Literature DB >> 32029861

Facilitating gene editing in potato: a Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) map of the Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree genome.

François Sevestre1, Maud Facon1, Fabrice Wattebled1, Nicolas Szydlowski2,3.   

Abstract

Genome editing is a powerful tool for plant functional genomics allowing for multiallelic targeted mutagenesis. The recent development of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) systems for gene editing in plants allows for simple, cost-effective introduction of site-specific double-stranded DNA breaks. The nuclear genomes of a homozygous doubled-monoploid potato clone (DM) and a heterozygous diploid clone (RH) have been sequenced in 2011. However, common potato cultivars display a highly heterozygous autotetraploid genome thus complicating target design for tetra-allelic gene editing. Here, we report on the SNP physical map of the widely used Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree and on the position of the diverse indels providing an essential tool for target design in genome editing approaches. We used this tool for designing a specific gRNA and successfully knocking-out a newly discovered starch synthase gene (SS6) in potato. Resequencing data are publicly available at the Sequence Read Archive of the NCBI (accession number: PRJNA507597) and will represent a valuable resource for functional genomic studies of various metabolic pathways, cell and plant physiology as well as high-throughput reverse genetics in potato.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32029861      PMCID: PMC7005264          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58985-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Potato belongs to the Solanaceae family such as tomato, eggplant, pepper or tobacco. About 200 tuber-bearing potato species are classified within the subgenus Potatoe of the genus Solanum. Common potato corresponds to the subspecies S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum that is cultivated for its starch-, vitamin-rich tubers. Potato is the fourth most important staple crop in the world with 377 million tonnes produced in 2016 thus substantially contributing to global food safety (www.fao.org). Similar to other staple crops comprising rice, wheat or maize, important research effort is put into improving potato in a climate changing context concomitant with increasing global population. This includes biofortification and yield increase, pest protection, abiotic stress adaptation as well as post-harvest conservation and processing. As an example, starch metabolism remains intensively investigated since it influences the rheological properties of processed food or non-food potato-based products[1]. In a recent study, we identified a series of unknown proteins in association with potato starch granules by shotgun mass spectrometry[2]. Among these proteins, a yet unknown isoform of starch synthase, SS6, showed very high potential to be a key enzyme of the starch biosynthetic pathway. Common potato species are autotetraploid (2n = 4x = 48) thus complicating traditional breeding. Traits of interest follow tetrasomic inheritance patterns and chromatid segregation may occur during crossing. Substantial work was performed to produce diploid clones and facilitate genetic research. In particular, this led to the genome release of a homozygous doubled-monoploid (DM) and a heterozygous diploid (RH) clone[3]. This important milestone for genetic studies and potato improvement revealed that inbreeding depression is likely related to the high genome plasticity of the species and the presence of numerous potentially deleterious mutations[3]. A series of transgenic strategies were employed both in functional genomic studies and crop breeding comprising insertional mutagenesis with the use of transposons or Agrobacterium mediated T-DNA insertions[4]. In both cases, multiple insertions can occur within plant genomes thus leading to undesired secondary mutations. Moreover, complete gene knockout (KO) in polyploids requires plant sexual propagation for at least two generations involving potential loss of valuable fixed traits. In the highly heterozygous tetraploid potato, such approach is laborious and time consuming. On the other hand, sequence-specific DNA nucleases were used to introduce double strand breaks (DSBs) that are repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR)[5]. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) are chimeric proteins composed of a sequence-specific domain fused to a non-specific nuclease (Fok1) that have proven successful in editing the genome of different plant species comprising potato[6-9]. Application of the recently developed Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology increased rapidly over the past years[10]. Contrary to TALENs and ZFNs, CRISPR/Cas9 do not require specific protein engineering and was efficient for introducing deletions, insertions and performing multiplex genome modifications of plants[11]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system involves a single monomeric nuclease and a chimeric RNA composed of a 20-bp segment conferring site specificity as well as a scaffold sequence necessary for Cas binding[11]. Proof of concept for CRISPR mutagenesis in the tetraploid potato was achieved with the use of a U6 promoter upstream of the gRNA[12,13]. In order to avoid integration of foreign DNA in the genome, strategies using transient expression of the Cas9 and the gRNA or transfection of CRISPR-Cas9 synthetic ribonucleoproteins into potato protoplasts were implemented[14,15]. Recently, the granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) was inactivated by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing of the conserved catalytic KTGGL-encoding locus in the tetraploid potato cultivar Desiree[1]. Regardless of the genome editing system, inducing homozygous DSBs in tetraploid potato lines requires targeting of a SNP-/insertion-/deletion–free DNA region. Haplotype diversity in potato was investigated by sequence comparison of the RH and DM genomes[3]. The latter revealed that SNPs occur every 40 bp and that indels, of an average length of 12.8 bp, arise every 394 bp. This frequency was even higher when comparing both RH haplotypes with 1 SNP per 29 bp and 1 indel per 253 bp. Furthermore, SNP-based analysis of 23 North American potato modern cultivars showed a population diversity (π) of 0.0105, which was significantly higher than previous resequencing studies of crops[16]. Therefore, determining both allelic variation of the target region (polymorphisms intrinsic to the studied potato line) and sequence divergence from the DM reference genome is essential for designing targets leading to homozygous gene editing in common tetraploid potato lines. Here we report on the NGS-based resequencing analysis of the widely used Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree. About 100 million reads were aligned on the DM reference genome prior to SNP-/Indel-calling. Combining variations within the genome of the potato cultivar Desiree (Desiree vs. Desiree) and variations between the DM reference genome and that of cv. Desiree (Desiree vs. DM), our analysis showed occurrences of 1 SNP/68 bp, 1 insertion/1173 bp and 1 deletion/1753 bp. Furthermore, we provide with a physical map of polymorphisms occurring within the assembled regions of each of the 12 Desiree chromosomes illustrating the heterogeneity of polymorphisms. In particular, polymorphism enrichment could be observed at the edges of chromosomes 7 and 10. On the other hand, variations were poorer in the central region of chromosome 7 and 12 as well as in the regions ranging from 10 to 60 Mb and 15 to 30 Mb of chromosome 1 and 3, respectively. Increasing the number of potential targets is essential to improve the success rate in tetra-allelic mutagenesis or in specific approaches such as CRISPR-driven base editing. Thus, polymorphisms intrinsic to the Desiree genome (Desiree vs. Desiree) were also investigated by filtering out divergences from the DM reference genome (Desiree vs. DM). This analysis revealed that 70% and 67% of the SNPs and indels, respectively, occurred within the genome of Desiree. Most importantly, this work represents an essential tool for high throughput functional genomic studies of the potato. This was illustrated by the knock-out mutagenesis of SS6, a recently discovered starch synthase isoform most likely involved in starch biosynthesis[2].

Results

In order to locate SNPs, insertions and deletions occurring in a commonly used tetraploid potato cultivar, leaf genomic DNA was isolated from in vitro cultivated cv. Desiree plants prior to genome resequencing. 99,713,534 reads of 2 × 150 bp were generated and mapped on the S. tuberosum Group Phureja DM1-3 Version 4.03 Pseudomolecule genome Sequence (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/pgsc_download.shtml)[3]. The percentage of mapped reads was 83.9%, corresponding to a mean coverage of almost 30X. This sequencing depth was similar to previous resequencing studies and allowed for confident identification of polymorphisms in tetraploid potato plants[3,16]. Variant calling analysis identified 11,939,720 SNPs, 707,507 insertions and 470,182 deletions. These variations included local sequence divergence between cv. Desiree and the DM reference (Desiree vs DM) and sequence polymorphism occurring between haplotypes of the Desiree tetraploid genome (Desiree vs. Desiree). The occurrence and distribution of these variations as well as the different types of nucleotide substitutions are summarized in Table 1. These data show that polymorphisms occur every 59 bp on average with SNPs being the predominant type of variation (Table 1). At the whole genome level, an average occurrence of one SNP every 68 bp was observed while indels were less frequent with one insertion or deletion per 1173bp and 1753bp, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, SNP occurrence was most prevalent on chromosome 11 with one SNP every 55bp while only one SNP per 92bp was observed on chromosome 10 (Table 1).
Table 1

Genetic variations in the genome of Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree mapped to that of Solanum Phureja (DM).

Chromosome length (Mbp)DeletionsInsertionsSNPsOccurrence (1 variation in every × bp)TransitionTransversion
DeletionInsertionSNPA/GC/TA/CT/AC/GG/T
Ch0048,012,04813,1941944942690836392469112124,265 (29.9%)125,239 (30.1%)44,168 (10.6%)54,178 (13.0%)24,484 (5.9%)43,681 (10.5%)
Ch0188,663,95257,42788,3701,541,3121544100358458,504 (30.6%)459,233 (30.7%)145,797 (9.7%)207,069 (13.8%)80,531 (5.4%)145,258 (9.7%)
Ch0248,614,68134,58952,865756,027140592064223,952 (30.6%)223,808 (30.6%)68,087 (9.3%)108,617 (14.9%)38,255 (5.2%)68,489 (9.4%)
Ch0362,290,28637,54759,237811,5421659105277241,589 (30.8%)240,680 (30.7%)72,951 (9.3%)116,763 (14.9%)40,263 (5.1%)72,989 (9.3%)
Ch0472,208,62144,06361,9171,089,3251639116666325,072 (30.8%)323,821 (30.7%)103,310 (9.8%)141,941 (13.4%)57,996 (5.5%)103,636 (9.8%)
Ch0552,070,15834,98850,794920,9981488102557277,313 (31.1%)275,880 (31.0%)85,192 (9.6%)119,421 (13.4%)46,925 (5.3%)85,859 (9.6%)
Ch0659,532,09642,17665,7291,008,413141290659303,836 (31.0%)302,651 (30.8%)92,649 (9.4%)138,366 (14.1%)51,404 (5.2%)92,783 (9.5%)
Ch0756,760,84335,82753,346880,4871584106464262,797 (30.7%)263,627 (30.8%)83,058 (9.7%)118,261 (13.8%)45,261 (5.3%)82,357 (9.6%)
Ch0856,938,45736,37855,110961,2711565103359288,083 (30.9%)289,812 (31.1%)89,489 (9.6%)127,602 (13.7%)48,198 (5.2%)89,661 (9.6%)
Ch0961,540,75137,85655,5361,020,0001626110860304,203 (30.7%)303,888 (30.6%)98,053 (9.9%)133,370 (13.4%)53,481 (5.4%)98,773 (10.0%)
Ch1059,756,22328,78540,510649,2202076147592195,481 (31.1%)194,222 (30.9%)59,943 (9.5%)85,473 (13.6%)33,620 (5.3%)59,798 (9.5%)
Ch1145,475,66731,57449,776822,217144091455248,611 (31.2%)247,285 (31.0%)74,917 (9.4%)111,633 (14.0%)40,400 (5.1%)75,111 (9.4%)
Ch1261,165,64935,77854,8681,052,0001710111558315,281 (30.8%)315,028 (30.8%)100,479 (9.8%)135,438 (13.3%)55,857 (5.5%)100,083 (9.8%)
Total773,029,432470,182707,50711,939,72017531173683,568,987 (30.8%)3,565,174 (30.8%)1,118,093 (9.7%)1,598,132 (13.8%)616,675 (5.3%)1,118,478 (9.7%)

The variants correspond to both local sequence divergence between cv. Desiree and the DM reference as well as to sequence polymorphism occurring between haplotypes of the Desiree tetraploid genome.

Genetic variations in the genome of Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree mapped to that of Solanum Phureja (DM). The variants correspond to both local sequence divergence between cv. Desiree and the DM reference as well as to sequence polymorphism occurring between haplotypes of the Desiree tetraploid genome. The genome-wide mean transition (A/G or T/C) to transversion (A/C, T/A, C/G or G/T) ratio was 1.603, which was consistent with a previous work[17]. Both types of transition (30.8% of the total SNPs) appeared at a similar frequency, with 3,568,987 A/G and 3,565,174 C/T transitions at the genome scale. Conversely, transversion occurrence varied according the nature of the substitution. T/A was the most frequent modification with 1598,132 events at the genome scale (13.8% of the total SNPs), while G/C transversions occurred 616,675 times (5.3% of the total SNPs). A/C and G/T transversions were present at intermediate and very similar frequencies with 1,118,093 and 1,118,478 events at the genome scale (9.65% of the total SNPs, respectively). In order to validate these data, the SNPs identified in this study where compared to the SolCAP Infinium High Confidence SNPs available at the PGSC website (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/pgsc_download.shtml). These data were produced by RNA-sequencing of Atlantic, Premier Russet, and Snowden potato cultivars. Our results corroborated 40501 of the 70326 SNPs present in the SolCAP database (Table 2). At the chromosome scale, the percentage of retrieved SNPs ranged from 45 to 72% for chromosome 2 and 6, respectively. Variants intrinsic to the Desiree genome were evaluated by filtering out the polymorphisms between cv. Desiree and the DM reference (Desiree vs. DM) that were homozygous in cv. Desiree (Desiree vs. Desiree) (Table 3). 7,768,568 SNPs and 713,986 indels were identified at the scale of the genome. The proportions of retrieved polymorphisms compared to the global analysis were 70% and 67% for SNPs and indels, respectively, at the scale of the genome thus confirming the strong intrinsic heterozygosity of the cultivar (Table 3). At the chromosomic scale, the proportions of retrieved SNPs ranged from 51% to 81% on chromosome 5 and 3, respectively, while retrieved indels ranged from 57% to 74% on the same chromosomes.
Table 2

Confirmed SNPs in comparison with previously identified SNPs in 3 different cultivars (Atlantic, Premier Russet and Snowden).

SolCAP SNPsConfirmed SNPsPercentage
Ch0077727635.52
Ch018562527961.66
Ch028217370845.13
Ch037092429460.55
Ch046168316851.36
Ch055706286850.26
Ch065178376472.69
Ch075610298853.26
Ch084829285059.02
Ch094905311863.57
Ch104001287571.86
Ch114615280660.80
Ch124666250753.73
Total70,32640,50157.59
Table 3

Analysis of polymorphisms intrinsic to Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree.

Desiree vs. DM + Desiree vs. DesireeDesiree vs. Desiree% of retrieved polymorphisms
SNPsIndelsSNPsIndelsSNPsIndels
Ch00403,64930,646241,56213,9936046
Ch011,439,553131,669959,93488,7416767
Ch02702,73178,552461,73154,6506670
Ch03758,72488,096614,30365,4068174
Ch041,024,12596,289672,61560,5916663
Ch05863,45578,184444,27344,9015157
Ch06941,86595,635665,62666,5877170
Ch07827,25380,630657,14757,4047971
Ch08884,15482,726598,20054,8226866
Ch09957,81784,646728,41860,0307671
Ch10612,06463,440398,62739,3016562
Ch11765,12273,019537,49550,1067069
Ch12986,05082,875788,63757,4548069
Total11,166,5621,066,4077,768,568713,9867067

Variations including both divergences between the reference genome (Desiree vs. DM) and the variability intrinsic to the Desiree genome (Desiree vs. Desiree) were compared with the intrinsic variability alone (Desiree vs. Desiree). The percentages of retrieved variations in Desiree vs. Desiree at the genome scale and for each chromosome are indicated.

Confirmed SNPs in comparison with previously identified SNPs in 3 different cultivars (Atlantic, Premier Russet and Snowden). Analysis of polymorphisms intrinsic to Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree. Variations including both divergences between the reference genome (Desiree vs. DM) and the variability intrinsic to the Desiree genome (Desiree vs. Desiree) were compared with the intrinsic variability alone (Desiree vs. Desiree). The percentages of retrieved variations in Desiree vs. Desiree at the genome scale and for each chromosome are indicated. To investigate the local distribution of polymorphisms, a physical map of the 12 potato chromosomes was constructed based on the DM reference genome (Fig. 1). Variant calling data were processed with the use of the “lattice” and “Sushi” R packages to illustrate polymorphism and gene densities (Fig. 1). As expected, gene density was greater at chromosome edges when compared to centromere regions (Fig. 1)[3]. Although not correlated at the scale of individual chromosomes, SNP and indel densities followed similar local distribution patterns (Fig. 1). Furthermore, polymorphism density was very low in some regions including the central part of chromosome 7 and 12 as well as in the regions ranging from 10 to 60 Mb and 15 to 30 Mb of chromosome 1 and 3, respectively (Fig. 1). On the other hand, SNP enrichment could be observed in some regions, especially at the edges of chromosome 7 and 10 (Fig. 1). Moreover, the global density of variations was correlated with gene density, particularly in chromosome 1, 4, and 12.
Figure 1

Physical polymorphism map of the potato cv. Desiree genome. Ideograms of the 12 pseudochromosomes of potato cv Desiree were schemed based on the released DM reference genome (3). Heat maps of gene density (genes.Mb−1) were constructed with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and are displayed within each chromosome. SNPs, insertions and deletions were identified by variant calling on sequence alignment of the resequenced Desiree cultivar and the DM reference genome. Polymorphism density was estimated with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and plotted next to each chromosome. The x-axis corresponds to SNP (green line), insertion (black line) and deletion (red line) densities displayed in number of variations.bp−1. Insertion and deletion densities were plotted with x-offsets of 2.10−8 and 4.10−8, respectively. The y-axis represents the length of each chromosome in Mb.

Physical polymorphism map of the potato cv. Desiree genome. Ideograms of the 12 pseudochromosomes of potato cv Desiree were schemed based on the released DM reference genome (3). Heat maps of gene density (genes.Mb−1) were constructed with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and are displayed within each chromosome. SNPs, insertions and deletions were identified by variant calling on sequence alignment of the resequenced Desiree cultivar and the DM reference genome. Polymorphism density was estimated with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and plotted next to each chromosome. The x-axis corresponds to SNP (green line), insertion (black line) and deletion (red line) densities displayed in number of variations.bp−1. Insertion and deletion densities were plotted with x-offsets of 2.10−8 and 4.10−8, respectively. The y-axis represents the length of each chromosome in Mb. In order to illustrate the efficiency of knowing which DNA regions should be avoided when designing gRNAs for tetra-allelic gene knockout in tetraploid potato, we used the data reported here to mutate the SS6 gene in S. tuberosum, cv. Desiree (Fig. 2). A target region (GT1), displaying good predicted efficiency and specificity for CRISPR/Cas9 gene inactivation, was identified in a polymorphism free sequence at the end of the second exon of the SS6 gene (Fig. 2a). The corresponding gRNA was cloned into pDIRECT_22a by golden gate reaction[18]. The latter construct was used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato explants and fourteen regenerated plant transformants were selected by PCR amplification of the Cas9 gene present on pDIRECT_22a. A second PCR amplification of the targeted region of SS6 was followed by Sanger sequencing and electrophoregram fitting analysis with the use of the ICE tool (https://ice.synthego.com/) (Fig. 2b,c). Among the fourteen transformed plants, seven (SS6-GT1-1 to SS6-GT1-7) showed a coefficient of determination (R2) above 0.9 accompanied by KO (knock-out) -scores ranging from 89 to 99 (Fig. 2b). The seven other transformants (SS6-GT1-8 to SS6-GT1-14) displayed a R2 ranging from 0.52 to 0.82 and KO-scores between 31 and 72 (Fig. 2b). While the probability that lines SS6-GT1-1 to SS6-GT1-7 are knock out mutants is very high, only SS6-GT1-1 harbored the same mutation on each of the four SS6 alleles resulting in a clear non-superimposed electrophoregram with a 4bp deletion at the site of predicted DSB (Fig. 2b,c). On the other hand, lines SS6-GT1-2 to -7 carried a mix of predicted indels of one or two bp in length (Fig. 2b).
Figure 2

Targeted knock-out mutagenesis of the SS6 gene in the tetraploid potato, cv. Desiree. (a) Schematic representation of the SS6 CDS organization. Gene coordinates on chromosome 7 are indicated at the top of the figure. The inset shows an enlargement of the four first SS6 exons and the position of the targeted sequence GT1 (green arrow). Sequence polymorphisms are indicated by orange signs. Straight line ticks correspond to substitutions or deletions. Broken line ticks correspond to insertions. Sanger sequencing of the PCR amplification products of SS6 from transformed plants was performed unidirectionally. The location of the primer is indicated by a red arrow. (b) List of the genetically modified plants and the corresponding model fitting, K.O. (knock-out) mutations scores and predicted major indels obtained from the ICE tool analysis. (c) Sequence analysis of the targeted SS6 region in the wild-type (SS6-GT1-WT) and 14 genetically transformed plants (SS6-GT-1 to -14). The electrophoregrams were obtained by Sanger sequencing. The sequences from SS6-GT1-2 to SS6-GT1-14 display superimposed electrophoregram signals caused by the heterogeneity of the indel mutations among the four gene copies. On the other hand, SS6-GT1-WT harbors a unique electrophoregram indicating the homozygosity of the wild type allele and SS6-GT1-1 shows homozygosity for a 4 bp deletion at the predicted double-strand break (DSB) site. The gRNA is depicted in green. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif.

Targeted knock-out mutagenesis of the SS6 gene in the tetraploid potato, cv. Desiree. (a) Schematic representation of the SS6 CDS organization. Gene coordinates on chromosome 7 are indicated at the top of the figure. The inset shows an enlargement of the four first SS6 exons and the position of the targeted sequence GT1 (green arrow). Sequence polymorphisms are indicated by orange signs. Straight line ticks correspond to substitutions or deletions. Broken line ticks correspond to insertions. Sanger sequencing of the PCR amplification products of SS6 from transformed plants was performed unidirectionally. The location of the primer is indicated by a red arrow. (b) List of the genetically modified plants and the corresponding model fitting, K.O. (knock-out) mutations scores and predicted major indels obtained from the ICE tool analysis. (c) Sequence analysis of the targeted SS6 region in the wild-type (SS6-GT1-WT) and 14 genetically transformed plants (SS6-GT-1 to -14). The electrophoregrams were obtained by Sanger sequencing. The sequences from SS6-GT1-2 to SS6-GT1-14 display superimposed electrophoregram signals caused by the heterogeneity of the indel mutations among the four gene copies. On the other hand, SS6-GT1-WT harbors a unique electrophoregram indicating the homozygosity of the wild type allele and SS6-GT1-1 shows homozygosity for a 4 bp deletion at the predicted double-strand break (DSB) site. The gRNA is depicted in green. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif.

Discussion

Regardless of the genome editing strategy, targeting a polymorphism-free DNA region is crucial for generating tetra-allelic mutations in heterozygous polyploids. In functional genomic approaches, target design is commonly performed based on the released genome sequence of the organism. The available sequence of the potato genome was obtained from a homozygous doubled-monoploid (DM) and a heterozygous diploid (RH) clone. In the present study, we resequenced that of the laboratory cultivar Desiree which was historically chosen for its ease of transformation and is still widely used for biomolecular studies of the potato. Variant calling analysis showed occurrences of 1 SNP/68 bp, 1 insertion/1173 bp and 1 deletion/1753 bp. These variations comprised both sequence divergences from the reference genome (Desiree vs. DM) and the variability intrinsic to the Desiree genome (Desiree vs. Desiree). Sequence variations between Desiree and DM genomes have to be taken into account for determining DNA binding sequences in gene editing approaches. However, when these polymorphisms are homozygous within the studied potato line, sequences overlapping the corresponding positions can be designed as targets for homozygous gene editing. Thus, we filtered out the polymorphisms between cv. Desiree and the DM reference (Desiree vs. DM) that were homozygous in cv. Desiree (Desiree vs. Desiree). 70% and 67% for SNPs and indels, respectively, were retrieved in this analysis indicating that particular attention must be paid during target design for multiallelic gene editing of potato. For instance, inducing DSBs with the use of CRISPR/Cas9 requires designing a ≈20bp guide sequence (gRNA) to pair with target DNA. The presence of SNPs or Indels within the targeted sequence alters the binding of gRNAs thus misbalancing the on-/off-target Cas9 activity. Individual gene sequencing can be performed to overcome this issue. However, this approach is time consuming and not compatible with high throughput functional genomics. Here, we used these data to select a target region free of variants for inactivating the SS6 gene by CRISPR/Cas9. Among fourteen transformed plants, seven showed a very high probability of knock-out mutation on each of the four SS6 alleles. Moreover, one mutant line contained identical deletions on each of the four chromosomes. Further investigation of the starch structure and morphology from these mutant lines will reveal the function of SS6 that remains to be deciphered. Furthermore, the inactivation of this enzyme may lead to modifications of starch properties potentially resulting in industrial applications. The data reported here will allow improving the design workflows for gene editing of the routinely used cultivar Desiree. Potato is the fourth most important staple crop in the world implying important breeding efforts in a climate changing context concomitant with increasing global population. Thus, accelerating research on potato genetics and physiology will likely lead to key fundamental discoveries as well as important industrial applications.

Methods

Plant material and growth condition

Explants of Solanum tuberosum cultivar Desiree were provided by the biological resource center BrACySol (IGEPP INRA). Plants were cultivated on Murashige and skoog medium[19] including vitamins and 8 g.l−1 Plant Agar (Duchefa®) in a growth chamber with a 16h-light (80 µmol.m−2.s−1)/8h-dark photoperiod, at 20 °C during 3 weeks. Plants were propagated in vitro every 3 weeks by transplantation of the terminal bud.

Sample preparation and resequencing

Leaf DNA from tetraploïd Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree was extracted with the use of the Nucleospin plant II kit (Macherey Nagel). A shotgun library was constructed from 100 ng of DNA using “Truseq DNA nano sample prep” (Illumina Inc.). Validation was then realized using the “DNA HS Assay kit” (Agilent). Mean size of fragments was 550 bp. The library was then sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generating 99,713,534 paired-end reads of 2 × 150bp corresponding to a 35X mean coverage of the 844 Mb potato genome. Read quality have been analyzed using FastQC v0.11.5, giving 90.44% of reads with a Phred Q quality score >30.

Read alignment and variant calling

The following steps were performed using the Geneious 11.1.2 software (https://www.geneious.com)[20]. Poor quality data were trimmed from the ends of the paired reads with an error probability limit of 0.05. Paired reads were then mapped to the reference genome pseudomolecules using bowtie2 mapper[21] set to high sensitivity resulting in the assembly of 167,343,472 of the 199,427,068 reads on 13 contigs. Variant calling was performed on the whole assembled contigs using the Geneious variant finder tool with the following settings: variations positions must be covered by at least 8 reads with a frequency above 0.05. The variant P-value and the strand-bias P-value limits were set to 10−5. This first analysis combined variations within the genome of the potato cultivar Desiree (Desiree vs. Desiree) and variations between the DM reference genome and that of cv. Desiree (Desiree vs. DM). A second analysis was performed as described above except that the divergences from the DM reference genome (Desiree vs. DM) were filtered out by excluding the reference sequence in the variant calling analysis.

Target design and plasmid construction

The full CDS of StSS6, located on chromosome 7 (position 40,939,715 to 40,924,572, PGSC_DM_v4.03_pseudomolecules, http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/) was reconstructed using the CDS of the SS6 gene from Solanum lycopersicum (accession number: Solyc07g042830.2, http://solgenomics.net) as a template. Both genomic regions were aligned in Geneious 11.1.2 and the partially annotated CDS from S. tuberosum (position 40,939,715 to 40,932,630, accession number: PGSC0003DMG402013540, http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/) described in[22] was extended according to the corresponding gene structure of S. lycopersicum. Intron splicing signals were positioned with respect to the tomato gene and gene structure was confirmed by in silico translation of the complete CDS. The obtained protein sequence displayed 100% identity with the full length annotated SS6 protein sequence (XP_006353746.1, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/). The targeted sequence for the inactivation of SS6 (GT1: 5′-GCATCCATTCAAGGCAAGCA-3′) was defined to meet with a high predicted efficiency (activity score of 0.69) and specificity (score of 100%) with the use of the geneious 11.1.2 software and a frame shift probability (microscore of 67.15) using the CRISPR-P toolbox (http://crispr.hzau.edu.cn/CRISPR2/). To favor targeting of the four SS6 alleles, the absence of polymorphisms in the targeted sequence was confirmed using the variant calling data generated in this study. The gRNA was cloned into the pDIRECT_22a plasmid by golden gate reaction using the AtU6 sense gRNA (5′-GATTGCATCCATTCAAGGCAAGCA) and antisense gRNA (5′-AAACTGCTTGCCTTGAATGGATGC) oligonucleotides purchased from Eurogentec (Belgium) and according to protocol 2B from[18]. The resulting vector pDIRECT_22a:GT1 contained a kanamycin resistance gene, a plant codon-optimized Cas9 gene and the sgRNA targeting the GT1 sequence of SS6.

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58pMP90 was transformed with the pDIRECT-22a:GT1 plasmid and cultivated during 48 h at 28 °C in LB medium containing 50 mg/L rifampicin, 25 mg/L gentamicin and 50 mg/L spectinomycin. Potato (cv. Desiree) plants were cultivated on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with vitamins (Duchefa, The Netherlands) and containing 2% sucrose (medium A) with a photoperiod of 16-h light (65 µmol photons.m2.sec−1)/8-h dark at 20 °C. Stem and petiole explants were cut from 4-week-old plants prior to incubation on sterile MS plates including vitamins (Duchefa, The Netherlands), 2% sucrose, 1 mg/L indole-3-acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 1 mg/L zeatin-riboside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 1 mg/L gibberellin A3 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (medium B) during 24h in the same conditions of light and temperature. Explants were then dipped in a suspension of A. tumefaciens containing pDIRECT-22a-GT1 (OD600 = 0.2) prior to incubation on medium B at 25 °C in the dark during 48 h. Explants were washed with sterile water and 1X MS medium containing 2% sucrose, 500 mg/L cefotaxime, 500 mg/L Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and 50 mg/L kanamycin prior to be placed on solid medium B during 2 weeks under the aforementioned conditions until the apparition of calli. Explants were then subcultured every two weeks on medium C (same as medium B with a 10-fold decreased concentration of Indolo-3-acetic acid) until shoot regeneration.

Plant selection and genotyping

Regenerated shoots were isolated and cultivated on solid medium A. Mature leaves from 14 transformed plants were cut and genomic DNA was isolated using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method[23]. In order to confirm the integration of the plasmid, the Cas9 gene was amplified by PCR using the following primers: Cas9For: 5-TTCGGGCGTTCCAGTGATAC-3, Cas9-rev: 5-TATGGTGTGCAACGGTCTCC-3 and the DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts). The following parameters were used for PCR reaction: denaturation for 2 min at 95 °C; 30 consecutive cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 25 sec; and finally elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. The presence of mutations on the targeted sequence was investigated by PCR amplification using the following primers: GT1For: 5-TTCGGGCGTTCCAGTGATAC-3, GT1Rev: 5-TATGGTGTGCAACGGTCTCC-3 and the high fidelity DNA polymerase (kappa hifi, Roche, Basle, Switzerland) with the following parameters: denaturation for 2 min at 95 °C; 30 consecutive cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 25 sec. The PCR products were sequenced by the Sanger method using GT1Rev: 5-TATGGTGTGCAACGGTCTCC-3 (Eurofins genomics, Ebersberg, Germany). Sequencing data were analyzed by comparison with the corresponding electrophoregram of the wild-type sequence using the ICE tool available at https://ice.synthego.com/.
  21 in total

1.  Improving cold storage and processing traits in potato through targeted gene knockout.

Authors:  Benjamin M Clasen; Thomas J Stoddard; Song Luo; Zachary L Demorest; Jin Li; Frederic Cedrone; Redeat Tibebu; Shawn Davison; Erin E Ray; Aurelie Daulhac; Andrew Coffman; Ann Yabandith; Adam Retterath; William Haun; Nicholas J Baltes; Luc Mathis; Daniel F Voytas; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  The future of CRISPR technologies in agriculture.

Authors:  Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery.

Authors:  Mariette Andersson; Helle Turesson; Niklas Olsson; Ann-Sofie Fält; Pia Ohlsson; Matías N Gonzalez; Mathias Samuelsson; Per Hofvander
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.500

4.  A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants.

Authors:  Tomáš Čermák; Shaun J Curtin; Javier Gil-Humanes; Radim Čegan; Thomas J Y Kono; Eva Konečná; Joseph J Belanto; Colby G Starker; Jade W Mathre; Rebecca L Greenstein; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  The Solanum tuberosum GBSSI gene: a target for assessing gene and base editing in tetraploid potato.

Authors:  Florian Veillet; Laura Chauvin; Marie-Paule Kermarrec; François Sevestre; Mathilde Merrer; Zoé Terret; Nicolas Szydlowski; Pierre Devaux; Jean-Luc Gallois; Jean-Eric Chauvin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato.

Authors:  Xun Xu; Shengkai Pan; Shifeng Cheng; Bo Zhang; Desheng Mu; Peixiang Ni; Gengyun Zhang; Shuang Yang; Ruiqiang Li; Jun Wang; Gisella Orjeda; Frank Guzman; Michael Torres; Roberto Lozano; Olga Ponce; Diana Martinez; Germán De la Cruz; S K Chakrabarti; Virupaksh U Patil; Konstantin G Skryabin; Boris B Kuznetsov; Nikolai V Ravin; Tatjana V Kolganova; Alexey V Beletsky; Andrei V Mardanov; Alex Di Genova; Daniel M Bolser; David M A Martin; Guangcun Li; Yu Yang; Hanhui Kuang; Qun Hu; Xingyao Xiong; Gerard J Bishop; Boris Sagredo; Nilo Mejía; Wlodzimierz Zagorski; Robert Gromadka; Jan Gawor; Pawel Szczesny; Sanwen Huang; Zhonghua Zhang; Chunbo Liang; Jun He; Ying Li; Ying He; Jianfei Xu; Youjun Zhang; Binyan Xie; Yongchen Du; Dongyu Qu; Merideth Bonierbale; Marc Ghislain; Maria del Rosario Herrera; Giovanni Giuliano; Marco Pietrella; Gaetano Perrotta; Paolo Facella; Kimberly O'Brien; Sergio E Feingold; Leandro E Barreiro; Gabriela A Massa; Luis Diambra; Brett R Whitty; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Haining Lin; Alicia N Massa; Michael Geoffroy; Steven Lundback; Dean DellaPenna; C Robin Buell; Sanjeev Kumar Sharma; David F Marshall; Robbie Waugh; Glenn J Bryan; Marialaura Destefanis; Istvan Nagy; Dan Milbourne; Susan J Thomson; Mark Fiers; Jeanne M E Jacobs; Kåre L Nielsen; Mads Sønderkær; Marina Iovene; Giovana A Torres; Jiming Jiang; Richard E Veilleux; Christian W B Bachem; Jan de Boer; Theo Borm; Bjorn Kloosterman; Herman van Eck; Erwin Datema; Bas te Lintel Hekkert; Aska Goverse; Roeland C H J van Ham; Richard G F Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics.

Authors:  A Pereira
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.145

8.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Zhengyan Feng; Botao Zhang; Wona Ding; Xiaodong Liu; Dong-Lei Yang; Pengliang Wei; Fengqiu Cao; Shihua Zhu; Feng Zhang; Yanfei Mao; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Genome diversity of tuber-bearing Solanum uncovers complex evolutionary history and targets of domestication in the cultivated potato.

Authors:  Michael A Hardigan; F Parker E Laimbeer; Linsey Newton; Emily Crisovan; John P Hamilton; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Krystle Wiegert-Rininger; Joshua C Wood; David S Douches; Eva M Farré; Richard E Veilleux; C Robin Buell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mutations introduced in susceptibility genes through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing confer increased late blight resistance in potatoes.

Authors:  Nam Phuong Kieu; Marit Lenman; Eu Sheng Wang; Bent Larsen Petersen; Erik Andreasson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing in Potato: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jagesh Kumar Tiwari; Tanuja Buckseth; Clarissa Challam; Rasna Zinta; Nisha Bhatia; Dalamu Dalamu; Sharmistha Naik; Anuj K Poonia; Rajesh K Singh; Satish K Luthra; Vinod Kumar; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  The caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase gene SNP replacement in Russet Burbank potato variety enhances late blight resistance through cell wall reinforcement.

Authors:  Niranjan Hegde; Sripad Joshi; Nancy Soni; Ajjamada C Kushalappa
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.570

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.