| Literature DB >> 32033358 |
Chen Chen1,2, Zhixiong Chen3, Jiajun Chen1,2, Jiawei Huang1,2, Huiling Li1,2, Shaolong Sun4, Xiangdong Liu1,3, Aimin Wu1,2, Bo Wang1,3.
Abstract
The improvement of the saccharification of rice straw is one of the strategies to reduce the sophisticated pretreatment that results in high cost and is unfriendly to the environment. We explored the cell wall features in tetraploid rice and highlighted the enhanced saccharification of tetraploid with large biomass. Results showed that lignin content and S/G ratio reduced to 17.09% and 0.37, respectively, in tetraploid straw by the determination of the pyGC-MS method. After the pretreatment, the cellulose crystallinity index decreased from 63.22% to 57.65% in tetraploid straw, which is lower than that of pretreated diploid straw. Surface topological analysis of SEM images indicated that tetraploid straw was more susceptible to the pretreatment. Tetraploid straw showed a strong advantage in the process of enzymatic hydrolysis. The enzyme efficiency reached the highest value of 77.60%, and the rate of enzyme reaction was improved to make the reaction saturated earlier than conventional rice. We concluded that the high saccharification has resulted from the alteration of lignin and cellulose in tetraploid rice. Our research provides an improved green feedstock for bioenergy, and the tetraploid rice straw shows the potential utilization value in bioethanol production.Entities:
Keywords: cell wall; composition; enzymatic saccharification; lignocellulose; tetraploid rice
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033358 PMCID: PMC7077374 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the experimental process.
Figure 2Straw morphology in diploid (2×) and tetraploid (4×) rice. (a) Straw phenotype. (b) Cell number and cell size calculated by ImageJ. (c) Straw slice dyeing with toluidine blue.
Figure 3Monosaccharide component analysis of cell wall of tetraploid rice (4×) and diploid rice (2×). The significance analysis followed the student’s t-test, ** indicates P ≤ 0.01, * indicates P ≤ 0.05.
Composition of tetraploid straw cell wall.
| Sample | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) | S (%) | G (%) | S/G | Ash (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2× | 30.51 ± 2.15 | 19.41 ± 0.42 | 3.32 ± 0.09 | 8.59 ± 0.17 | 0.40 ± 0.007 | 14.32 |
| 4× | 26.07 ± 1.76 * | 17.09 ± 0.51 *** | 2.83 ± 0.11 *** | 7.51 ± 0.24 ** | 0.37 ± 0.009 ** | 10.15 ** |
The significance analysis followed student’s t-test, *** means P ≤ 0.001, ** means P ≤ 0.01, * means P ≤ 0.05. The S (%) and G (%) data means the proportion of Syringyl units or Guaiacyl units in total composition (C+G+S+H+P+U+0). 4× refers to tetraploid rice, and 2× refers to diploid rice.
Figure 4Saccharification of tetraploid rice straw. (a) The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysate of tetraploid (4×), diploid (2×), tetraploid after pretreatment (4×-p), and the diploid after pretreatment (2×-p). (b) Glucose increment over the reaction periods. It reflects the rate of glucose products during enzymatic hydrolysis. The significance analysis followed LSD-test.
Elemental normalization semi-quantitative analysis.
| Sample | Chemical Element | Standard Sample | Uniformization (Weight)% | Uniformization (Atomicity)% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2× | Al | Al2O3 | ND a | ND a |
| Si | SiO2 | 99.55 | 99.89 | |
| Cd | Cd | 0.45 | 0.11 | |
| 4× | Al | Al2O3 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Si | SiO2 | 94.8 | 98.61 | |
| Cd | Cd | 5.15 | 1.34 |
a ND, not detected.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscope of tetraploid (4×), diploid (2×), tetraploid after pretreatment (4×-p), and the diploid after pretreatment (2×-p).
Figure 6Fourier transform infrared analysis of tetraploid (4×), diploid (2×), tetraploid after pretreatment (4×-p), and the diploid after pretreatment (2×-p).
Figure 7Diffraction of X-rays of tetraploid (4×), diploid (2×), tetraploid after pretreatment (4×-p), and the diploid after pretreatment (2×-p).