| Literature DB >> 32033955 |
Mark O'Dea1, David Jordan2, Sam Abraham3, Shafi Sahibzada1, Kylie Hewson4, Tanya Laird1, Rebecca Abraham1, Anthony Pavic5, Alec Truswell1, Terence Lee1.
Abstract
In a structured survey of all major chicken-meat producers in Australia, we investigated the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and genomic characteristics of Campylobacter jejuni (n = 108) and C. coli (n = 96) from cecal samples of chickens at slaughter (n = 200). The majority of the C. jejuni (63%) and C. coli (86.5%) samples were susceptible to all antimicrobials. Fluoroquinolone resistance was detected among both C. jejuni (14.8%) and C. coli (5.2%), although this only included three sequence types (STs) and one ST, respectively. Multidrug resistance among strains of C. jejuni (0.9%) and C. coli (4.1%) was rare, and fluoroquinolone resistance, when present, was never accompanied by resistance to any other agent. Comparative genome analysis demonstrated that Australian isolates were found dispersed on different branches/clusters within the international collection. The major fluoroquinolone-resistant STs of C. jejuni (ST7323, ST2083, and ST2343) and C. coli (ST860) present in Australian chickens were similar to those of international isolates and have been reported previously in humans and animals overseas. The detection of a subpopulation of Campylobacter isolates exclusively resistant to fluoroquinolone was unexpected since most critically important antimicrobials such as fluoroquinolones are excluded from use in Australian livestock. A number of factors, including the low level of resistance to other antimicrobials, the absence of fluoroquinolone use, the adoption of measures for preventing spread of contagion between flocks, and particularly the genomic identities of isolates, all point to humans, pest species, or wild birds as being the most plausible source of organisms. This study also demonstrates the need for vigilance in the form of surveillance for AMR based on robust sampling to manage AMR risks in the food chain.IMPORTANCE Campylobacter is one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis in humans, with infections frequently resulting from exposure to undercooked poultry products. Although human illness is typically self-limiting, a minority of cases do require antimicrobial therapy. Ensuring that Campylobacter originating from meat chickens does not acquire resistance to fluoroquinolones is therefore a valuable outcome for public health. Australia has never legalized the use of fluoroquinolones in commercial chickens and until now fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter has not been detected in the Australian poultry. This structured survey of meat chickens derived from all major Australian producers describes the unexpected emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Genetic characterization suggests that these isolates may have evolved outside the Australian poultry sector and were introduced into poultry by humans, pest species, or wild birds. The findings dramatically underline the critical role of biosecurity in the overall fight against antimicrobial resistance.Entities:
Keywords: AMR; Australia; Campylobacterzzm321990; Campylobacter coli; Campylobacter jejunizzm321990; antimicrobial resistance; chicken; fluoroquinolone; genome analysis; livestock
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033955 PMCID: PMC7117913 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02765-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1Antimicrobial resistance patterns for C. jejuni (n = 108) isolated from Australian meat chickens. The proportion susceptible is shown in blue, and the proportion resistant is shown in red.
FIG 2Antimicrobial resistance patterns for C. coli (n = 96) isolated from Australian meat chickens. The proportion susceptible is shown in blue, and the proportion resistant is shown in red.
Class-based antimicrobial resistance profiles of C. jejuni isolates (n = 108)
| Resistance profile | No. of resistances | No. of isolates | % of total |
|---|---|---|---|
| nil | 0 | 68 | 63.0 |
| qui | 1 | 16 | 14.8 |
| tet | 1 | 23 | 21.3 |
| lin_mac_tet | 4 | 1 | 0.9 |
mac, macrolides; nil, no resistance; qui, quinolones; lin, lincosamide; tet, tetracycline.
Class-based antimicrobial resistance profiles of C. coli isolates (n = 96)
| Resistance profile | No. of resistances | No. of isolates | % of total |
|---|---|---|---|
| nil | 0 | 83 | 86.5 |
| qui | 1 | 5 | 5.2 |
| tet | 1 | 3 | 3.1 |
| lin_mac | 5 | 5 | 5.2 |
mac, macrolides; nil, no resistance; qui, quinolones; lin, lincosamide; tet, tetracycline.
FIG 3Core genome phylogeny of the 105 Australian (blue) and 628 international collection (red) isolates of C. jejuni. The Australian isolates are dispersed on different branches, along with the international collection. The presence of two resistance genes (tet and blaOXA) found among isolates are indicated as black squares. Moreover, the Australian ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (ST2083 shown as purple squares) are found on the same node with a similar strain type from the international collection.
FIG 4Core genome phylogeny of the 82 Australian (blue) and 647 international collection (red) isolates of C. coli. The Australian isolates are found dispersed on different branches, along with the international collection. The presence of two resistance genes (tet and blaOXA) found among isolates are indicated as black squares. Moreover, the Australian ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (ST860 shown as purple squares) are found on the same node with a similar strain type from the international collection.