| Literature DB >> 32029360 |
Dean Mobbs1, Drew B Headley2, Weilun Ding3, Peter Dayan4.
Abstract
Naturalistic observations show that decisions to avoid or escape predators occur at different spatiotemporal scales and that they are supported by different computations and neural circuits. At their extremes, proximal threats are addressed by a limited repertoire of reflexive and myopic actions, reflecting reduced decision and state spaces and model-free (MF) architectures. Conversely, distal threats allow increased information processing supported by model-based (MB) operations, including affective prospection, replay, and planning. However, MF and MB computations are often intertwined, and under conditions of safety the foundations for future effective reactive execution can be laid through MB instruction of MF control. Together, these computations are associated with distinct population codes embedded within a distributed defensive circuitry whose goal is to determine and realize the best policy.Keywords: Dyna; anxiety; fear; hippocampus; model based; model free; periaqueductal gray; prefrontal cortex; threat imminence continuum
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32029360 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229