Ali Aminian1, Alexander Zajichek2, David E Arterburn3, Kathy E Wolski4, Stacy A Brethauer5,6, Philip R Schauer5,7, Steven E Nissen4, Michael W Kattan2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH aminiaa@ccf.org. 2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 3. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 5. Department of General Surgery, Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 6. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. 7. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To construct and internally validate prediction models to estimate the risk of long-term end-organ complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity that can be used to inform treatment decisions for patients and practitioners who are considering metabolic surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2,287 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent metabolic surgery between 1998 and 2017 in the Cleveland Clinic Health System were propensity-matched 1:5 to 11,435 nonsurgical patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes who received usual care with follow-up through December 2018. Multivariable time-to-event regression and random forest machine learning models were built and internally validated using fivefold cross-validation to predict the 10-year risk for four outcomes of interest. The prediction models were programmed to construct user-friendly web-based and smartphone applications of Individualized Diabetes Complications (IDC) Risk Scores for clinical use. RESULTS: The prediction tools demonstrated the following discrimination ability based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (1 = perfect discrimination and 0.5 = chance) at 10 years in the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively: all-cause mortality (0.79 and 0.81), coronary artery events (0.66 and 0.67), heart failure (0.73 and 0.75), and nephropathy (0.73 and 0.76). When a patient's data are entered into the IDC application, it estimates the individualized 10-year morbidity and mortality risks with and without undergoing metabolic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The IDC Risk Scores can provide personalized evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about future cardiovascular outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery based on their current status of obesity, diabetes, and related cardiometabolic conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To construct and internally validate prediction models to estimate the risk of long-term end-organ complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity that can be used to inform treatment decisions for patients and practitioners who are considering metabolic surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2,287 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent metabolic surgery between 1998 and 2017 in the Cleveland Clinic Health System were propensity-matched 1:5 to 11,435 nonsurgical patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes who received usual care with follow-up through December 2018. Multivariable time-to-event regression and random forest machine learning models were built and internally validated using fivefold cross-validation to predict the 10-year risk for four outcomes of interest. The prediction models were programmed to construct user-friendly web-based and smartphone applications of Individualized Diabetes Complications (IDC) Risk Scores for clinical use. RESULTS: The prediction tools demonstrated the following discrimination ability based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (1 = perfect discrimination and 0.5 = chance) at 10 years in the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively: all-cause mortality (0.79 and 0.81), coronary artery events (0.66 and 0.67), heart failure (0.73 and 0.75), and nephropathy (0.73 and 0.76). When a patient's data are entered into the IDC application, it estimates the individualized 10-year morbidity and mortality risks with and without undergoing metabolic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The IDC Risk Scores can provide personalized evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about future cardiovascular outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery based on their current status of obesity, diabetes, and related cardiometabolic conditions.
Authors: David P Fisher; Eric Johnson; Sebastien Haneuse; David Arterburn; Karen J Coleman; Patrick J O'Connor; Rebecca O'Brien; Andy Bogart; Mary Kay Theis; Jane Anau; Emily B Schroeder; Stephen Sidney Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Geltrude Mingrone; Simona Panunzi; Andrea De Gaetano; Caterina Guidone; Amerigo Iaconelli; Giuseppe Nanni; Marco Castagneto; Stefan Bornstein; Francesco Rubino Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sayeed Ikramuddin; Judith Korner; Wei-Jei Lee; Avis J Thomas; John E Connett; John P Bantle; Daniel B Leslie; Qi Wang; William B Inabnet; Robert W Jeffery; Keong Chong; Lee-Ming Chuang; Michael D Jensen; Adrian Vella; Leaque Ahmed; Kumar Belani; Charles J Billington Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ali Aminian; Alexander Zajichek; David E Arterburn; Kathy E Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Philip R Schauer; Michael W Kattan; Steven E Nissen Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laura N McEwen; Andrew J Karter; Beth E Waitzfelder; Jesse C Crosson; David G Marrero; Carol M Mangione; William H Herman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Brian J Wells; Anil Jain; Susana Arrigain; Changhong Yu; Wayne A Rosenkrans; Michael W Kattan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Salvatore De Cosmo; Massimiliano Copetti; Olga Lamacchia; Andrea Fontana; Michela Massa; Eleonora Morini; Antonio Pacilli; Stefania Fariello; Antonio Palena; Anna Rauseo; Rafaella Viti; Rosa Di Paola; Claudia Menzaghi; Mauro Cignarelli; Fabio Pellegrini; Vincenzo Trischitta Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Brian A Bergmark; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow; Ph Gabriel Steg; Yared Gurmu; Avivit Cahn; Ofri Mosenzon; Itamar Raz; Erin Bohula; Benjamin M Scirica Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sanjay Basu; Jeremy B Sussman; Seth A Berkowitz; Rodney A Hayward; Alain G Bertoni; Adolfo Correa; Stanford Mwasongwe; John S Yudkin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mustafa Bektaş; Beata M M Reiber; Jaime Costa Pereira; George L Burchell; Donald L van der Peet Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Puguang Xie; Yuyao Li; Bo Deng; Chenzhen Du; Shunli Rui; Wu Deng; Min Wang; Johnson Boey; David G Armstrong; Yu Ma; Wuquan Deng Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 3.099