| Literature DB >> 32029591 |
Derek R Morim1, Amos Meeks2, Ankita Shastri3, Andy Tran1, Anna V Shneidman2,4, Victor V Yashin5, Fariha Mahmood1, Anna C Balazs5, Joanna Aizenberg6,3,4, Kalaichelvi Saravanamuttu7.
Abstract
Next-generation photonics envisions circuitry-free, rapidly reconfigurable systems powered by solitonic beams of self-trapped light and their particlelike interactions. Progress, however, has been limited by the need for reversibly responsive materials that host such nonlinear optical waves. We find that repeatedly switchable self-trapped visible laser beams, which exhibit strong pairwise interactions, can be generated in a photoresponsive hydrogel. Through comprehensive experiments and simulations, we show that the unique nonlinear conditions arise when photoisomerization of spiropyran substituents in pH-responsive poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogel transduces optical energy into mechanical deformation of the 3D cross-linked hydrogel matrix. A Gaussian beam self-traps when localized isomerization-induced contraction of the hydrogel and expulsion of water generates a transient waveguide, which entraps the optical field and suppresses divergence. The waveguide is erased and reformed within seconds when the optical field is sequentially removed and reintroduced, allowing the self-trapped beam to be rapidly and repeatedly switched on and off at remarkably low powers in the milliwatt regime. Furthermore, this opto-chemo-mechanical transduction of energy mediated by the 3D cross-linked hydrogel network facilitates pairwise interactions between self-trapped beams both in the short range where there is significant overlap of their optical fields, and even in the long range--over separation distances of up to 10 times the beam width--where such overlap is negligible.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic optics; nonlinear dynamics; photochromic gels; self-trapped beams; spiropyran
Year: 2020 PMID: 32029591 PMCID: PMC7049136 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902872117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.SP-modified hydrogels. (A) Photoisomerization scheme of chromophore substituents from the protonated merocyanine (MCH+, Left) to SP (Right) forms in the methylenebis(acrylamide) cross-linked p(AAm-co-AAc) hydrogel. (B) Photographs of chromophore-containing p(AAm-co-AAc) hydrogel monoliths employed in experiments. (C) UV-visible absorbance spectra demonstrating reversible isomerization of MCH+ (absorption λmax = 420 nm) to SP (λmax = 320 nm) in solution. (D) Experimental setup (Top) to probe laser self-trapping due to photoinduced local contraction of the hydrogel, schematically depicted on the Bottom (see also Movie S1). A laser beam is focused onto the entrance face of the hydrogel while its exit face is imaged onto a CCD camera.
Fig. 2.Evolution of self-trapping in the SP-modified hydrogel; experiments and simulations. (A) Experimentally measured temporal evolution of peak intensity (blue) and effective width (red) of a laser beam (532 nm, 6.0 mW, with a width of 20 μm––corresponding peak intensity = 3.77 kW cm−2) acquired at the sample exit face; the beam is turned on at t = 0. Breaks in plots are time lapses between image logs. The experimental plots (dotted lines) are compared to numerical simulations (solid lines); the dashed black box above provides a zoomed-in view from 0 to 50 s, emphasizing the match between the experimental results and simulations. (B) Two-dimensional (2D) spatial intensity profiles experimentally acquired at select times. (C) Temporal evolution of beam width during self-trapping experiments at different optical powers. (D) Comparison of calculated and experimental values of minimum self-trapped beam width as a function of beam power.
Fig. 3.Rapidly reversible self-trapping in the SP-modified p(AAm-co-AAc). (A) Temporal plots of peak intensity (blue) and effective diameter (red) over 45 cycles of self-trapping of a laser beam. Cycles of 30 s were separated by dark periods ranging from 300 to 40 s (indicated above the plots). (B) Scheme and spatial intensity profiles showing the “off” (divergent) and “on” (self-trapped) states of the laser beam over select cycles. White circles trace the diameter (1/e2) of the initially divergent beam in the off state.
Fig. 4.Self-trapping in control systems; experimental measurements. Temporal plots of peak intensity (blue) and width (red) of a laser beam acquired at the exit face of (A) an unmodified p(AAm-co-AAc) hydrogel, (B) solution of SP in DMSO:water, (C) p(AAm-co-AAc) hydrogel dispersed with untethered SP, and (D) SP-modified poly (hydroxyethyl)methacrylate p(AAm-co-HEMA) hydrogel. Laser power of 9 mW (5.65 kW cm−2) was employed in A and 6.0 mW (3.77 kW cm−2) in B–D.
Fig. 5.Dynamic interactions of two parallel self-trapped beams. (A) Temporal plots of relative peak intensities (Left) and corresponding 2D spatial intensity profiles (Right) acquired at select times at the sample exit face for two beams separated by Δx = ∼200 µm. When propagating together, beam 1 (blue) and beam 2 (red) self-trapped over 625 s to a relative peak intensity of 12 and 9, respectively (from an initial value of 1), and comparable widths of ∼40 µm (labeled as region A on the plot and intensity profile; details in ). When beam 2 was selectively blocked, beam 1 rapidly returned to high self-trapping efficiency, increasing in relative intensity to ∼20 with a minimum width of ∼28 µm over 250 s (labeled as region B). When beam 2 was reintroduced, however, beam 1 diminished in self-trapping efficiency, decreasing in relative peak intensity to 5.3 and broadening again to ∼40 µm over 800 s; beam 2 also showed reduced efficiency, attaining a maximum relative peak intensity of only 7 and a width of ∼40 µm (region C). The equivalent effect was observed when beam 1 was blocked in the next cycle of the same experiment (region D). (B) Temporal plots of relative peak intensities and corresponding 2D spatial intensity profiles for two beams separated by Δx = 25 µm. (C) Simulations snapshots of the interactions of two self-trapped beams with Δx = 25 µm. Color shows the intensity in Wm−2. See also and Movies S2 and S3.