Scott L Weiss, Fran Balamuth1,2, Marianne Chilutti3, Mark Jason Ramos3, Peter McBride2, Nancy-Ann Kelly4,1,5, K Joy Payton3, Julie C Fitzgerald4,1, Jeffrey W Pennington3. 1. Pediatric Sepsis Program at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 5. Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A method to identify pediatric sepsis episodes that is not affected by changing diagnosis and claims-based coding practices does not exist. We derived and validated a surveillance algorithm to identify pediatric sepsis using routine clinical data and applied the algorithm to study longitudinal trends in sepsis epidemiology. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: All emergency and hospital encounters from January 2011 to January 2019, excluding neonatal ICU and cardiac center. EXPOSURE: Sepsis episodes identified by a surveillance algorithm using clinical data to identify infection and concurrent organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A surveillance algorithm was derived and validated in separate cohorts with suspected sepsis after clinician-adjudication of final sepsis diagnosis. We then applied the surveillance algorithm to determine longitudinal trends in incidence and mortality of pediatric sepsis over 8 years. Among 93,987 hospital encounters and 1,065 episodes of suspected sepsis in the derivation period, the surveillance algorithm yielded sensitivity 78% (95% CI, 72-84%), specificity 76% (95% CI, 74-79%), positive predictive value 41% (95% CI, 36-46%), and negative predictive value 94% (95% CI, 92-96%). In the validation period, the surveillance algorithm yielded sensitivity 84% (95% CI, 77-92%), specificity of 65% (95% CI, 59-70%), positive predictive value 43% (95% CI, 35-50%), and negative predictive value 93% (95% CI, 90-97%). Notably, most "false-positives" were deemed clinically relevant sepsis cases after manual review. The hospital-wide incidence of sepsis was 0.69% (95% CI, 0.67-0.71%), and the inpatient incidence was 2.8% (95% CI, 2.7-2.9%). Risk-adjusted sepsis incidence, without bias from changing diagnosis or coding practices, increased over time (adjusted incidence rate ratio per year 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.08; p < 0.001). Mortality was 6.7% and did not change over time (adjusted odds ratio per year 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.03; p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm using routine clinical data provided an objective, efficient, and reliable method for pediatric sepsis surveillance. An increased sepsis incidence and stable mortality, free from influence of changes in diagnosis or billing practices, were evident.
OBJECTIVES: A method to identify pediatric sepsis episodes that is not affected by changing diagnosis and claims-based coding practices does not exist. We derived and validated a surveillance algorithm to identify pediatric sepsis using routine clinical data and applied the algorithm to study longitudinal trends in sepsis epidemiology. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: All emergency and hospital encounters from January 2011 to January 2019, excluding neonatal ICU and cardiac center. EXPOSURE: Sepsis episodes identified by a surveillance algorithm using clinical data to identify infection and concurrent organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A surveillance algorithm was derived and validated in separate cohorts with suspected sepsis after clinician-adjudication of final sepsis diagnosis. We then applied the surveillance algorithm to determine longitudinal trends in incidence and mortality of pediatric sepsis over 8 years. Among 93,987 hospital encounters and 1,065 episodes of suspected sepsis in the derivation period, the surveillance algorithm yielded sensitivity 78% (95% CI, 72-84%), specificity 76% (95% CI, 74-79%), positive predictive value 41% (95% CI, 36-46%), and negative predictive value 94% (95% CI, 92-96%). In the validation period, the surveillance algorithm yielded sensitivity 84% (95% CI, 77-92%), specificity of 65% (95% CI, 59-70%), positive predictive value 43% (95% CI, 35-50%), and negative predictive value 93% (95% CI, 90-97%). Notably, most "false-positives" were deemed clinically relevant sepsis cases after manual review. The hospital-wide incidence of sepsis was 0.69% (95% CI, 0.67-0.71%), and the inpatient incidence was 2.8% (95% CI, 2.7-2.9%). Risk-adjusted sepsis incidence, without bias from changing diagnosis or coding practices, increased over time (adjusted incidence rate ratio per year 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.08; p < 0.001). Mortality was 6.7% and did not change over time (adjusted odds ratio per year 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.03; p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm using routine clinical data provided an objective, efficient, and reliable method for pediatric sepsis surveillance. An increased sepsis incidence and stable mortality, free from influence of changes in diagnosis or billing practices, were evident.
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman; Foster Gesten; Michael Klompas; Mitchell Levy; Gregory S Martin; Tiffany M Osborn; Chanu Rhee; David K Warren; R Scott Watson; Derek C Angus Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: John C Lin; Philip C Spinella; Julie C Fitzgerald; Marisa Tucci; Jenny L Bush; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas; Scott L Weiss Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Fran Balamuth; Scott L Weiss; Matt Hall; Mark I Neuman; Halden Scott; Patrick W Brady; Raina Paul; Reid W D Farris; Richard McClead; Sierra Centkowski; Shannon Baumer-Mouradian; Jason Weiser; Katie Hayes; Samir S Shah; Elizabeth R Alpern Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Stéphane Leteurtre; Alain Duhamel; Julia Salleron; Bruno Grandbastien; Jacques Lacroix; Francis Leclerc Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Fran Balamuth; Scott L Weiss; Mark I Neuman; Halden Scott; Patrick W Brady; Raina Paul; Reid W D Farris; Richard McClead; Katie Hayes; David Gaieski; Matt Hall; Samir S Shah; Elizabeth R Alpern Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Idris V R Evans; Gary S Phillips; Elizabeth R Alpern; Derek C Angus; Marcus E Friedrich; Niranjan Kissoon; Stanley Lemeshow; Mitchell M Levy; Margaret M Parker; Kathleen M Terry; R Scott Watson; Scott L Weiss; Jerry Zimmerman; Christopher W Seymour Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Uvaraj Periasamy; Marianne Chilutti; Summer L Kaplan; Christopher P Hickey; Katie Hayes; Jeffrey W Pennington; Fran Balamuth; Julie C Fitzgerald; Scott L Weiss Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto; Melania M Bembea; Reid Wd Farris; Mary E Hartman; Folafoluwa O Odetola; Michael C Spaeder; R Scott Watson; Jerry J Zimmerman; Tellen D Bennett Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Halden F Scott; Richard J Brilli; Raina Paul; Charles G Macias; Matthew Niedner; Holly Depinet; Troy Richardson; Ruth Riggs; Heidi Gruhler; Gitte Y Larsen; W Charles Huskins; Fran Balamuth Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 9.296