Literature DB >> 32031867

Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.

Shitanshu Uppal1, Paola A Gehrig2, Katherine Peng1, Kristin L Bixel3, Koji Matsuo4, Monica H Vetter3, Brittany A Davidson5, M Paige Cisa5, Brittany F Lees6, Laurie L Brunette4, Katherine Tucker2, Allison Stuart Staley2, Walter H Gotlieb7, Robert W Holloway8, Kathleen G Essel9, Laura L Holman9, Ester Goldfeld10, Alexander Olawaiye10, Stephen L Rose6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomies (RH) performed in academic medical institutions.
METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients undergoing RH for stage IA1 (with lymphovascular invasion), IA2, and IB1 squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017.
RESULTS: Of 815 patients, open RH was performed in 255 cases (29.1%) and minimally invasive RH in 560 cases (70.9%). There were 19 (7.5%) recurrences in the open RH and 51 (9.1%) recurrences in the minimally invasive group (P = .43). Risk-adjusted analysis revealed that minimally invasive RH was independently associated with an increased hazard of recurrence (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.25). Other factors independently associated with an increased hazard of recurrence included tumor size, grade, and adjuvant radiation. Conization before surgery was associated with lower recurrence risk (aHR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.71). There was no difference in OS in the unadjusted analysis (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.11) or after risk adjustment (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.2). Of 264 patients with tumors ≤ 2 cm on final pathology (excluding those with no residual tumor on final pathology), 2/82 (2.4%) recurred in the open RH group and 16/182 (8.8%) in the minimally invasive RH group (P = .058). In propensity score matching analysis, 7/159 (4.4%) recurrences were noted in the open RH group and 18/156 (11.5%) in the minimally invasive RH group (P = .019). Survival analysis revealed an increased risk of recurrence in the minimally invasive group in propensity-matched cohort (HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.18).
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective series, patients undergoing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy, including those with tumor size ≤ 2 cm on final pathology, had inferior DFS but not overall survival in the entire cohort.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32031867     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.03012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Kate J Krause; Ana I Tergas; Jason D Wright; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.

Authors:  Andreas Kavallaris; Nektarios Chalvatzas; Antonios Gkoutzioulis; Dimitrios Zygouris
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.

Authors:  Glauco Baiocchi; Reitan Ribeiro; Ricardo Dos Reis; Deraldo Fernando Falcao; Andre Lopes; Ronaldo Lucio Rangel Costa; Gabriel Lowndes Souza Pinto; Marcelo Vieira; Lillian Yuri Kumagai; Carlos Chaves Faloppa; Henrique Mantoan; Levon Badiglian-Filho; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Tariane Friedrich Foiato; Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha Andrade; Leonardo Oliveira Palmeira; Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves; Paulo Henrique Zanvettor
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.

Authors:  Gloria Salvo; Pedro T Ramirez; Mario M Leitao; David Cibula; Xiaohua Wu; Henrik Falconer; Jan Persson; Myriam Perrotta; Berit J Mosgaard; Ali Kucukmetin; Igor Berlev; Gabriel Rendon; Kaijiang Liu; Marcelo Vieira; Mihai E Capilna; Christina Fotopoulou; Glauco Baiocchi; Dilyara Kaidarova; Reitan Ribeiro; Silvana Pedra-Nobre; Roman Kocian; Xiaoqi Li; Jin Li; Kolbrún Pálsdóttir; Florencia Noll; Stuart Rundle; Elena Ulrikh; Zhijun Hu; Mihai Gheorghe; Srdjan Saso; Raikhan Bolatbekova; Audrey Tsunoda; Brandelyn Pitcher; Jimin Wu; Diana Urbauer; Rene Pareja
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 5.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Yoo Young Lee; Min Chul Choi; Jeong Yeol Park; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Time to accept a new old standard of care in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.661

Review 7.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Derman Basaran; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate Versus Open Abdominal Surgery for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients With Tumor Size Less Than 2 Centimeter: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Chen; Jiangtao Yu; Hongqin Zhao; Yan Hu; Haiyan Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis.

Authors:  Wancheng Zhao; Yunyun Xiao; Wei Zhao; Qing Yang; Fangfang Bi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.