| Literature DB >> 32029006 |
Shengkui Cao1,2,3,4,5, Wenci Gong1,2,3,4,5, Xiaofan Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Meng Xu1,2,3,4,5, Ying Wang1,2,3,4,5, Yuxin Xu1,2,3,4,5, Jianping Cao1,2,3,4,5, Yujuan Shen6,7,8,9,10, Jiaxu Chen11,12,13,14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystic echinococcosis is a chronic disease caused by infection with the larvae of Echinococcus granulosus. The parasite's ability to establish persistent infection is partly due to its evolving immune evasion strategies. One strategy may involve the protective effect of arginase, which impedes the control of pathogens or tumors, whereas it remains largely unknown during E. granulosus infection. Here, we analyzed whether arginase was produced in peritoneal cells and assessed its role in immunosuppression in mice infected with protoscoleces of E. granulosus.Entities:
Keywords: Arginase; Echinococcus granulosus; INOS; Immunosuppression; Peritoneum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32029006 PMCID: PMC7006169 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-3919-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Presence and activity of arginase in peritoneal cells (9 months post-infection). a Immunoblot of ARG-1, ARG-2 and iNOS from the lysates of macrophages and non-macrophage cells from infected and control mice (macrophages were magnetically separated from peritoneal cells and the remaining cells were labeled non-macrophage cells). The IL4 and IL13 stimulated peritoneal cells, HepG2 cells and LPS stimulated peritoneal cells served as positive controls. Graphical representations of band intensities are shown in the right panel. Protein expression was normalized to β-actin. Differences were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA. b Immunofluorescent assay of ARG-1 in whole peritoneal cells. DAPI was used to visualize nuclei. Scale-bars: 100 µm. c The levels of ARG-1, ARG-2 and iNOS mRNA expression in peritoneal cells were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Relative mRNA expression was normalized to GAPDH. The difference was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. d 2 × 106 cell lysates in 200 µl arginase assay buffer were used to determine arginase activity. The unit of arginase activity is denoted as U/ml (one unit means the amount of enzyme that will generate 1.0 µmol of H2O2 per min at 37 °C). The difference was analyzed by a Student’s t-test. The data are the result of a representative experiment out of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Abbreviations: ns, not significant
Fig. 2ARG-1 is produced in multiple peritoneal myeloid cells at different time points post-infection. a Representative flow cytometry analysis of ARG-1 expression in SSChighCD11b+F4/80+, SSClowCD11b+F4/80+ and CD11b+CD11c+ cells from one infected mouse at 6 months post-infection. b The percentages of SSChighCD11b+F4/80+ cells in total peritoneal leukocytes, SSClowCD11b+F4/80+ and CD11b+CD11c+ cells in SSC-low leukocytes, together with the percentages of ARG-1 expression in corresponding cells were determined by flow cytometry at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-infection. The differences were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. c Representative flow cytometry analysis of ARG-1 expression in CD11b+Gr-1+Ly-6C+Ly-6G−, CD11b+Gr-1+Ly-6C−Ly-6G+, CD11b+Gr-1+ and CD11b+Ly-6G+ cells from one infected mouse at 12 months post-infection. d The percentages of CD11b+Gr-1+Ly-6C+Ly-6G−n, CD11b+Gr-1+Ly-6C−Ly-6G+, CD11b+Gr-1+ and CD11b+Ly-6G+ cells in SSC-low leukocytes, and the percentages of ARG-1 expression in the corresponding cells were determined by flow cytometry at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-infection. The differences were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. The percentages of ARG-1 expression (red) were confirmed on the basis of isotypic controls (black) in a and c. The data are the result of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3Dynamic studies of CD3ζ expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vivo. a Representative flow cytometry analysis of CD3ζ expression in CD4+ (CD3ε+CD4+) and CD8+ (CD3ε+CD8+) T cells among spleen leukocytes from one infected mouse at 6 months post-infection. b The relative MFI of CD3ζ expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was quantified by flow cytometry at different time points post-infection (3, 6, 9 and 12 months). The differences were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. The data are the result of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Abbreviations: ns, not significant
Fig. 4Arginase produced by peritoneal cells from infected mice prevents the re-expression of the CD3ζ chain. Isolated murine pan T cells were stimulated with 3 μg/ml anti-CD3ε plus 500 ng/ml anti-CD28 antibodies in l-arginine-free RPMI 1640 for 24 h, and peritoneal cells from infected/control mice were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 300 μM l-arginine separately for 24 h. Stimulated T cells were then added to the upper chamber of a co-culture transwell system containing the peritoneal cells in the bottom chamber for an additional 48 h of culture. In some experiments, the l-arginine (2 mM), BEC (90 μM), l-NMMA (500 μM) and catalase (200 U/ml) were respectively added into the cultures at 0 h. a CD3ζ re-expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was tested by flow cytometry. The differences were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA. b Representative histograms of CD3ζ re-expression in activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells co-cultured with peritoneal cells for 48 h. The data are the result of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Abbreviations: ns, not significant
Fig. 5Concentrations of arginine-related metabolites in serum from mice (9 months post-infection). The concentration of arginine (a), urea (b), citrulline (c) and ornithine (d) was quantified by an ion-exchange AA analyzer. e The concentration ratio between urea and arginine (Arg). f The ratio between citrulline (Cit) and arginine. g The ratio between ornithine (Orn) and arginine. h The ratio of arginine/(citrulline + ornithine). i The total concentration of nitrite, used as a quantitative measure of NO production. The differences were analyzed by a Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001