Miina Nurmi1,2, Päivi Rautava2,3,4, Mika Gissler5,6,7, Tero Vahlberg8, Päivi Polo-Kantola1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 2. Center for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 3. Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 4. Turku Clinical Research Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 5. THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 6. Research Center for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 7. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 8. Department of Clinical Medicine, Biostatistics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hyperemesis gravidarum is the most common reason for hospitalization in early pregnancy in pregnancies resulting in delivery. Several associative factors indicate that the etiology is likely to be multifactorial. To assess this, we used a unique procedure to compare hyperemetic pregnancies with non-hyperemetic pregnancies both in different women and in the same women's different pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data about all pregnancies resulting in delivery in Finland in 2005-2017 were retrieved from healthcare registers. Women who had a diagnosis of hyperemesis gravidarum in any pregnancy in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register were chosen as cases (n = 9315) and other women (n = 428 150) as the reference group. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was calculated and associations between hyperemesis and maternal, environmental and pregnancy-related factors were analyzed in a novel setting by comparing case women's pregnancies diagnosed with hyperemesis to (1) reference group women's pregnancies and (2) case women's non-hyperemetic pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 437 465 women who had at least one pregnancy resulting in delivery during the study period, 9315 women had at least one hyperemetic pregnancy. The total number of pregnancies resulting in delivery was 741 387 and 9549 of those were diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum; thus the incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was 1.3%. In comparison (1), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs reference group's pregnancies, younger maternal age, higher gravidity, underweight and overweight were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis; in contrast, in comparison (2), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs their non-hyperemetic pregnancies, higher age and obesity were associated with higher risk of hyperemesis, whereas the risk was lower as gravidity and parity increased. In both comparisons, smoking was associated with lower risk, whereas higher municipality population, assisted reproductive technology, multiple gestation and female sex of the fetus were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel study setting provided new insights about risk factors: hyperemetic pregnancies differ both from pregnancies of women who had never been diagnosed with hyperemesis and from hyperemetic women's non-hyperemetic pregnancies. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum in Finland was comparable to that in other countries.
INTRODUCTION:Hyperemesis gravidarum is the most common reason for hospitalization in early pregnancy in pregnancies resulting in delivery. Several associative factors indicate that the etiology is likely to be multifactorial. To assess this, we used a unique procedure to compare hyperemetic pregnancies with non-hyperemetic pregnancies both in different women and in the same women's different pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data about all pregnancies resulting in delivery in Finland in 2005-2017 were retrieved from healthcare registers. Women who had a diagnosis of hyperemesis gravidarum in any pregnancy in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register were chosen as cases (n = 9315) and other women (n = 428 150) as the reference group. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was calculated and associations between hyperemesis and maternal, environmental and pregnancy-related factors were analyzed in a novel setting by comparing case women's pregnancies diagnosed with hyperemesis to (1) reference group women's pregnancies and (2) case women's non-hyperemetic pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 437 465 women who had at least one pregnancy resulting in delivery during the study period, 9315 women had at least one hyperemetic pregnancy. The total number of pregnancies resulting in delivery was 741 387 and 9549 of those were diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum; thus the incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was 1.3%. In comparison (1), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs reference group's pregnancies, younger maternal age, higher gravidity, underweight and overweight were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis; in contrast, in comparison (2), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs their non-hyperemetic pregnancies, higher age and obesity were associated with higher risk of hyperemesis, whereas the risk was lower as gravidity and parity increased. In both comparisons, smoking was associated with lower risk, whereas higher municipality population, assisted reproductive technology, multiple gestation and female sex of the fetus were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel study setting provided new insights about risk factors: hyperemetic pregnancies differ both from pregnancies of women who had never been diagnosed with hyperemesis and from hyperemetic women's non-hyperemetic pregnancies. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum in Finland was comparable to that in other countries.