Literature DB >> 32034072

Rindopepimut with Bevacizumab for Patients with Relapsed EGFRvIII-Expressing Glioblastoma (ReACT): Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Phase II Trial.

David A Reardon1, Annick Desjardins2, James J Vredenburgh3, Donald M O'Rourke4, David D Tran5, Karen L Fink6, Louis B Nabors7, Gordon Li8, Daniela A Bota9, Rimas V Lukas10, Lynn S Ashby11, J Paul Duic12, Maciej M Mrugala13, Scott Cruickshank14, Laura Vitale15, Yi He15, Jennifer A Green15, Michael J Yellin15, Christopher D Turner15, Tibor Keler15, Thomas A Davis15, John H Sampson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rindopepimut is a vaccine targeting the tumor-specific EGF driver mutation, EGFRvIII. The ReACT study investigated whether the addition of rindopepimut to standard bevacizumab improved outcome for patients with relapsed, EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, phase II study (NCT01498328) conducted at 26 hospitals in the United States, bevacizumab-naïve patients with recurrent EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma were randomized to receive rindopepimut or a control injection of keyhole limpet hemocyanin, each concurrent with bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) by central review with a one-sided significance of 0.2.
RESULTS: Between May 2012 and 2014, 73 patients were randomized (36 rindopepimut, 37 control). Rindopepimut toxicity included transient, low-grade local reactions. As primary endpoint, PFS6 was 28% (10/36) for rindopepimut compared with 16% (6/37) for control (P = 0.12, one-sided). Secondary and exploratory endpoints also favored the rindopepimut group including a statistically significant survival advantage [HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.88; two-sided log-rank P = 0.01], a higher ORR [30% (9/30) vs. 18% (6/34; P = 0.38)], median duration of response [7.8 months (95% CI, 3.5-22.2) vs. 5.6 (95% CI, 3.7-7.4)], and ability to discontinue steroids for ≥6 months [33% (6/18) vs. 0% (0/19)]. Eighty percent of rindopepimut-treated patients achieved robust anti-EGFRvIII titers (≥1:12,800), which were associated with prolonged survival (HR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.45; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our randomized trial supports the potential for targeted immunotherapy among patients with GBM, but the therapeutic benefit requires validation due to the small sample size and potential heterogeneity of bevacizumab response among recurrent patients with GBM.See related commentary by Wick and Wagener, p. 1535. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32034072     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

1.  A troublesome burden, the amplification of EGFR in glioblastoma!

Authors:  Mina Lobbous; L Burt Nabors
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Next generation sequencing in adult patients with glioblastoma in Switzerland: a multi-centre decision analysis.

Authors:  A M Zeitlberger; P M Putora; S Hofer; P Schucht; D Migliorini; A F Hottinger; U Roelcke; H Läubli; P Spina; O Bozinov; M Weller; M C Neidert; T Hundsberger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Current WHO Guidelines and the Critical Role of Genetic Parameters in the Classification of Glioma: Opportunities for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Feng Yuan; Yingshuai Wang; Chiyuan Ma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 4.  Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Catherine McBain; Theresa A Lawrie; Ewelina Rogozińska; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Sarah Jefferies
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 5.  The current state of immunotherapy for primary and secondary brain tumors: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Takahide Nejo; Abigail Mende; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  Adrian Lee; Malmaruha Arasaratnam; David Lok Hang Chan; Mustafa Khasraw; Viive M Howell; Helen Wheeler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 7.  Targeting Neuroinflammation in Brain Cancer: Uncovering Mechanisms, Pharmacological Targets, and Neuropharmaceutical Developments.

Authors:  Mahmoud S Alghamri; Brandon L McClellan; Carson S Hartlage; Santiago Haase; Syed Mohd Faisal; Rohit Thalla; Ali Dabaja; Kaushik Banerjee; Stephen V Carney; Anzar A Mujeeb; Michael R Olin; James J Moon; Anna Schwendeman; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.988

8.  Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current progress, challenges and future outlook.

Authors:  Patrick C Gedeon; Cosette D Champion; Kristen E Rhodin; Karolina Woroniecka; Hanna R Kemeny; Alexa N Bramall; Joshua D Bernstock; Bryan D Choi; John H Sampson
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.045

Review 9.  Making a Cold Tumor Hot: The Role of Vaccines in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stephen C Frederico; John C Hancock; Emily E S Brettschneider; Nivedita M Ratnam; Mark R Gilbert; Masaki Terabe
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Current evidence and challenges of systematic therapies for adult recurrent glioblastoma: Results from clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenlin Chen; Delin Liu; Penghao Liu; Ziren Kong; Yaning Wang; Yu Wang; Wenbin Ma
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.026

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.