| Literature DB >> 32029861 |
François Sevestre1, Maud Facon1, Fabrice Wattebled1, Nicolas Szydlowski2,3.
Abstract
Genome editing is a powerful tool for plant functional genomics allowing for multiallelic targeted mutagenesis. The recent development of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) systems for gene editing in plants allows for simple, cost-effective introduction of site-specific double-stranded DNA breaks. The nuclear genomes of a homozygous doubled-monoploid potato clone (DM) and a heterozygous diploid clone (RH) have been sequenced in 2011. However, common potato cultivars display a highly heterozygous autotetraploid genome thus complicating target design for tetra-allelic gene editing. Here, we report on the SNP physical map of the widely used Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree and on the position of the diverse indels providing an essential tool for target design in genome editing approaches. We used this tool for designing a specific gRNA and successfully knocking-out a newly discovered starch synthase gene (SS6) in potato. Resequencing data are publicly available at the Sequence Read Archive of the NCBI (accession number: PRJNA507597) and will represent a valuable resource for functional genomic studies of various metabolic pathways, cell and plant physiology as well as high-throughput reverse genetics in potato.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32029861 PMCID: PMC7005264 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58985-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Genetic variations in the genome of Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree mapped to that of Solanum Phureja (DM).
| Chromosome length (Mbp) | Deletions | Insertions | SNPs | Occurrence (1 variation in every × bp) | Transition | Transversion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deletion | Insertion | SNP | A/G | C/T | A/C | T/A | C/G | G/T | |||||
| Ch00 | 48,012,048 | 13,194 | 19449 | 426908 | 3639 | 2469 | 112 | 124,265 (29.9%) | 125,239 (30.1%) | 44,168 (10.6%) | 54,178 (13.0%) | 24,484 (5.9%) | 43,681 (10.5%) |
| Ch01 | 88,663,952 | 57,427 | 88,370 | 1,541,312 | 1544 | 1003 | 58 | 458,504 (30.6%) | 459,233 (30.7%) | 145,797 (9.7%) | 207,069 (13.8%) | 80,531 (5.4%) | 145,258 (9.7%) |
| Ch02 | 48,614,681 | 34,589 | 52,865 | 756,027 | 1405 | 920 | 64 | 223,952 (30.6%) | 223,808 (30.6%) | 68,087 (9.3%) | 108,617 (14.9%) | 38,255 (5.2%) | 68,489 (9.4%) |
| Ch03 | 62,290,286 | 37,547 | 59,237 | 811,542 | 1659 | 1052 | 77 | 241,589 (30.8%) | 240,680 (30.7%) | 72,951 (9.3%) | 116,763 (14.9%) | 40,263 (5.1%) | 72,989 (9.3%) |
| Ch04 | 72,208,621 | 44,063 | 61,917 | 1,089,325 | 1639 | 1166 | 66 | 325,072 (30.8%) | 323,821 (30.7%) | 103,310 (9.8%) | 141,941 (13.4%) | 57,996 (5.5%) | 103,636 (9.8%) |
| Ch05 | 52,070,158 | 34,988 | 50,794 | 920,998 | 1488 | 1025 | 57 | 277,313 (31.1%) | 275,880 (31.0%) | 85,192 (9.6%) | 119,421 (13.4%) | 46,925 (5.3%) | 85,859 (9.6%) |
| Ch06 | 59,532,096 | 42,176 | 65,729 | 1,008,413 | 1412 | 906 | 59 | 303,836 (31.0%) | 302,651 (30.8%) | 92,649 (9.4%) | 138,366 (14.1%) | 51,404 (5.2%) | 92,783 (9.5%) |
| Ch07 | 56,760,843 | 35,827 | 53,346 | 880,487 | 1584 | 1064 | 64 | 262,797 (30.7%) | 263,627 (30.8%) | 83,058 (9.7%) | 118,261 (13.8%) | 45,261 (5.3%) | 82,357 (9.6%) |
| Ch08 | 56,938,457 | 36,378 | 55,110 | 961,271 | 1565 | 1033 | 59 | 288,083 (30.9%) | 289,812 (31.1%) | 89,489 (9.6%) | 127,602 (13.7%) | 48,198 (5.2%) | 89,661 (9.6%) |
| Ch09 | 61,540,751 | 37,856 | 55,536 | 1,020,000 | 1626 | 1108 | 60 | 304,203 (30.7%) | 303,888 (30.6%) | 98,053 (9.9%) | 133,370 (13.4%) | 53,481 (5.4%) | 98,773 (10.0%) |
| Ch10 | 59,756,223 | 28,785 | 40,510 | 649,220 | 2076 | 1475 | 92 | 195,481 (31.1%) | 194,222 (30.9%) | 59,943 (9.5%) | 85,473 (13.6%) | 33,620 (5.3%) | 59,798 (9.5%) |
| Ch11 | 45,475,667 | 31,574 | 49,776 | 822,217 | 1440 | 914 | 55 | 248,611 (31.2%) | 247,285 (31.0%) | 74,917 (9.4%) | 111,633 (14.0%) | 40,400 (5.1%) | 75,111 (9.4%) |
| Ch12 | 61,165,649 | 35,778 | 54,868 | 1,052,000 | 1710 | 1115 | 58 | 315,281 (30.8%) | 315,028 (30.8%) | 100,479 (9.8%) | 135,438 (13.3%) | 55,857 (5.5%) | 100,083 (9.8%) |
| Total | 773,029,432 | 470,182 | 707,507 | 11,939,720 | 1753 | 1173 | 68 | 3,568,987 (30.8%) | 3,565,174 (30.8%) | 1,118,093 (9.7%) | 1,598,132 (13.8%) | 616,675 (5.3%) | 1,118,478 (9.7%) |
The variants correspond to both local sequence divergence between cv. Desiree and the DM reference as well as to sequence polymorphism occurring between haplotypes of the Desiree tetraploid genome.
Confirmed SNPs in comparison with previously identified SNPs in 3 different cultivars (Atlantic, Premier Russet and Snowden).
| SolCAP SNPs | Confirmed SNPs | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch00 | 777 | 276 | 35.52 |
| Ch01 | 8562 | 5279 | 61.66 |
| Ch02 | 8217 | 3708 | 45.13 |
| Ch03 | 7092 | 4294 | 60.55 |
| Ch04 | 6168 | 3168 | 51.36 |
| Ch05 | 5706 | 2868 | 50.26 |
| Ch06 | 5178 | 3764 | 72.69 |
| Ch07 | 5610 | 2988 | 53.26 |
| Ch08 | 4829 | 2850 | 59.02 |
| Ch09 | 4905 | 3118 | 63.57 |
| Ch10 | 4001 | 2875 | 71.86 |
| Ch11 | 4615 | 2806 | 60.80 |
| Ch12 | 4666 | 2507 | 53.73 |
| Total | 70,326 | 40,501 | 57.59 |
Analysis of polymorphisms intrinsic to Solanum tuberosum cv. Desiree.
| Desiree vs. DM + Desiree vs. Desiree | Desiree vs. Desiree | % of retrieved polymorphisms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPs | Indels | SNPs | Indels | SNPs | Indels | |
| Ch00 | 403,649 | 30,646 | 241,562 | 13,993 | 60 | 46 |
| Ch01 | 1,439,553 | 131,669 | 959,934 | 88,741 | 67 | 67 |
| Ch02 | 702,731 | 78,552 | 461,731 | 54,650 | 66 | 70 |
| Ch03 | 758,724 | 88,096 | 614,303 | 65,406 | 81 | 74 |
| Ch04 | 1,024,125 | 96,289 | 672,615 | 60,591 | 66 | 63 |
| Ch05 | 863,455 | 78,184 | 444,273 | 44,901 | 51 | 57 |
| Ch06 | 941,865 | 95,635 | 665,626 | 66,587 | 71 | 70 |
| Ch07 | 827,253 | 80,630 | 657,147 | 57,404 | 79 | 71 |
| Ch08 | 884,154 | 82,726 | 598,200 | 54,822 | 68 | 66 |
| Ch09 | 957,817 | 84,646 | 728,418 | 60,030 | 76 | 71 |
| Ch10 | 612,064 | 63,440 | 398,627 | 39,301 | 65 | 62 |
| Ch11 | 765,122 | 73,019 | 537,495 | 50,106 | 70 | 69 |
| Ch12 | 986,050 | 82,875 | 788,637 | 57,454 | 80 | 69 |
| Total | 11,166,562 | 1,066,407 | 7,768,568 | 713,986 | 70 | 67 |
Variations including both divergences between the reference genome (Desiree vs. DM) and the variability intrinsic to the Desiree genome (Desiree vs. Desiree) were compared with the intrinsic variability alone (Desiree vs. Desiree). The percentages of retrieved variations in Desiree vs. Desiree at the genome scale and for each chromosome are indicated.
Figure 1Physical polymorphism map of the potato cv. Desiree genome. Ideograms of the 12 pseudochromosomes of potato cv Desiree were schemed based on the released DM reference genome (3). Heat maps of gene density (genes.Mb−1) were constructed with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and are displayed within each chromosome. SNPs, insertions and deletions were identified by variant calling on sequence alignment of the resequenced Desiree cultivar and the DM reference genome. Polymorphism density was estimated with the use of the “lattice” (densityplot function) and “Sushi” (plotbed function) R packages and plotted next to each chromosome. The x-axis corresponds to SNP (green line), insertion (black line) and deletion (red line) densities displayed in number of variations.bp−1. Insertion and deletion densities were plotted with x-offsets of 2.10−8 and 4.10−8, respectively. The y-axis represents the length of each chromosome in Mb.
Figure 2Targeted knock-out mutagenesis of the SS6 gene in the tetraploid potato, cv. Desiree. (a) Schematic representation of the SS6 CDS organization. Gene coordinates on chromosome 7 are indicated at the top of the figure. The inset shows an enlargement of the four first SS6 exons and the position of the targeted sequence GT1 (green arrow). Sequence polymorphisms are indicated by orange signs. Straight line ticks correspond to substitutions or deletions. Broken line ticks correspond to insertions. Sanger sequencing of the PCR amplification products of SS6 from transformed plants was performed unidirectionally. The location of the primer is indicated by a red arrow. (b) List of the genetically modified plants and the corresponding model fitting, K.O. (knock-out) mutations scores and predicted major indels obtained from the ICE tool analysis. (c) Sequence analysis of the targeted SS6 region in the wild-type (SS6-GT1-WT) and 14 genetically transformed plants (SS6-GT-1 to -14). The electrophoregrams were obtained by Sanger sequencing. The sequences from SS6-GT1-2 to SS6-GT1-14 display superimposed electrophoregram signals caused by the heterogeneity of the indel mutations among the four gene copies. On the other hand, SS6-GT1-WT harbors a unique electrophoregram indicating the homozygosity of the wild type allele and SS6-GT1-1 shows homozygosity for a 4 bp deletion at the predicted double-strand break (DSB) site. The gRNA is depicted in green. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif.