| Literature DB >> 32033325 |
Shuai Zhang1, He Chen1, Yin Zhang1, Yi-Meng Zhang1, Weiyan Kan1, Mingzhu Pan1.
Abstract
To derive class="Chemical">P,N-doped cellulose fibrils,Entities:
Keywords: flame retardancy; microstructural analysis; polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); thermal stability
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033325 PMCID: PMC7077376 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Possible reactions of phosphoric acid with (a) cellulose, and (b) excessive aqueous ammonia.
Figure 1SEM images of (a) untreated cellulose, (b) P-doped cellulose, and (c) P,N-doped cellulose.
Figure 2Elemental mappings of (a) untreated cellulose, (b) P-doped cellulose, and (c) P,N-doped cellulose fibrils from SEM-EDS analyses.
Figure 3Characteristics of untreated and treated cellulose: (a) FTIR spectra, (b) XRD spectra, (c) XPS survey spectra, and XPS survey spectra of P2p for P-doped cellulose (d), and P,N-doped cellulose (e).
Figure 4Thermal results of untreated and treated cellulose. (a) TG-DTG curves, and the three-dimensional infrared spectra of TG-FTIR of (b) untreated cellulose, (c) P-doped cellulose, and (d) P,N-doped cellulose fibrils.
Figure 5Thermal results of HDPE composites exposed to a nitrogen atmosphere (a) TG, and (b) DTG.
Cone calorimeter and LOI results of HDPE composites with P,N-doped cellulose.
| Samples | LOI | Average HRR | Peak HRR | at time | TTI | THR | FGR | EHC | SEA | TSR | MLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | kW/m2 | kW/m2 | s | s | MJ/m2 | kW/m2· s | MJ/kg | m2/kg | m2/m2 | g/s | |
| HDPE | 19.7 | 263.78 | 1519.21 | 200 | 53 | 170.16 | 7.58 | 44.63 | 414.48 | 1621.64 | 0.0522 |
| untreated 7 wt % | 20.3 | 260.98 | 1035.73 | 197.50 | 24.5 | 176.17 | 5.24 | 43.42 | 446.22 | 1832.06 | 0.0532 |
| P,N-doped 1 wt % | 20.4 | 277.90 | 1417.39 | 222.50 | 24.5 | 187.59 | 6.37 | 45.33 | 557.87 | 2313.94 | 0.0544 |
| P,N-doped 3 wt % | 23.5 | 230.36 | 765.05 | 145.00 | 23 | 155.49 | 5.29 | 38.83 | 683.56 | 2737.71 | 0.0524 |
| P,N-doped 5 wt % | 25.1 | 201.97 | 533.33 | 132.50 | 21 | 136.82 | 4.03 | 36.12 | 724.37 | 2745.81 | 0.0494 |
| P,N-doped 7 wt % | 25.7 | 185.76 | 412.30 | 95.00 | 25 | 124.93 | 4.34 | 32.55 | 776.35 | 2981.84 | 0.0504 |
| P,N-doped 9 wt % | 25.3 | 201.53 | 447.11 | 217.50 | 20 | 137.04 | 3.10 | 34.57 | 701.07 | 2777.96 | 0.0516 |
LOI: limited oxygen index; HRR: heat release rate; TTI: time to ignition; THR: total heat release; FGR: fire growth rate, FGR = Peak HRR/time to peak HRR; EHC: effective heat of combustion; SEA: specific extinction area; TSR: total smoke release.
Figure 6Cone calorimeter results of HDPE composites with untreated and P,N-doped cellulose: (a) HRR, (b) THR, (c) TSR, and (d) TSR curves within 20–100 s.
Figure 7Morphology of char residues of HDPE composites with (a,a’) 7 wt % untreated cellulose, and (b,b’) 7 wt % P,N-doped cellulose after cone calorimeter tests. The top row shows digital photographs, and the bottom row depicts SEM images.
Figure 8SEM-EDS analyses of char residues from combustion of HDPE composites with (a) 7 wt % untreated cellulose, and (b) 7 wt % P,N-doped cellulose.
Figure 9Characteristics of char residues of HDPE with 7 wt % untreated and P,N-doped cellulose after combustion: (a) FTIR spectra, (b) XRD spectra, and (c) Raman spectra.
Scheme 2Possible mechanism of flame retardancy of HDPE with P,N-doped cellulose.