervention. Pharmacists-led interventions prevent CVD through improvement in health markers and medication adherence. The ability of pharmacists to provide these as part of an employer-sponsored benefit might be favorable as other billing models for pharmacist can be challenging to be justified in a fee-for-service payment structure; further, there is incentive for employers to lower healthcare cost and improve productivity. Future studies defining the impact of pharmacists in this and other settings may have important public health implications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular disease; Employer-sponsored health benefit; Health prevention; Pharmacist; Risk modification; Wellness
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barbara Gobis; Anita I Kapanen; Jillian Reardon; Jason Min; Kathy H Li; Larry D Lynd; Peter J Zed Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2019-01-13 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jian Guan; Jay Khambhati; Lee W Jones; Alicia Morgans; Mohamad Allaf; David F Penson; Javid Moslehi Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven P Dunn; Kim K Birtcher; Craig J Beavers; William L Baker; Sara D Brouse; Robert L Page; Vera Bittner; Mary Norine Walsh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jonathan D Hoffman; Ramona Shayegani; Patrick M Spoutz; Ashley D Hillman; Jason P Smith; Daina L Wells; Sarah J Popish; Julianne E Himstreet; Jane M Manning; Mark Bounthavong; Melissa L D Christopher Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Date: 2020-07-31