Literature DB >> 32034295

The safety and feasibility of a new rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton for assisting individuals with lower extremity motor complete lesions following spinal cord injury (SCI): an observational study.

Xiao-Na Xiang1,2,3, Ming-Fu Ding1, Hui-Yan Zong1, Yan Liu1, Hong Cheng4, Cheng-Qi He5,6,7, Hong-Chen He8,9,10.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A pre-post observational study.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of a new rehabilitation robotic device for assisting individuals with lower extremity motor complete lesions following spinal cord injury (SCI).
SETTING: Three hospitals in Sichuan Province, China.
METHODS: Individuals aged 15-75 years with an SCI between vertebrae six (T6) and lumbar 1 (L1) and complete motor paralysis participated in an exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) programme (2 weeks, 5 days/week, 30 min/day). Data were collected pre-, mid- (week 1) and post-intervention (week 2).
RESULTS: Twenty-eight individuals (mean age = 41.3, 71% males) participated in the EAW programme. The distance walked during the 6-min walking test (6MWT) increased relative to that at baseline, during week 1 (13.0 ± 5.3 m) and week 2 (16.2 ± 5.3 m) when wearing the exoskeleton. The walking speed during the 10-m walking test (10MWT) increased from 0.039 ± 0.016 to 0.045 ± 0.016 m/s. The Hoffer walking ability grade, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), and the Walking Index for SCI II (WISCI II) changed after 2 weeks of EAW. No improvement in lower extremity motor score (LEMS) was observed. The rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were 21% and 4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The EAW programme with the new robotic exoskeleton provided potential meaningful improvements in mobility for individuals with SCI and had few adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32034295     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-0423-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

1.  Assistive powered exoskeleton for complete spinal cord injury: correlations between walking ability and exoskeleton control.

Authors:  Eleonora Guanziroli; Maurizio Cazzaniga; Laura Colombo; Sabrina Basilico; Giovanni Legnani; Franco Molteni
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 2.  Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anoushka Singh; Lindsay Tetreault; Suhkvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Aria Nouri; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 3.  Urinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Humberto R Vigil; Duane R Hickling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02
  3 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Sensors and Actuation Technologies in Exoskeletons: A Review.

Authors:  Monica Tiboni; Alberto Borboni; Fabien Vérité; Chiara Bregoli; Cinzia Amici
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Exoskeleton-assisted walking improves pulmonary function and walking parameters among individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Xiao-Na Xiang; Hui-Yan Zong; Yi Ou; Xi Yu; Hong Cheng; Chun-Ping Du; Hong-Chen He
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  The improvement of the lower limb exoskeletons on the gait of patients with spinal cord injury: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiali Xue; Xinwei Yang; Huan Tu; Wanna Liu; Dezhi Kong; Zhonghe Fan; Zhongyi Deng; Ning Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Knowledge Gaps in Biophysical Changes After Powered Robotic Exoskeleton Walking by Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christopher C H Yip; Chor-Yin Lam; Kenneth M C Cheung; Yat Wa Wong; Paul A Koljonen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Outcomes of Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Treated by Surgery and Their Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Xinfeng Wu; Qingpeng Song; Peihao Jin; Bo Liu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Comparison of Efficacy of Lokomat and Wearable Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lingjie Zhang; Fabin Lin; Lei Sun; Chunmei Chen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Physiotherapy using a free-standing robotic exoskeleton for patients with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nicola Postol; Neil J Spratt; Andrew Bivard; Jodie Marquez
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.