Literature DB >> 32031593

Sex differences and higher upper normal limits for left atrial end-systolic volume in individuals in their mid-60s: data from the ACE 1950 Study.

Peter Selmer Rønningen1,2, Trygve Berge1, Magnar Gangås Solberg1,2, Steve Enger1, Ståle Nygård3, Mohammad Osman Pervez2,4, Eivind Bjørkan Orstad4, Brede Kvisvik2,4, Erika Nerdrum Aagaard2,4, Helge Røsjø2,5, Arnljot Tveit1,2, Kjetil Steine2,4.   

Abstract

AIMS: The current study aimed to describe normal values of left atrial (LA) volumes and LA emptying fraction (LAEF) in a large sample in their mid-60s from the general population and to explore sex differences. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 Study, body surface area-indexed LA maximum (LAVimax) and minimum (LAVimin) volumes and LAEF were measured in 3489 individuals aged 63.9 ± 0.6 years from the general population. A healthy group of 832 individuals was defined. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and a normal range of mean ± 2 SD. T-tests were used for comparisons. In the healthy group, mean LAVimax was 25.5 ± 6.2 mL/m2 and the normal range was 13.1-37.9 mL/m2. Men had significantly larger body surface area-indexed volumes than women, but there was no difference in LAEF. The mean LAVimax for healthy men was 26.4 ± 6.5 mL/m2, for healthy women 24.9 ± 5.8 mL/m2 (P < 0.001) and the upper normal limits were 39.4 and 36.5 mL/m2, respectively. In the healthy group, 13.0% of all men and 5.4% of all women had LAVimax above the current upper normal limit of 34 mL/m2.
CONCLUSION: A large proportion of healthy individuals, in particular men, had LAVimax >34 mL/m2. Our findings suggest that the recommended cut-off may be too low at the age of 65 years and above and that sex-specific cut-offs should be considered. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; general population; left atrial volume; normal values; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32031593     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  3 in total

Review 1.  Left atrial function in diabetes: does it help?

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Impact of Blood Pressure in the Early 40s on Left Atrial Volumes in the Mid-60s: Data From the ACE 1950 Study.

Authors:  Peter Selmer Rønningen; Trygve Berge; Magnar Gangås Solberg; Steve Enger; Mohammad Osman Pervez; Eivind Bjørkan Orstad; Brede Kvisvik; Erika Nerdrum Aagaard; Magnus Nakrem Lyngbakken; Inger Ariansen; Helge Røsjø; Kjetil Steine; Arnljot Tveit
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 3.  Left atrial disease and left atrial reverse remodelling across different stages of heart failure development and progression: a new target for prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Riccardo M Inciardi; Andrea Bonelli; Tor Biering-Sorensen; Matteo Cameli; Matteo Pagnesi; Carlo Mario Lombardi; Scott D Solomon; Marco Metra
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.