| Literature DB >> 32029217 |
Rafael Romero-Garcia1, Jakob Seidlitz2, Kirstie J Whitaker3, Sarah E Morgan2, Peter Fonagy4, Raymond J Dolan5, Peter B Jones6, Ian M Goodyer6, John Suckling2, Petra E Vértes7, Edward T Bullmore6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic risk is thought to drive clinical variation on a spectrum of schizophrenia-like traits, but the underlying changes in brain structure that mechanistically link genomic variation to schizotypal experience and behavior are unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescence; Allen Human Brain Atlas; Development; Fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons; Multiparameter MRI mapping; Myelination; Schizophrenia
Year: 2019 PMID: 32029217 PMCID: PMC7369635 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Psychiatry ISSN: 0006-3223 Impact factor: 13.382
Previous Studies Relating Schizotypal Traits and Macrostructural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metrics
| Study | Sample Size, | Mean Age, Years | Experimental Design | Brain Coverage | Schizotypy Measure | Type I Error Control | Structural Index | Directionality | Brain Regions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evans | 28 | 11 | VBM | Whole brain | PSI-C | Bonferroni | Volume | − | Caudate, amygdala, hippocampal gyrus, middle temporal |
| Nenadic | 59 | 31 | VBM / positive and negative factor of schizotypy | Whole brain | CAPE | FWE | Volume | − | R precuneus |
| Wang | 69 | 19 | VBM / dividing subjects with high/low schizotypy | Whole brain | SPQ | AlphaSim permutation | Volume | − | Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, insula, posterior temporal, cerebellum |
| DeRosse | 138 | 36 | ANCOVA / dividing subjects with high/low schizotypy | ROIs | SPQ | None | Thickness/GM and WM volume | − | Frontal, temporal |
| Kühn | 34 | 36 | Vertexwise / positive and negative factor of schizotypy | Whole cortex/thalamus | SPQ | FDR | Thickness/thalamus volume | + | R dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, R dorsal premotor |
| Ettinger | 55 | 27 | VBM | Whole brain | RISC | FWE cluster | Volume | − | Medial prefrontal, orbitofrontal, temporal |
| Modinos | 38 | 20 | VBM / dividing subjects with high/low schizotypy | Whole brain | CAPE | FDR | Volume | + | Medial posterior cingulate, precuneus |
| Moorhead | 98 | 16 | VBM / longitudinal study | Whole brain | SIS | Unspecified multiple comparison correction | Volume | − | L medial temporal, L amygdala, L parahippocampal gyrus |
| Stanfield | 143 | 16 | ANCOVA | Whole brain | SIS | None | Folding | + | R prefrontal |
Directionality refers to whether the study reports a positive (+) or negative (−) association between a schizotypy measure and a structural metric.
ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CAPE, Community Assessment of Psychic Experience; FDR, false discovery rate; FWE, familywise error; GM, gray matter; L, left; PSI-C: Psychiatric and Schizotypal Inventory for Children; R, right; RISC, Rust Inventory of Schizotypal Cognitions; ROI, region of interest; SIS, Structured Interview for Schizotypy; SPQ, Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; WM, white matter.
Figure 1Schizotypy-related magnetization (SRM): association between intracortical magnetization transfer (MT) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) score. (A) Cortical surface maps highlighting areas where SPQ total score was significantly positively correlated with regional MT after controlling for age by regression: pink regions had nominally significant SRM (2-tailed p < .05); red regions had significant SRM controlled for multiple comparisons over 68 cortical regions tested (false discovery rate < .05). (B) Scatterplot of SPQ total score for each participant vs. mean MT in regions of significant SRM (R2246 = .04, p = .002); each dot represents 1 of 248 healthy people 14 to 25 years of age. (C) Scatterplots of SRM vs. MT at 14 years of age (MT14) (left) (R267 = .34, permutation testing based on spherical rotations: p = .002) and SRM vs. change in magnetization 14 to 25 years of age (ΔMT) (right) (R267 = .28, permutation testing based on spherical rotations: p = .006). Each point represents a cortical region and colored points represent regions with significant SRM (pink: p < .05; red: false discovery rate < .05). (D) Word cloud representing ontological terms most frequently associated with functional activation of the medial posterior cortical areas of significant SRM. (E) Cortical surface maps highlighting areas where scores on the disorganized factor of schizotypy was significantly positively correlated with regional MT after controlling for age by regression (pink, 2-tailed p < .05; red, false discovery rate < .05).
Figure 2Gene expression and schizotypy-related magnetization (SRM). (A) (Left panel) The first partial least squares component (PLS1) defined a linear combination of genes that had a similar cortical pattern of expression to the cortical map of SRM, representing the correlation between Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and magnetization transfer at each of 68 cortical regions. (Center panel) Scatterplot of PLS1 scores versus SRM; each point is a cortical region. (Right panel) The combination of genes defined by PLS1 explains more of the variance in SRM (dotted line) than expected by chance (histogram of permutation distribution). (B) Illustrative example of the weights assigned to representative genes on PLS1. Genes with the highest positive weights are colored in pink, nonsignificantly weighted genes are shown in white, and the genes with the lowest negative weights are colored in blue. Tables summarize p values by permutation testing for enrichment analysis by 4 lists of genes affiliated to specific cell types and 4 lists of genes associated with schizophrenia: Gandal and Fromer up-reg (5, 47) are lists of genes transcriptionally upregulated postmortem in schizophrenia; Gandal and Fromer down-reg are lists of genes transcriptionally downregulated in schizophrenia. Scatterplots and cortical maps illustrate that positively weighted genes, like ANK1, are overexpressed in cortical regions with high levels of schizotypy-related myelination, whereas negatively weighted genes, like PTPRC, are underexpressed in regions with high levels of SRM. FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 3Weights of gene expression from partial least squares (PLS) analysis of schizotypy-related magnetization (SRM) were related to histological measures of differential gene expression from case-control studies of schizophrenia and other disorders. (A) The weight of each gene on the first PLS component was significantly negatively correlated with differential gene expression postmortem in schizophrenia according to prior data reported by Gandal et al. (5) (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ11111 = −.16, Bonferroni-corrected adjusted p11111 < 10−65) and by Fromer et al. (47) [Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ586 = −.30, adjusted p586 < 10−12; for this dataset, only significantly different expression values have been reported (46)]. (B) Correlations between PLS weights and differential expression were also evaluated for other conditions (5): inflammatory bowel disease (ρ586 = −.02, adjusted p586 = .10), major depressive disorder (ρ15281 = .007, adjusted p15281 = .37), bipolar disorder (ρ16064 = −.09, adjusted p16064 < 10−19 ), and autism spectrum disorder (ρ11131 = .11, adjusted p11131 < 10−35). Red and blue points represent genes that are significantly up- and downregulated in postmortem data.
Figure 4Protein-protein interaction network for a set of 213 proteins coded by genes associated with both schizotypy-related magnetization and postmortem brain transcriptional dysregulation in schizophrenia. Nodes represent genes that were both 1) downregulated in brain tissue from 159 patients with schizophrenia and 2) positively weighted on the partial least squares component most strongly associated with schizotypy-related myelination in 248 healthy adolescents. Edges represent known protein-protein interactions. The color and size of each node represents its degree centrality or “hubness,” simply the number of interactions that protein has with the other proteins in the network. The top 4 most highly connected hubs are highlighted: PPP3CC is a calmodulin dependent phosphatase, calcineurin; CAMK2G is a calcium/calmodulin dependent kinase; PVALB is a calcium binding protein, parvalbumin; ACTN4 is a microfilamentous protein, actinin-alpha-4. This network is specialized for calcium-dependent processes that have been previously associated with interneurons and with pathogenesis of schizophrenia. For the complete list of gene names on the protein-protein interaction network, see Figure S11 and see https://version-10-5.string-db.org/cgi/network.pl?taskId=RMpA04wbWG8k for a full interactive version of the protein-protein interaction network.