Danielle C DeVille1,2, Diana Whalen3,4,5, Florence J Breslin1, Amanda S Morris1,6, Sahib S Khalsa1,7, Martin P Paulus1,7, Deanna M Barch3,4,5. 1. Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 2. Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 3. Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Human Development and Family Science, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa. 7. Oxley College of Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Abstract
Importance: Although suicide is a leading cause of death for children in the United States, and the rate of suicide in childhood has steadily increased, little is known about suicidal ideation and behaviors in children. Objective: To assess the overall prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury, as well as family-related factors associated with suicidality and self-injury among preadolescent children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study using retrospective analysis of the baseline sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. This multicenter investigation used an epidemiologically informed school-based recruitment strategy, with consideration of the demographic composition of the 21 ABCD sites and the United States as a whole. The sample included children aged 9 to 10 years and their caregivers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lifetime suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury as reported by children and their caregivers in a computerized version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Results: A total of 11 814 children aged 9 to 10 years (47.8% girls; 52.0% white) and their caregivers were included. After poststratification sociodemographic weighting, the approximate prevalence rates were 6.4% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.3%) for lifetime history of passive suicidal ideation; 4.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.0%) for nonspecific active suicidal ideation; 2.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.7%) for active ideation with method, intent, or plan; 1.3% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.6%) for suicide attempts; and 9.1% (95% CI, 8.1-10.3) for nonsuicidal self-injury. After covarying by sex, family history, internalizing and externalizing problems, and relevant psychosocial variables, high family conflict was significantly associated with suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16) and nonsuicidal self-injury (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.14), and low parental monitoring was significantly associated with ideation (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98), attempts (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and nonsuicidal self-injury (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98); these findings were consistent after internal replication. Most of children's reports of suicidality and self-injury were either unknown or not reported by their caregivers. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates the association of family factors, including high family conflict and low parental monitoring, with suicidality and self-injury in children. Future research and ongoing prevention and intervention efforts may benefit from the examination of family factors.
Importance: Although suicide is a leading cause of death for children in the United States, and the rate of suicide in childhood has steadily increased, little is known about suicidal ideation and behaviors in children. Objective: To assess the overall prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury, as well as family-related factors associated with suicidality and self-injury among preadolescent children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study using retrospective analysis of the baseline sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. This multicenter investigation used an epidemiologically informed school-based recruitment strategy, with consideration of the demographic composition of the 21 ABCD sites and the United States as a whole. The sample included children aged 9 to 10 years and their caregivers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lifetime suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury as reported by children and their caregivers in a computerized version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Results: A total of 11 814 children aged 9 to 10 years (47.8% girls; 52.0% white) and their caregivers were included. After poststratification sociodemographic weighting, the approximate prevalence rates were 6.4% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.3%) for lifetime history of passive suicidal ideation; 4.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.0%) for nonspecific active suicidal ideation; 2.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.7%) for active ideation with method, intent, or plan; 1.3% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.6%) for suicide attempts; and 9.1% (95% CI, 8.1-10.3) for nonsuicidal self-injury. After covarying by sex, family history, internalizing and externalizing problems, and relevant psychosocial variables, high family conflict was significantly associated with suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16) and nonsuicidal self-injury (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.14), and low parental monitoring was significantly associated with ideation (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98), attempts (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and nonsuicidal self-injury (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98); these findings were consistent after internal replication. Most of children's reports of suicidality and self-injury were either unknown or not reported by their caregivers. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates the association of family factors, including high family conflict and low parental monitoring, with suicidality and self-injury in children. Future research and ongoing prevention and intervention efforts may benefit from the examination of family factors.
Authors: Joseph C Franklin; Jessica D Ribeiro; Kathryn R Fox; Kate H Bentley; Evan M Kleiman; Xieyining Huang; Katherine M Musacchio; Adam C Jaroszewski; Bernard P Chang; Matthew K Nock Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Janis Whitlock; Jennifer Muehlenkamp; John Eckenrode; Amanda Purington; Gina Baral Abrams; Paul Barreira; Victoria Kress Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Matthew K Nock; Irving Hwang; Nancy Sampson; Ronald C Kessler; Matthias Angermeyer; Annette Beautrais; Guilherme Borges; Evelyn Bromet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Chiyi Hu; Yueqin Huang; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Viviane Kovess; Daphna Levinson; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Toma Tomov; Maria Carmen Viana; David R Williams Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jaclyn S Kirshenbaum; Rajpreet Chahal; Tiffany C Ho; Lucy S King; Anthony J Gifuni; Dana Mastrovito; Saché M Coury; Rachel L Weisenburger; Ian H Gotlib Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 8.265
Authors: Laika D Aguinaldo; Aimee Goldstone; Brant P Hasler; David A Brent; Clarisa Coronado; Joanna Jacobus Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Gal Shoval; Elina Visoki; Tyler M Moore; Grace E DiDomenico; Stirling T Argabright; Nicholas J Huffnagle; Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Rebecca Waller; Luke Keele; Tami D Benton; Raquel E Gur; Ran Barzilay Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Stirling T Argabright; Elina Visoki; Tyler M Moore; Dallas T Ryan; Grace E DiDomenico; Wanjikũ F M Njoroge; Jerome H Taylor; Sinan Guloksuz; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Tami D Benton; Ran Barzilay Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 13.113
Authors: Diana J Whalen; Laura Hennefield; Nourhan M Elsayed; Rebecca Tillman; Deanna M Barch; Joan L Luby Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 13.113
Authors: Shervin Assari; Shanika Boyce; Mohsen Bazargan; Cleopatra H Caldwell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Gareth Harman; Dakota Kliamovich; Angelica M Morales; Sydney Gilbert; Deanna M Barch; Michael A Mooney; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Damien A Fair; Bonnie J Nagel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240