Literature DB >> 32033526

Exploring naturally occurring clinical subgroups of post-traumatic headache.

T L H Chan1, Y W Woldeamanuel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore naturally occurring clinical subgroups of post-traumatic headache.
BACKGROUND: Persistent post-traumatic headache (PTH) is defined as a headache developing within 7 days of an injury that lasts for greater than 3 months. However, there is no evidence available from the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) based classification between persistent and acute PTH based on clinical phenotypes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the Stanford Research Repository Cohort Discovery Tool. We reviewed 500 electronic patient charts between January 2015 to September 2019 using inclusion criteria of adults older than 18 years with a diagnosis of PTH. The following variables were extracted from each patient's chart: diagnosis of PTH as dependent variable, and predictor variables as age, sex, history of migraine, loss of consciousness during head injury, pre-existing psychological history, duration of PTH and new PTH-associated comorbidities (e.g. new onset vertigo, post-traumatic stress disorder). Logistic regression was employed to identify clinical phenotypes predicting persistent PTH. All predictor variables were tested in one block to determine their predictive capacity while controlling for other predictors in the model. Two-step cluster analysis was conducted to identify naturally occurring PTH subgroups.
RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were included (150 acute, 150 persistent PTH) with a median age of 47 years (IQR 31, 59) and female: male ratio of 2.7:1. Two hundred patients were excluded due to misdiagnoses. Pre-existing psychological history (standardized beta 0.16), history of migraine (0.20), new PTH-associated comorbidities (0.23) and medication overuse (0.37) statistically significantly predicted the presence of persistent PTH (p <  0.0001). Clustering analysis revealed PTH subgrouping comparable to ICHD-based classification: 140 patients in Cluster 1 (76% persistent PTH) and 160 patients in Cluster 2 (83% acute PTH). Four distinct clusters were found within persistent PTH.
CONCLUSION: Pre-existing psychological history, history of migraine, new PTH-associated comorbidities and medication overuse predicted the occurrence of persistent PTH as well as two naturally occurring PTH clusters correlating to acute and persistent PTH. Management emphasis should focus on these phenotypes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute post-traumatic headache; Headache attributable to traumatic injury to the head and/or neck; Persistent post-traumatic headache; Post-traumatic headache; Post-traumatic headache disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32033526      PMCID: PMC7006085          DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-1080-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Headache Pain        ISSN: 1129-2369            Impact factor:   7.277


Introduction

Headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head [1] also known as post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common condition following injury to the head and/or neck. The prognosis is generally favorable with most cases resolving within 3–6 months of the inciting injury [2]. However, it is reported that 18–22% of PTH last for more than 1 year [3]. PTH is a poorly understood entity. According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3): It is defined as any headache related to a traumatic injury to the head and/or neck with headache being reported within 7 days [1]. Little is known about the pathophysiology of PTH: A number of factors have been suggested including microglial activation in the brain parenchyma, dural inflammation related to mast cell degranulation with sensitization of pain pathways, injury to the extracranial tissues and direct damage to neuronal and brain structures [4]. The diagnosis of acute versus persistent PTH is based on an arbitrary cutoff selection of 3 months of headache duration, greater than 3 months for persistent PTH and lesser than 3 months for acute PTH [1]. Limited evidence has looked into the factors associated with the transformation of acute to persistent PTH. A prior population-based study identified that history of traumatic brain injury, being injured under the influence of alcohol, and history of acute PTH were predictors for persistent PTH [5]. PTH is also associated with somatic, cognitive and psychological symptoms [6]. It is known that there is a bidirectional association between headache and psychiatric disorders [7, 8]. Anxiety, depression, affective temperamental dysregulation and suicidal behavior may be seen in patients with chronic headache disorders [6, 8, 9]. In the diagnosis of PTH, the possibility of co-occurring medication overuse headache (MOH) is an important consideration as well [10]. Based on this information, we wanted to test the hypothesis that exposure to clinical predictors, such as medication overuse and psychological symptoms are associated with persistent PTH compared to acute PTH. In addition, we hypothesized that there exists naturally occurring heterogeneous clusters within the persistent PTH group of patients. In this hospital-based study, we explored the clinical predictors that may be more likely associated with persistent versus acute PTH. Identifying potential clinical predictors may have treatment implications and provide a plausible explanation as to why some patients develop persistent headaches after an injury to the head and/or neck. In addition, we conducted clustering analysis to identify naturally-occurring subgroups of PTH and compare them with ICHD-3 classification of acute versus persistent.

Methods

Study design

This was a case-referent retrospective chart review determining clinical predictors which accounted for persistent PTH (cases) in comparison to acute PTH (referents).

Study setting

Charts were identified using the Stanford Research Repository Cohort Discovery (STARR) Tool - an online tool designed for chart identification and review. Search terms included “post-traumatic headache” and “headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head and/or neck” and “concussion” and “traumatic brain injury”. Patients were seen at Stanford-affiliated clinics i.e. Stanford Headache Clinic, Stanford Neurology Clinic, Stanford Pain Clinic, Stanford Concussion Clinic. The study period spanned between January 1, 2015 to September 31, 2019.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

A total of 500 electronic patient charts were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of PTH. Children younger than 18 years, patients without PTH diagnosis, and charts with limited information were excluded. Children were excluded since confounding effect from the developing brain will make it challenging to interpret results from our study design.

Data extraction

In addition to PTH diagnosis (acute and persistent), the following variables were extracted from each patient’s chart: age, sex, history of migraine, loss of consciousness during head injury, cause of head injury (e.g. fall, being hit with an object, car accident), pre-existing psychological history, duration of PTH, new PTH-associated comorbidities (e.g. new onset vertigo, post-traumatic stress disorder), and medication overuse. Operational definition of medication overuse was employed based on ICHD-3 criteria [1] for frequency of medications overused in medication overuse headache.

Sample size estimation

Sample size was estimated a priori using linear multiple regression on F tests. A total of 295 patients was required to achieve 80% power involving 8 predictor variables with α error probability of 0.05 and small effect size f2 of 0.05. The final sample size was made 300 patients. G*Power 3.1 (Universität Düsseldorf) software was used to compute sample size [11].

Ethical approval

This study received approval from Stanford University Institutional Review Board (eProtocol#: 52404, IRB 61, Registration 4947).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to describe and interpret data, respectively. Since our study was a retrospective design, odds ratio (OR) statistics were used to measure the odds of having persistent versus acute PTH in those presenting with different clinical variables (e.g. history of migraine, pre-existing psychological history, medication overuse, new PTH-associated comorbidities). Where OR was inflated, relative risk (RR) was used. Logistic regression was employed to identify clinical phenotypes predicting persistent PTH. Predictor variables (age, sex, loss of consciousness, history of migraine, pre-existing psychological history, new PTH-associated comorbidities, repeated head injuries, medication overuse) were tested in one block to determine their predictive capacity while controlling for other predictors in the model. The regression model’s goodness-of-fit was tested using Cox & Snell R [2], Nagelkerke R [2], and Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Significance threshold was corrected for multiple testing by dividing two-tailed p-value of 0.05 to 8, resulting in a new p-value of 0.006. In addition, two-step cluster analysis was utilized to identify naturally occurring PTH classification. Two-step cluster analysis was selected since the data were mostly categorical. Clustering criterion was Schwarz’s Bayesian Criterion, and the log-likelihood distance measure was applied. Number of clusters were determined automatically. Continuous variables (e.g. age) were normalized. Missing data were handled by listwise deletion. SPSS version 21 [12] was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Included and excluded patients

Of the 500 PTH patient charts screened, 300 were included in the final study sample involving 150 acute and 150 persistent PTH. Median age of the total included sample was 47 years (IQR 31, 59) and female:male ratio was 2.7:1. Of the 200 patients excluded, there was limited information on 95 (47.5%) patients, 16 (8%) had migraine only, and the remaining 89 (44.5%) had a different diagnosis (e.g. cerebrospinal fluid leak, brain tumor, sinus infection, intracranial abscess, meningitis, cerebral aneurysm).

Comparison between acute and persistent PTH patients (Table 1)

There was no statistically significant difference in median age between the acute (44 years, IQR 28, 59) and persistent (50 years (36, 58)) PTH group (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.16). Similarly, the female:male ratio was comparable between the acute (2.8) and persistent (2.5) PTH groups with no statistically significant difference (chi-squared test, p = 0.60). Median duration of PTH was 0.7 months (IQR 0.23, 1) in acute and 24 months (12, 48) in persistent PTH patients (Mann-Whitney test, p <  0.0001). Fifty-nine (40%) persistent PTH patients had a history of migraine compared to only 8 (5%) acute PTH patients (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 2, 3; p <  0.0001). With the patients who were diagnosed with persistent PTH and a history of migraine, it was documented that they had at least 2 fold increase in frequency and/or intensity of their headaches after their injury. History of repeated head injury was seen in 37 (25%) of the persistent PTH patients compared to only 8 (5%) of the acute PTH patients (OR = 5.8, 95% CI 2.6, 13; p <  0.0001). Twelve (8%) acute PTH patients suffered loss of consciousness compared to 32 (21%) persistent PTH patients (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5, 6.3; p = 0.0016). Only 1 (0.007%) acute PTH patient had medication overuse in contrast to 58 (39%) patients in the persistent PTH group (RR = 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2, 3.0; p < 0.0001). Pre-existing psychological history (e.g. depression, anxiety, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder) was found in 27 (18%) patients of the acute PTH group compared to 78 (52%) patients in the persistent PTH (OR = 5, 95% CI 3, 8.3; p < 0.0001). New PTH-associated comorbidities (e.g. vertigo, neck pain, imbalance) were seen in 103 (69%) acute PTH patients compared to 147 (98%) patients in the persistent PTH group (RR = 9.8, 95% CI 3.3, 29.5; p < 0.0001). All patients with acute PTH had complete resolution of their headache within 3 months of headache onset. Only 5 persistent PTH patients had complete resolution of their headache within a median duration of 9 months (IQR 6, 12). Overall, there was a 5% missing data which was excluded from analysis. Clinical features of acute and persistent PTH patients included in the study Mann-Whitney < 0.00001 RR = 2.4 95% CI 2, 3 < 0.0001 OR = 5.8 95% CI 2.6, 13 < 0.0001 OR = 3.1 95% CI: 1.5, 6.3 = 0.0016 RR = 2.6 95% CI: 2.2, 3.0 < 0.0001 OR = 5 95% CI 3, 8.3 < 0.0001 RR = 9.8 95% CI 3.3, 29.5 < 0.0001 Abbreviations: IQR interquartile range, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk, CI confidence interval. Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Cause of head trauma (Table 2)

Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) was the cause of head trauma in 25 (16%) acute PTH patients compared to 46 (31%) patients in the persistent PTH group (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.8; p = 0.0048). There was no statistically significant difference in fall injury as cause of head trauma between the acute and persistent PTH groups (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5, 1.2; p = 0.35). Both acute and persistent PTH groups had similar prevalence of being hit by an object as cause of head trauma (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5, 1.2; p = 0.26). Causes of head injury in the acute and persistent PTH group OR = 2.2 95% CI 1.3, 3.8 = 0.0048 OR = 0.8 95% CI 0.5, 1.2 p = 0.35 OR = 0.8 95% CI 0.5, 1.2 p = 0.26 OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Source of diagnosis (Table 3)

Diagnosis was made by headache specialists in the majority of persistent PTH patients (39%), while most of the acute PTH were diagnosed by emergency room physician (47%). Provider who diagnosed acute and persistent PTH Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Logistic regression (Table 4)

Logistic regression showed that pre-existing psychological history (standardized beta 0.16), history of migraine (0.20), new PTH-associated comorbidities (0.23) and medication overuse (0.37) statistically significantly predicted the presence of persistent PTH (p < 0.0001). Duration of persistent PTH did not impact other clinical variables. Goodness-of-fit statistics showed the predictive capacity of the model was fit and appropriate (Cox & Snell R square 0.46, Nagelkerke R square 0.61, Hosmer and Lemeshow test p = 0.34). Logistic regression results Dependent variable was acute or persistent PTH, while independent variables were age, sex, history of migraine (MigHis), loss of consciousness during head injury (LOC), previous head injury (PrevHI), medication overuse (MO), pre-existing psychological history (PPH), and new PTH-associated comorbidities (NewCom). Variables in bold font were found to statistically significantly contribute to the prevalence of persistent PTH. Results are displayed using unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients (β), odds ratio (OR), and p-values

Head imaging

In the persistent PTH patients, head imaging was done in 143 (95%) - of which 33 (23%) had findings (skull and/or facial bone fractures, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid and/or intracerebral hemorrhage, encephalomalacia), and the rest 110 (77%) had normal head imaging results. In the acute PTH patients, 75 (50%) had head imaging - of which 60 (80%) showed normal findings and the remaining 15 (20%) had skull and/or facial fractures, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid and/or intracerebral hemorrhage (Chi-squared = 0.27, p = 0.60).

Two-step cluster analysis (Figs. 1 and 2)

Two-step cluster analysis results revealed 2 clusters of PTH i.e. 140 (46.7%) patients assembled in Cluster 1 and 160 (53.7%) patients in Cluster 2. 106 (76%) of Cluster 1 patients had persistent PTH while 133 (83%) of Cluster 2 patients had acute PTH. Cluster 1 PTH patients had higher prevalence of a history of migraine, medication overuse, pre-existing psychological history, new PTH-associated comorbidities, history of repeated head injury compared to Cluster 2 PTH patients. History of migraine, higher level of medication overuse and pre-existing psychological history ranked as the top 3 predictors of Cluster 1 from Cluster 2. Four clusters of persistent PTH patients were identified. Cluster 1 had the lowest prevalence of a history of migraine. Cluster 2 featured the highest level of pre-existing psychological history, medication overuse, history of migraine, loss of consciousness, and the longest PTH duration (median 30 months). Cluster 3 had the shortest PTH duration (median 24 months) and the lowest prevalence of loss of consciousness. Cluster 4 exhibited the lowest prevalence of new PTH-associated comorbidities and head injuries. Pre-existing psychological history, medication overuse, and history of migraine ranked as the top 3 predictors of the clusters. PTH clusters. Two PTH clusters were identified (a). Cluster 1 contained 140 (46.7%) patients and 160 (53.7%) patients assembled in Cluster 2 (a). One hundred and six (76%) Cluster 1 patients had persistent PTH while 133 (83%) of Cluster 2 patients had acute PTH. Compared to Cluster 2 patients, Cluster 1 PTH patients had higher prevalence of a history of migraine (MigHis), medication overuse (MO), pre-existing psychological history (PPH), new PTH-associated comorbidities (NewCom), history of repeated head injuries (PrevHI) compared to Cluster 2 PTH patients (a). The top 3 important predictors were a history of migraine, higher level of medication overuse and pre-existing psychological history (b). The bars in a show relative distribution of the different clinical variables - with the right bar in each cluster representing present clinical variable while the left bar is for absent variable. For example, the first row for history of migraine (MigHis) shows that Cluster 1 had relatively higher prevalence compared to Cluster 2. The seven bars in previous head injury (PrevHI) represent frequency of head injuries ranging from 0 (left) to 7 (right) under each cluster; there were more patients with more frequent head injuries in Cluster 1 compared to Cluster 2. Age distribution is shown ranging from 18 (left) to 90 (right) years. For sex, left bars represent males while right bars represent females Clusters within persistent PTH patients. Four clusters of persistent PTH patients were identified (a). Under each cluster column, the following clinical variables were coded as “present” and “absent”: PPH_P (previous psychological history in persistent PTH), MO (medication overuse), MigHis (migraine history), PMH (previous medical history), LOC (loss of consciousness), NewCom (new comorbidities). “Present” is depicted by the left bars under each cluster column, while “absent” is represented by the right bars. For sex, left bars represent males while right bars represent females. The seven bars in previous head injury (PrevHI) represent frequency of head injuries found ranging from 0 (left) to 7 (right). Age distribution is shown ranging from 18 (left) to 90 (right) years. Cluster 1 had the lowest prevalence of a history of migraine (i.e. highest bar for “absent” MigHis). Cluster 2 featured the highest level of pre-existing psychological history, medication overuse, history of migraine, loss of consciousness, and the longest PTH duration (median 30 months). Cluster 3 had the shortest PTH duration (median 24 months) and the lowest prevalence of loss of consciousness. Cluster 4 exhibited the lowest prevalence of new PTH-associated comorbidities and head injuries (a). The top 3 important predictors in descending order were pre-existing psychological history, medication overuse, and history of migraine (b)

Discussion

In this study, pre-existing psychological history, history of migraine, new PTH-associated comorbidities and medication overuse predicted the occurrence of persistent PTH. Previous studies have suggested that a previous history of headache, less severe injury, female gender and the presence of comorbid psychiatric disorders are associated with PTH [5, 7, 13–16]. However, these studies did not specify who made the diagnosis and the details on their previous headache history, including their headache diagnosis, duration, frequency and/or intensity. In our study, the diagnostic accuracy for the persistent PTH group was high since 58% of them were made by neurologists and headache specialists (Table 2). Our study reflects the real word setting where acute PTH is often seen and managed by primary care physicians including family medicine, internal medicine and emergency room physicians. When PTH becomes persistent and refractory to treatment, they are referred to specialty clinics. Based on the ICHD diagnostic criteria, PTH can only be diagnosed in the setting of migraine if patients have at least 2 fold increase in frequency and/or intensity of their headaches after their injury [1]. This information was documented within the persistent PTH group. Our study found that the duration of persistent PTH did not impact other clinical variables. This may be related to trigeminal neuroplasticity and central sensitization seen in prolonged PTH [17-19].
Table 2

Causes of head injury in the acute and persistent PTH group

Cause of Head InjuryAcute PTHPersistent PTHStatistical Difference
Motor Vehicle Accident: n (%)25 (16%)46 (31%)

OR = 2.2

95% CI 1.3, 3.8

p = 0.0048

Fall: n (%)65 (44%)57 (38%)

OR = 0.8

95% CI 0.5, 1.2

p = 0.35

Direct trauma to the head by an object: n (%)60 (40%)47 (31%)

OR = 0.8

95% CI 0.5, 1.2

p = 0.26

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Our clustering analysis revealed two naturally occurring PTH clusters which highly correlated with ICHD-based acute versus persistent PTH classification. Cluster 1 represented the majority of persistent PTH while Cluster 2 represented the majority of acute PTH patients. A history of migraine, medication overuse, pre-existing psychological history, new PTH-associated comorbidities ranked as the top 4 classifying clinical variables in descending order. Cluster 1 phenotype was burdened with high levels of these 4 clinical variables compared to Cluster 2. That our clustering results mostly corroborated with ICHD-based classification provides evidence base for acute versus persistent PTH subgroups. Our findings of four naturally occurring clusters within the persistent PTH group shows the presence of distinct persistent PTH profiles. This proves that not all persistent PTH patients are similar, and thus cannot be placed under an umbrella classification of “persistent PTH”. Some persistent PTH patients may have resolution within 2 years (i.e., Cluster 3) while others may have longer duration, higher psychological burden, and medication overuse (i.e., Cluster 2). Identifying these naturally occurring PTH clusters is important for providing personalized clinical management as well as for conducting precise clinical trials, since different patients may respond differently as per their baseline distinct cluster characteristics. There are a few possible pathophysiological mechanisms to explain the development of the four different clusters of persistent PTH: Cluster 1, in contrast to Cluster 2 was found to have the lowest migraine prevalence with low levels of psychological comorbidity and medication overuse while featuring moderate levels of new PTH-associated comorbidities may indicate uncontaminated phenotype of persistent PTH. Studying this phenotype may reveal distinct PTH-specific neuroanatomic regions involved e.g. dysfunctional inhibitory pathways which follow pericranial tissue injury [20]. Cluster 1 persistent PTH phenotype may explain whether PTH has a different mechanism compared to perturbed sensory processing and subcortical aminergic modulatory pathways described in migraine [21, 22]. Cluster 2 PTH patients may be exhibiting pronounced neuroinflammation, and increased peripheral and central sensitization, as shown by protracted migraine history and psychological comorbidities. Studies have shown that patients recovering from unconscious states can have long term chronic pain experiences due to aberrant limbic and trigemino-amygdalar pathways [23-27]. This may explain our finding of Cluster 3 patients featuring the shortest PTH duration along with the lowest prevalence of loss of consciousness. Likewise, Cluster 2 patients having correlation of higher prevalence of loss of consciousness and longer PTH duration supports this speculation. Cluster 4 patients seemed to signify the direct relationship between frequency of head injuries and new PTH-associated comorbidities. Cluster 4 persistent PTH patients may also be having increased natural tolerance to pain behavior as evidenced by the cluster’s relatively lower prevalence of psychological comorbidity, medication overuse, and migraine history. The overuse of abortive headache medications may contribute to the chronicity of headache after a head injury. A study conducted at the Danish Headache Center showed that 42% of patients who fulfilled the criteria for PTH at the time of referral also fulfilled the criteria for MOH [10]. This may suggest a percentage of patients with persistent PTH may have MOH rather than true persistent PTH and refractory headache in persistent PTH may be partly caused by MOH. Prospective studies are required to explore if medication overuse is a confounding factor and/or play a role in promoting chronicity in patients with PTH. A previous published study demonstrated that migraine patients are more prone to develop MOH compared to patients with other headache types such as cluster headache [28]. This increased susceptibility may explain why migraine and medication overuse predicted the occurrence of persistent PTH in our study. Furthermore, continuous intake of acute headache medications may alter descending inhibitory pathways that are thought to be important mechanisms in PTH [20]. A previous published study showed that individuals with a history of headache, such as migraine were significantly more likely to report headaches both acutely and chronically after a traumatic head injury compared to those without a history of headaches [29]. This suggests that a history of headache may predispose patients in developing persistent PTH after a head injury. Although the pathophysiology of PTH is not completely understood, the proposed mechanism of impaired descending neuromodulation, activation of trigeminal and cervical afferents, neurometabolic changes, cortical spreading depression, calcitonin gene-related peptide dependent mechanisms and neuroinflammation overlap with the migraine entity [30]. One would suspect after further injury to the head and/or neck, the underlying process would be intensified. Previous report has suggested that the occurrence of PTH after mild brain injury was not related to the type of injury [14]. However, in our study, motor vehicle accidents are associated with the persistent PTH group (Table 1). This may suggest the development of other comorbidities from a motor vehicle accident, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, vestibular dysfunction and neck injury. Patients within the two PTH groups had mild traumatic brain injury. Headache prevalence and severity have been reported to be greater in those with mild head injury compared to those with more severe head injury 13 . it is unclear why this inverse dose response relationship is seen, and further investigation is warranted.
Table 1

Clinical features of acute and persistent PTH patients included in the study

Clinical VariablesAcute PTH (n = 150)Persistent PTH (n = 150)Statistical Difference
Age, years: median (IQR)44 (28, 59)50 (36, 58)Mann-Whitney p = 0.16
Female:Male ratio2.82.5Chi-squared p = 0.60
Duration of PTH, months: median (IQR)0.7 (0.23, 1)24 (12, 48)

Mann-Whitney

p < 0.00001

History of migraine: n (%)8 (5%)59 (40%)

RR = 2.4

95% CI 2, 3

p < 0.0001

Previous head injury: n (%)8 (5%)37 (25%)

OR = 5.8

95% CI 2.6, 13

p < 0.0001

Loss of consciousness: n (%)12 (8%)32 (21%)

OR = 3.1

95% CI: 1.5, 6.3

p = 0.0016

Medication overuse: n (%)1 (0.007%)58 (39%)

RR = 2.6

95% CI: 2.2, 3.0

p < 0.0001

Pre-existing psychological history: n (%)27 (18%)78 (52%)

OR = 5

95% CI 3, 8.3

p < 0.0001

New PTH-associated comorbidities: n (%)103 (69%)147 (98%)

RR = 9.8

95% CI 3.3, 29.5

p < 0.0001

Abbreviations: IQR interquartile range, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk, CI confidence interval. Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Rarely does headache occur in isolation in closed head injury and other comorbidities are often seen. From our study, patients in the persistent PTH group suffered from multiple new PTH-associated comorbidities, including neck pain, vertigo, back pain, autonomic disturbance, anxiety, depression and cognitive impairment. Neck pain is one of the most common associated symptoms/comorbidities in the persistent PTH group: 70 out of the 150 patients (46%) had neck pain. The injured cervical structures could, in addition to causing neck pain, refer pain to the head due to a close relationship between the upper cervical inputs and the trigeminal system [31]. Hooten et al. has demonstrated significant reduction in headache frequency, intensity and neck pain after 12 months of exercise therapy for patients with a history of cervicogenic headaches, which may be part of the phenotype seen in PTH [32]. Thus, treatment on the neck, such as neck physical therapy may benefit PTH. A pre-existing psychological history, including depression, anxiety, bipolar disease, post-traumatic stress orders were associated with the development of persistent PTH. Epidemiological and functional imaging studies suggest that a directional relationship exists between chronic pain and mental health disorders [32]. Stilling et al. has shown a significant reduction in depression rating and headache frequency after 1 month of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and rTMS is an FDA approved treatment for depression [33]. The alteration of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine have a major role in pain modulation [32]. With better mental health, one would be able to be more active and practice good lifestyle routines. These measures can lead to a good clinical outcome in patients with headache [34, 35]. To note, two hundred patients were excluded in this study suggesting the diagnostic criteria of PTH may be an unfamiliar entity amongst healthcare providers. In addition, this may indicate STARR tool may give rise to false positive PTH identifications. The STARR identification was 60% accurate (300 out of 500 patients), which is an acceptable percentage based on a simple word-based patient search. Further education is required for providers who manage PTH, because a misdiagnosis may alter the management plan and have litigation implications. Strengths of this study include application of robust statistical tests, with adequate goodness-of-fit regression models, adjustment for confounders, examination of multiple headache-related variables. More than 58% of the persistent PTH patients were diagnosed by neurologists or headache specialists (Table 2). Our limitations included the following: The precise time of headache resolution or improvement was unavailable within the acute PTH group. Acute PTH results were based on patients not reporting headaches at their next physician visit (less than 3 months). Some information was not available including lifestyle routine changes, and details on allied health involvement and this was inherent to the retrospective study. Acute PTH was diagnosed mainly by general practitioners or emergency room physicians who may not be familiar with the diagnostic criteria of PTH. Assessment of pre-injury headache suffering may be influenced by recall problems. Our hospital-based study may not be representative of the general PTH population. Our results may not be valid for all age groups since we only studied participants from age greater than 18 years old. A causation could not be established from our results, rather association only. Although a previous clinical-based study in PTH patients reported higher prevalence of tension-type headache than migraine [10], tension-type headache was rarely documented or labeled as a pre-existing diagnosis in our study. Our speculation is that tension-type headache may not be a common referral to our center. Besides, tension-type headache is thought to be more common in community-based studies than in clinical-based studies [36, 37]. Hence, our clinical-based study setting may not give the true population burden of pre-existing tension-type headache in PTH patients.

Conclusion and future direction

A pre-existing psychological history, history of migraine, new PTH-associated comorbidities and medication overuse predicted the occurrence of persistent PTH. Our study has raised a few interesting questions: Would there be a difference in clinical outcome between patients who have medication overuse versus no medication overuse in the development of PTH. Pre-existing psychological history, history of migraine, new PTH-associated comorbidities and medication overuse were found to be associated with persistent PTH. These clinical variables should be targeted as part of early treatment plan since managing these variables may impact PTH prognosis and recovery. Future prospective studies are needed to further validate our results. In addition, our study showed that data-driven classification can perform accurately correlating to ICHD-based PTH subclasses - hence providing evidence based for ICHD classification. In the future, machine learning tools can be developed based on our clustering results using clinical variables such as pre-existing psychological history, history of migraine, new PTH-associated comorbidities and medication overuse. Also, it could be useful to develop a specific score for predicting patients at risk of developing persistent PTH, instead of using non-specific assessment tools such as the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT3) [38].
Table 3

Provider who diagnosed acute and persistent PTH

ProviderAcute PTH n (%)Persistent PTH n (%)Chi-squared p-value
Headache Specialist1 (0.7%)58 (39%)< 0.000001
Neurology4 (2.7%)28 (19%)0.000007
Pain Clinic0 (0%)18 (12%)N/A
Family Medicine29 (19.3%)9 (6%)0.0005
Internal Medicine23 (15.3%)5 (3.3%)0.0003
Emergency Room Physician70 (47%)3 (2%)< 0.000001
Sports Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Concussion Clinic23 (15.3%)29 (19.3%)0.36

Statistically significant differences are displayed in bold

Table 4

Logistic regression results

β unstandardizedβ standardizedOR (95% CI) standardizedp-value
Age0.230.061.06 (0.98, 2.65)0.175
Sex−0.25−0.060.94 (0.87, 2.39)0.117
MigHis0.810.201.22 (1.11, 3.04)0
LOC0.330.081.08 (1.00, 2.71)0.056
PrevHI0.650.161.17 (1.03, 2.80)0.018
MO1.500.371.44 (1.18, 3.26)0
PPH0.650.161.17 (1.08, 2.94)0
NewCom0.960.231.26 (1.12, 3.06)0

Dependent variable was acute or persistent PTH, while independent variables were age, sex, history of migraine (MigHis), loss of consciousness during head injury (LOC), previous head injury (PrevHI), medication overuse (MO), pre-existing psychological history (PPH), and new PTH-associated comorbidities (NewCom). Variables in bold font were found to statistically significantly contribute to the prevalence of persistent PTH. Results are displayed using unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients (β), odds ratio (OR), and p-values

  35 in total

1.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.

Authors:  J S Morris; A Ohman; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after acute lung injury: a 2-year prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  O J Bienvenu; J Gellar; B M Althouse; E Colantuoni; T Sricharoenchai; P A Mendez-Tellez; C Shanholtz; C R Dennison; P J Pronovost; D M Needham
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Natural history of headache after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jeanne M Hoffman; Sylvia Lucas; Sureyya Dikmen; Cynthia A Braden; Allen W Brown; Robert Brunner; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; William C Walker; Thomas K Watanabe; Kathleen R Bell
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Consensus statement on concussion in sport--the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012.

Authors:  Paul McCrory; Willem H Meeuwisse; Mark Aubry; Robert C Cantu; Jiří Dvořák; Ruben J Echemendia; Lars Engebretsen; Karen M Johnston; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Martin Raftery; Allen Sills; Brian W Benson; Gavin A Davis; Richard Ellenbogen; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stanley A Herring; Grant L Iverson; Barry D Jordan; James Kissick; Michael McCrea; Andrew S McIntosh; David L Maddocks; Michael Makdissi; Laura Purcell; Margot Putukian; Kathryn Schneider; Charles H Tator; Michael Turner
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 6.  Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Philip R Holland; Margarida Martins-Oliveira; Jan Hoffmann; Christoph Schankin; Simon Akerman
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Increased responses in trigeminocervical nociceptive neurons to cervical input after stimulation of the dura mater.

Authors:  T Bartsch; P J Goadsby
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Post-traumatic headaches in civilians and military personnel: a comparative, clinical review.

Authors:  Brett Theeler; Sylvia Lucas; Ronald G Riechers; Robert L Ruff
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  Tension type headache.

Authors:  Debashish Chowdhury
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.383

10.  Headache following head injury: a population-based longitudinal cohort study (HUNT).

Authors:  Lena Hoem Nordhaug; Knut Hagen; Anne Vik; Lars Jacob Stovner; Turid Follestad; Torunn Pedersen; Gøril Bruvik Gravdahl; Mattias Linde
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 7.277

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Equity and Disparities in Diagnosis, Management, and Research of Post-Traumatic Headache.

Authors:  Mejgan G Mukhtarzada; Teshamae S Monteith
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-05-14

Review 2.  Persistent post-traumatic headache: a migrainous loop or not? The preclinical evidence.

Authors:  Silvia Benemei; Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez; Ekaterina Abramova; Nicoletta Brunelli; Edoardo Caronna; Paola Diana; Roman Gapeshin; Maxi Dana Hofacker; Ilaria Maestrini; Enrique Martínez Pías; Petr Mikulenka; Olga Tikhonova; Paolo Martelletti; Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 3.  Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: From Present to Future.

Authors:  Rosalia Crupi; Marika Cordaro; Salvatore Cuzzocrea; Daniela Impellizzeri
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 4.  Persistent post-traumatic headache: a migrainous loop or not? The clinical evidence.

Authors:  Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez; Silvia Benemei; Maria Albanese; Antonina D'Amico; Giovanni Grillo; Oxana Grosu; Devrimsel Harika Ertem; Jasper Mecklenburg; Elena Petrovna Fedorova; Pavel Řehulka; Francesca Schiano di Cola; Javier Trigo Lopez; Nina Vashchenko; Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 5.  The Relation between Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache and PTSD: Similarities and Possible Differences.

Authors:  Martina Guglielmetti; Gianluca Serafini; Mario Amore; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Provider Training in the Management of Headache Following Concussion Clinical Recommendation: Promoting a Standardized Means for Efficient Patient Recovery and Timely Return to Duty.

Authors:  Rosemay A Remigio-Baker; Seth Kiser; Hamid Ferdosi; Emma Gregory; Scot Engel; Sean Sebesta; Daniel Beauchamp; Saafan Malik; Ann Scher; Sidney R Hinds
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Position Paper on Post-Traumatic Headache: The Relationship Between Head Trauma, Stress Disorder, and Migraine.

Authors:  Giorgio Lambru; Silvia Benemei; Anna P Andreou; Michelangelo Luciani; Gianluca Serafini; Antoinette Maassen van den Brink; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-11-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.