| Literature DB >> 32033389 |
Shi Qiu1, Haiwei Yin1, Jinling Deng2, Muhan Li1.
Abstract
The control of non-point source pollution (NPS) is an essential target in urban stormwater control. Green stormwater control measures (SCMs) have remarkable efficiency for pollution control, but suffer from high maintenance,operation costs and poor performance in high-intensity rainfall events. Taking the Guilin Road subwatershed in Rizhao, China, as a case study, a scheme for coupling gray and green stormwater control measures is proposed, and the gray SCMs are introduced to compensate for the shortcomings of green SCMs. The System for Urban Stormwater Treatment and Analysis Integration (SUSTAIN) model was employed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of three scenarios (green SCMs only, gray SCMs only, and coupled green-gray SCMs). The results show that the optimal solutions for the three scenarios cost USD 1.23, 0.79, and 0.80 million, respectively. The NPS control ability of the coupled green-gray scenario is found to be better than that of the other two scenarios under rainfall events above moderate rain. This study demonstrates that coupled green-gray stormwater control management can not only effectively control costs, but can also provide better pollution control in high-intensity rainfall events, making it an optimal scheme for effective prevention and control of urban non-point source pollution.Entities:
Keywords: SUSTAIN model; cost-effectiveness analysis; high-intensity rainfall; multi-scenarios analysis; rainfall-runoff; urban non-point source pollution
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033389 PMCID: PMC7037396 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location of the study site and land use map of the area.
Land use distribution in the study area.
| Land Use Type | Green Space | Building | Road | Other Impervious Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (ha) | 51.46 | 39.47 | 35.90 | 12.07 |
| Percentage (%) | 37.05 | 28.42 | 25.84 | 8.69 |
Dimensions and cost of different stormwater control measures (SCMs).
| SCMs | Structural Parameters | Soil Parameters | Cost (USD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (m) | Width (m) | Height (m) | Surface Storage (m) | Bottom Storage (m) | Depth (m) | Void Ratio | ||
| IT 1 | Depends on location | 1.8 | -- | 0.15 | -- | 0.2 | 0.6 | 38.15/m3 |
| PP 2 | Depends on location | 5 | -- | -- | -- | 0.24 | -- | 28.84/m2 |
| CS 3 | 6 | -- | 4.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 55.80/m2 |
| GR 4 | Depends on location | -- | -- | -- | 0.3 | 0.4 | 46.5/m2 | |
| BC 5 | Depends on location | -- | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.6 | 121.38/m2 | |
| VFS 6 | Depends on location | 10 | Side Slope | Surface Slope | Roughness | 0.2 | 0.6 | 65.98/m2 |
| 1:3 | 4% | 0.2 | ||||||
1 Infiltration trench; 2 Porous pavement; 3 Cistern; 4 Green roof; 5 Bioretention cell; 6 Vegetated filter strip.
Figure 2Comparison between simulated and observed results for the outflow and total suspended solids (TSS) concentration.
Parameters for the runoff simulation.
| Parameter | Input Value | Parameter | Input Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| N-Imperv 1 | 0.005 | Max.Infil.Rate 4 (mm/h) | 76.2 |
| N-Perv 2 | 0.15 | Min.Infil.Rate 5 (mm/h) | 10.16 |
| Conduits’ Manning’s N | 0.04 | Decay Constant | 5 |
| DStore-Imperv 3 (mm) | 0.1 | DStore-Perv 6 (mm) | 2.54 |
1 Manning’s N for impervious area; 2 Manning’s N for pervious area; 3 Depth of depression storage on impervious area; 4 Maximum infiltration rate; 5 Minimum infiltration rate; 6 Depth of depression storage on pervious area.
Contamination accumulation and erosion parameters for the water quality simulation.
| Land Use Type | Buildup Parameters | Wash-off Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building | Max. Buildup (kg/ha) | 123.8 | Coefficient | 0.007 |
| Rate Constant (d) | 0.31 | Exponent | 1.8 | |
| Green Space | Max. Buildup (kg/ha) | 105.6 | Coefficient | 0.004 |
| Rate Constant (d) | 0.9 | Exponent | 1.2 | |
| Road/Other Impervious Surface | Max. Buildup (kg/ha) | 114.66 | Coefficient | 0.008 |
| Rate Constant (d) | 1.02 | Exponent | 1.8 | |
Figure 3Suitability maps for gray and green stormwater control measures (SCMs). (a) Suitability maps for gray SCMs. (b) Suitability maps for green SCMs.
Areas and proportions of different SCMs.
| SCMs | IT | PP | CS | GR | BC | VFS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (ha) | 4.62 | 4.45 | 2.61 | 1.16 | 5.34 | 4.04 | 16.14 |
| Proportion (%) | 3.33 | 3.21 | 1.88 | 0.84 | 3.85 | 2.91 | 16.02 |
Figure 4Status quo and SCM scenarios. (a) S0: Status quo scenario. (b) S1: Green SCMs only scenario. (c) S2: Gray SCMs only scenario. (d) S3: Coupled green–gray SCMs scenario.
Figure 5Cost-effectiveness curves and optimal solutions for different scenarios. (a) S1. (b) S2. (c) S3.
Composition of optimal solutions under different scenarios.
| Scenarios | SCMs | Cost Proportion (%) | Total Cost (USD Million) | Total Area (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | BC | 52 | 0.64 | 0.53 |
| GR | 1 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |
| VFS | 47 | 0.58 | 0.87 | |
| Total | 100 | 1.23 | 1.43 | |
| S2 | CS | 6 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| PP | 60 | 0.48 | 1.65 | |
| IT | 34 | 0.26 | 3.53 | |
| Total | 100 | 0.79 | 5.24 | |
| S3 | CS | 27 | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| BC | 20 | 0.16 | 0.13 | |
| PP | 6 | 0.05 | 0.17 | |
| GR | 3 | 0.02 | 0.05 | |
| VFS | 23 | 0.18 | 0.28 | |
| IT | 21 | 0.17 | 2.19 | |
| Total | 100 | 0.80 | 2.94 |
Figure 6Box plot of event mean concentrations (EMCs) under different rainfall event types.
Figure 7Box plot of pollution reduction percentage under different rainfall event types.