| Literature DB >> 32033567 |
Alfred Kwesi Manyeh1,2,3, Alberta Amu4,5, David Etsey Akpakli4,5, John E Williams4,5, Margaret Gyapong6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding practices in both the short and long term accrue to breastfed infants, mothers, families and the society at large. Despite the evidence of these benefits and adoption of various World Health Organization (WHO) strategies on promotion of exclusive breastfeeding by Ghana, the increase in the rate of exclusive breastfeeding has been very slow in the country. This study aimed to estimate the rate and investigate socio-economic and demographic determinants of 6 months exclusive breastfeeding in two rural districts in Southern Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Child health; Demographic surveillance; Dodowa; Exclusive breastfeeding; Ghana
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033567 PMCID: PMC7006185 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-020-0253-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Breastfeed J ISSN: 1746-4358 Impact factor: 3.461
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants
| Characteristics | Frequencya | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age group (in years) | ||
| < 20 | 231 | 12.4 |
| 20–24 | 424 | 22.7 |
| 25–29 | 483 | 25.8 |
| 30 + | 732 | 39.1 |
| Mean = 27.89 (sd = 7.15) | ||
| Ethnicity | ||
| Ga-Dangme | 1361 | 72.8 |
| Akan | 102 | 5.5 |
| Ewe | 287 | 15.4 |
| Mole- Dagbani | 106 | 5.7 |
| Other tribes | 14 | 0.8 |
| Religion | ||
| Christianity | 1706 | 91.2 |
| Islam | 119 | 6.4 |
| Traditional | 28 | 1.5 |
| Other religions | 17 | 0.9 |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployed | 388 | 20.8 |
| Farmer | 307 | 16.4 |
| Artisan | 219 | 11.7 |
| Trader | 594 | 31.8 |
| Civil servant | 33 | 1.8 |
| Student | 289 | 15.5 |
| Others | 40 | 2.1 |
| Level of education | ||
| No education | 693 | 37.1 |
| Primary | 284 | 15.2 |
| Junior high school level | 656 | 35.1 |
| Senior high school level and above | 237 | 12.7 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 543 | 29.5 |
| Married | 382 | 20.7 |
| Separated/divorced | 36 | 1.9 |
| Cohabiting | 882 | 47.9 |
| Sex of household head | ||
| Female | 730 | 39.0 |
| Male | 1140 | 61.0 |
| Household size | ||
| Less than six | 956 | 51.1 |
| More than five | 914 | 48.9 |
| Mean = 6.45 (SD = 4.33) | ||
| District of residence | ||
| Shai-Osudoku | 836 | 44.7 |
| Ningo-Prampram | 1034 | 55.3 |
| Parity | ||
| Parity 1 | 520 | 27.8 |
| Parity 2 | 429 | 22.9 |
| Parity 3 | 374 | 20.0 |
| Parity3+ | 547 | 29. |
| Delivery place | ||
| Health facility | 1332 | 71.23 |
| Outside health facility | 538 | 28.8 |
| Timing of ANC initiation | ||
| First trimester | 525 | 28.1 |
| Second trimester | 1196 | 64.0 |
| Third trimester | 147 | 7.9 |
| Babies age at time of interview | 0.5–1.6 years | |
| Breastfeeding type | ||
| Not exclusive | 543 | 29.0 |
| Exclusive | 1327 | 71.0 |
| Exclusive breastfeeding rate | ||
n = 1870; SD standard deviation a number of respondents across some categories may not add up to 1870 due to missing data
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of factors associated with 6 months exclusive breastfeeding
| Characteristics | Crude | Adjustedb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group (in years) | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
| < 20 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 20–24 | 1.24 (0.89, 1.74) | 0.205 | 1.46 (0.98, 2.15) | 0.060 |
| 25–29 | 1.53 (1.10, 2.13)a | 0.012 | 1.93 (1.25, 2.99)a | 0.003 |
| 30 + | 1.75 (1.28, 2.40)a | < 0.001 | 1.91 (1.91, 3.08)a | 0.007 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | 1.00 | |||
| Married | 1.22 (0.91, 1.63) | 0.193 | ||
| Separated/divorced | 0.83 (0.40, 1.70) | 0.606 | ||
| Cohabiting | 0.94 (0.74, 1.19) | 0.595 | ||
| Education | ||||
| No education | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 0.81 (0.62, 1.05) | 0.110 | ||
| Junior school level | 1.03 (0.79, 1.34) | 0.844 | ||
| SHS and above | 1.08 (0.73, 1.61) | 0.694 | ||
| Occupation | ||||
| Unemployed | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Farmer | 1.77 (1.23, 2.55)a | 0.002 | 1.24 (0.82, 1.87) | 0.296 |
| Artisan | 0.70 (0.49, 1.00)a | 0.049 | 0.64 (0.43, 0.96)a | 0.032 |
| Trader | 0.91 (0.69, 1.21) | 0.512 | 1.04 (0.76, 1.43) | 0.805 |
| Civil servant | 0.91 (0.42, 1.97) | 0.812 | 0.66 (0.28, 1.58) | 0.350 |
| Student | 0.82 (0.59, 1.14) | 0.242 | 1.04 (0.71, 1.53) | 0.838 |
| Others | 0.73 (0.37, 1.46) | 0.379 | 0.89 (0.42, 1.85) | 0.750 |
| Delivery place | ||||
| Health facility | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Outside health facility | 1.51 (1.20, 1.90)a | < 0.001 | 1.13 (0.87, 1.46) | 0.367 |
| Parity | ||||
| Parity 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Parity 2 | 0.91 (0.79, 1.36) | 0.793 | 0.91 (0.66, 1.26) | 0.593 |
| Parity 3 | 1.17 (0.88, 1.56) | 0.285 | 0.95 (0.66, 1.38) | 0.802 |
| Parity 3+ | 1.56 (1.19, 2.04)a | 0.001 | 1.12 (0.75, 1.66) | 0.585 |
| Household size | ||||
| Less than six | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| More than five | 1.33 (1.09, 1.63)a | 0.005 | 1.45 (1.16, 1.81)a | 0.001 |
| Socio-economic status | ||||
| Poorest | 1.00 | |||
| Poorer | 1.04 (0.76, 1.43) | 0.809 | ||
| Poor | 1.09 (0.79, 1.49) | 0.611 | ||
| Less poor | 1.02 (0.75, 1.40) | 0.891 | ||
| Least poor | 0.95 (0.69, 1.30) | 0.749 | ||
| Timing of ANC | ||||
| First trimester | 1.00 | |||
| Second trimester | 1.16 (0.93, 1.45) | 0.184 | ||
| Third trimester | 1.27 (0.84, 1.91) | 0.254 | ||
| Sex of household head | ||||
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Male | 1.44 (1.18, 1.77)a | < 0.001 | 1.19 (0.95, 1.49) | 0.124 |
| District of residence | ||||
| Shai-Osudoku | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Ningo-Prampram | 1.16 (0.12, 0.21)a | < 0.001 | 0.15 (0.1, 0.20)a | < 0.001 |
CI confidence interval, COR crude odd ratio, AOR adjusted odd ratio, astatistically significant. b Correct classification rate of the model = 72.8%