Literature DB >> 32030949

[Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of proximal humeral fracture].

Yu Li1, Hao Zhang2, Lizhi Wang1, Qiu Zheng1, Shizhuo Xiao1, Hongbin Yang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effectiveness of two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture.
METHODS: Between June 2014 and January 2018, 17 patients with deep infection and humeral head necrosis or bone nonunion after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures were treated. There were 8 males and 9 females, aged from 52 to 78 years (mean, 63.8 years). The infection occurred at 19-66 months after the initial internal fixation (mean, 34.8 months). Microbial culture of joint fluid was positive in 14 cases and negative in 3 cases. The preoperative Constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 36.41±8.65, 31.06±7.43, and 7.29±0.99, respectively. The preoperative ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation were (45.88±12.46), (42.18±12.31), and (16.76±4.92)°, respectively. The preoperative range of internal rotation was buttock in 9 cases, lumbosacral joint in 3 cases, L 3 in 5 cases. At the first-stage surgery, the thorough debridement was done and the antibiotic-impregnated bone cement spacer was placed after the removal of internal fixation. After the infections disappeared, the two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The mean interval between the two procedures was 4.2 months (range, 3.0-6.5 months).
RESULTS: All the incisions healed primarily and no complications such as recurrent infection or vascular nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 22.0 months). At last follow-up, the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were (109.00±23.66), (98.53±16.92), (41.41±6.82)°, respectively; and the range of internal rotation was lumbosacral joint in 5 cases, L 3 in 8 cases, T 12 in 4 cases. The range of motion of shoulder joints at last follow-up was significant improved when compared with the preoperative range of motion ( P<0.05). The Constant score (64.88±8.70), ASES score (65.18±8.10), and VAS score (2.94±1.25) were significantly superior to the preoperative scores ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that no prosthesis loosening occurred.
CONCLUSION: Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for the postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture, which has advantages of low risk of infection recurrence, good shoulder function, and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder joint; infection; internal fixation; proximal humeral fracture; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32030949      PMCID: PMC8171974          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  24 in total

Review 1.  [RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT OF REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY].

Authors:  Hao Wu; Daniel Goutallier
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2015-07

2.  Leukocyte esterase in the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Gregory N Nelson; E Scott Paxton; Alexa Narzikul; Gerald Williams; Mark D Lazarus; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  The outcome of resection shoulder arthroplasty for recalcitrant shoulder infections.

Authors:  Jonathan P Braman; Mark Sprague; Julie Bishop; Ian K Lo; Edward W Lee; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Reverse total shoulder arhroplasty for the treatment of failed fixation in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Carlos García-Fernández; Yaiza Lopiz; Belén Rizo; Laura Serrano-Mateo; Borja Alcobía-Díaz; Alberto Rodríguez-González; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel B Buchalter; Siddharth A Mahure; Brent Mollon; Stephen Yu; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure after failed internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  M M Hussey; S E Hussey; M A Mighell
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  One-stage exchange shoulder arthroplasty for peri-prosthetic infection.

Authors:  A Ince; K Seemann; L Frommelt; A Katzer; J F Loehr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

8.  Poor utility of serum interleukin-6 levels to predict indolent periprosthetic shoulder infections.

Authors:  Matthew J Grosso; Salvatore J Frangiamore; Anas Saleh; Mario Farias Kovac; Riku Hayashi; Eric T Ricchetti; Thomas W Bauer; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Management of deep postoperative shoulder infections: is there a role for open biopsy during staged treatment?

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; Brian T Feeley; Brian S Schwartz; Teddy T Chung; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected shoulder prostheses following arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Vikki Wylde; Andrew D Beswick; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.