Literature DB >> 32031274

Direct bridging to cardiac transplantation with the surgically implanted Impella 5.0 device.

Laura Seese1,2, Gavin Hickey2,3, Mary E Keebler2,3, Michael A Mathier2,3, Ibrahim Sultan1,2, Thomas G Gleason1,2, Catalin Toma2,3, Arman Kilic1,2.   

Abstract

This study evaluated outcomes of direct bridging to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) with the Impella 5.0 device. Adult recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry bridged to OHT with the Impella 5.0 device between 2010 to 2018 were included. Outcomes included waitlist and post-transplant survival. A total of 236 patients were wait-listed with Impella 5.0 support, and 24% (n = 57) underwent bridge to OHT. Early and late post-transplant survival was excellent at 96.5% at 30 day, 93.8% at 90-day, and 90.3% at 1-year follow-up. Post-transplant complications were infrequent, but the most common were renal failure requiring dialysis (8.8%, n = 5), cerebrovascular accidents (1.8%, n = 1), and pacemaker implant (1.8%, n = 1). The rate of waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration was 20.0% (n = 47); however, the majority of patients were bridged to OHT (24%, n = 57) or durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (37.0%, n = 87). The median time supported on the device, while waitlisted was 13 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 7, 20 days). The Impella 5.0 device can be used as a direct bridge to OHT with excellent survival and minimal post-transplant morbidity. Overall, these data support the utilization of Impella 5.0 as a bridge to OHT in select patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impella 5.0; heart transplantation; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32031274     DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  2 in total

1.  Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0® Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France.

Authors:  Alexandre Le Guyader; Mathieu Pernot; Clément Delmas; Stéphane Roze; Isabelle Fau; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-19

2.  New Surgical Circulatory Support System Outcomes.

Authors:  Danny Ramzy; Edward Soltesz; Mark Anderson
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.826

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.