| Literature DB >> 32033346 |
Jing Zhang1, Jian Lv1, Jianming Xie1, Yantai Gan2, Jeffrey A Coulter3, Jihua Yu1, Jing Li1, Junwen Wang1, Xiaodan Zhang1.
Abstract
Phytochemical analyses of pepper fruit metabolites have been reported; however, much less is known about the influence of different forms ofEntities:
Keywords: ammonium; capsaicinoid synthetase; glutamine synthetase; liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; placenta
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033346 PMCID: PMC7073546 DOI: 10.3390/foods9020150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Sequence (5′-3′) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|
|
| F: 5′-CAACAGCAACATCACCCCATGTTTGC-3′ | AF081215 |
| R: 5′-GCTGCAACTCGAAAAATCCACCAC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-TCAGATTCCTTCCATTCGGT-3′ | EU620574 |
| R: 5′-CTTTCTCCGTGGTGTCGAG-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-AAACAAGCCATAGCCTAACTCAAAC-3′ | AF081214 |
| R: 5′-AAGTAGCAAGAAGCCTAAACATTCG-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-AAAGCGTTTAGAAGAGAGGATGG-3′ | AY034379 |
| R: 5′-GACAAGGAATGTGTACTCAGGTG-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CAATGTTGTCTCGGGGGAGTTTTC-3′ | AF318288 |
| R: 5′-CTCTCTCTCTCATTAGTAGCTACAGC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CCTCATGCATCTCTTGCAGAGAGCATAG-3′ | AY819027 |
| R: 5′-GTCGTATGATCACGAGTAACGCTAGACC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-GGAAGGGACACAGAGAAGGC-3′ | XM_016717075.1 |
| R: 5′-AACAAGCGATCCTTCGAGCA-3′ | ||
|
| F: ATGAATGATGACGAGGACTTTGC | EU616574 |
| R: GTCACGACTGTTTGCTT | ||
|
| F: TTGGGAAAGGAGTTGATGGG | EU616563 |
| R: AACAGCACCTACAGCAAGAAGAAT | ||
|
| F: GTCCTTCCATCGTCCACAGG | XM_016722297.1 |
| R: GAAGGGCAAAGGTTCACAACA |
Note: GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Figure 1Score scatter plot for principal component analysis with quality control (QC). T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50, PE, pericarp; PL, placenta. R2X: The interpretation of X variable.
Figure 2Pie chart (A) showing differential metabolite classification. Venn diagrams showing the shared differential metabolite numbers of different tissues (B) and treatments (C). T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50, PE, pericarp; PL, placenta.
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of differential metabolites in pepper pericarp and placenta at different NH4+:NO3− ratios. T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50, PE, pericarp; PL, placenta. Euclidean distance and average linkage were used to construct the clustering of metabolites. The color block represents the relative expression of metabolites in the corresponding position.
Figure 4Diagram of the synthesis of capsaicinoids adapted from Mazourek et al. and Kim et al. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL), COMT, caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase; HCHL, hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA hydratase lyase; AMT, aminotransferase; GS, glutamine synthetase; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; BCAT, branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase; FatA, acyl-ACP thioesterase; CS, capsaicinoid synthetase. Non-measured and non-detected metabolites are set in gray and metabolites quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry are set in black. Significantly changed (VIP > 1 from partial least squares discriminant analysis and p < 0.05 from t-test) metabolites are set in red. Genes marked by blue arrows were analyzed in this experiment.
Metabolic pathway analysis from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).
| Treatments | Pathway | Total | Hits | Raw | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 PE vs. PL | Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from terpenoid and polyketide | 4 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.18 |
| Carbon metabolism | 4 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.18 | |
| Taste transduction | 4 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.18 | |
| Rel cell carcinoma | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites - unclassified | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Pathways in cancer | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Methane metabolism | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| T2 PE vs. PL | Phosphotransferase system (PTS) | 4 | 3 | 0.04 | 0.32 |
| Galactose metabolism | 2 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.24 | |
| Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | 2 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.24 | |
| T3 PE vs. PL | Central carbon metabolism in cancer | 6 | 3 | 0.07 | 0.36 |
| PE T1 vs. T2 | Microbial metabolism in diverse environments | 12 | 4 | 0.01 | 0.22 |
| Caffeine metabolism | 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites | 26 | 4 | 0.10 | 0.47 | |
| PL T1 vs. T2 | Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | 2 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Galactose metabolism | 2 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.11 | |
| Phosphotransferase system (PTS) | 4 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.22 | |
| PE T1 vs. T3 | Caffeine metabolism | 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| PL T1 vs. T3 | Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | 2 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Galactose metabolism | 2 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
| Phosphotransferase system (PTS) | 4 | 2 | 0.07 | 0.07 | |
| PE T2 vs. T3 | Pentose phosphate pathway | 1 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| PL T2 vs. T3 | Mineral absorption | 2 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | 3 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Cyanoamino acid metabolism | 3 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 4 | 1 | 0.07 | 0.07 | |
| Protein digestion and absorption | 4 | 1 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
Note: KEGG (https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html); Total, the number of metabolites in the pathway; Hit, the number of differential metabolites hitting the pathway; Raw p, P value obtained by enrichment analysis; Impact, impact factors of the topological analysis. T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50, PE, pericarp; PL, placenta.
Figure 5Fruit weight (A), capsaicin (B), and dihydrocapsaicin (C) contents in pepper pericarp and placenta at different NH4+:NO3− ratios. T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 3) and different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) (A), capsaicinoid synthetase (CS) (B), glutamate synthase (GOGAT) (C), and glutamine synthetase (GS), and (D) enzymes in pepper pericarp and placenta at different NH4+:NO3− ratios. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 3) and different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50.
Figure 7Relative expression level of genes in pericarp and placenta. (A) PAL (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase); (B) COMT (caffeic acid-3-O-methyltransferase); (C) C4H (cinnamate 4-hydroxylase); (D) BCAT (branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase); (E) FatA (acyl-ACP thioesterase); (F) AT3 (acyltransferase); (G) NADH-GOGAT (putative NADH-dependent glutamate synthase); (H) Fdx-GOGAT (putative ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase); (I) GS (glutamine synthetase). T1, NH4+:NO3− = 0:100; T2, NH4+:NO3− = 25:75; T3, NH4+:NO3− = 50:50. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 3) and different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Heat map of Pearson’s correlation coefficients. PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; COMT, caffeic acid-3-O-methyltransferase; BCAT, branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase; FatA, acyl-ACP thioesterase; GS, glutamine synthetase; NADH-GOGAT, putative NADH-dependent glutamate synthase; Fdx-GOGAT, putative ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase; AT3, acyltransferase; RE, relative expression. Values are Pearson’s correlation coefficients. * and ** denote correlation coefficients that are significant at p < 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively.