| Literature DB >> 32028603 |
Jacinto Benhadi-Marín1, María Villa1, Luís F Pereira1, Isabel Rodrigues1, Marina Morente2, Paula Baptista1, José Alberto Pereira1.
Abstract
The olive grove is a key landscape across the Mediterranean basin. This agroecosystem is threatened by Xylella fastidiosa, the causal agent of the olive tree quick decline syndrome, Philaenus spumarius being the main vector. A way to limit pest populations relies on the use of biological control agents such as arthropods. Among them, spiders are generalist predators with different hunting strategies that feed mostly on insects and can contribute to limit pests. In this work, field and laboratory data were used to provide a protocol aiming to facilitate the selection of species of spiders among different guilds that could represent potential natural enemies of P. spumarius. Sampling of spiders was conducted in olive groves in northeastern Portugal. Two species, namely the orb-weaver Araniella cucurbitina and the ambusher Synema globosum, were selected according to the dominant guilds of spiders inhabiting the olive crop. We tested the differences of potential predatory efficiency using classical functional response tests with P. spumarius as prey. A type-II functional response was found for A. cucurbitina, whereas a type-I response was found for S. globosum. This difference uncovers a different potential efficiency among the two species as natural enemies of P. spumarius with relevant implications at high prey density in the field. A conceptual workflow to follow the fieldwork and selection of species for further work (i.e., laboratory assays) is provided and discussed. Standardized methods regarding the assessment of the suitability and efficiency of potential natural enemies are essential for the integration of results at different geographical extents and crops. Selecting functional counterparts such as different species of predators occurring at different locations that use the same prey (e.g., a pest) in the same way (e.g., hunting strategy) would facilitate developing biological control schemes.Entities:
Keywords: biological control; functional response; hunting strategy; predators; quick decline syndrome; spittlebug
Year: 2020 PMID: 32028603 PMCID: PMC7074277 DOI: 10.3390/insects11020100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Functional response models obtained for Araniella cucurbitina (orb weaver) (AC) and Synema globosum (ambusher) (SG) fed on adults of Philaenus spumarius during 24 h no-choice experiments. Thick lines represent the fitted values of data and the bands that surround them represent the limits of the 95% confidence interval of the curves.
Figure 2Abundance of guilds of spiders found in the studied olive groves at three sampling periods: (a) appearance of foams (P1), (b) development of nymphs (P2), and (c) emergence of adults of Philaenus spumarius (P3). Different letters above bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). A: Ambushers; St: Stalkers; W: Wandering sheet/tangle weavers; OW: Orb-weavers; GR: Ground runners; SpWB: Space web builders; FR: Foliage runners; ShWB: Sheet web builders; S: Specialists. Note that scales differ on y axes.
Guilds, families, and species of Araneae identified in the complete pool of samples collected at the studied olive groves. Guild assignment follows Uetz et al. [23] and Cardoso et al. [31].
| Guild | Family | Species | Abundance (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambushers | Philodromidae | 1 | |
| 28 | |||
| Pisauridae | 6 | ||
| Thomisidae | 73 | ||
| 26 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 12 | |||
| Immatures | 339 | ||
| Foliage runners | Cheiracanthiidae | 5 | |
| 8 | |||
| Sparassidae | 1 | ||
| Ground runners | Dysderidae | 2 | |
| Gnaphosidae | 4 | ||
| 1 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| Immatures | 13 | ||
| Lycosidae | 1 | ||
| 2 | |||
| 13 | |||
| Immatures | 22 | ||
| Orb-weavers | Araneidae | 86 | |
| 6 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 201 | |||
| Uloboridae | 10 | ||
| Sheet web builders | Agelenidae | 3 | |
| Space web builders | Dictynidae | Immatures | 1 |
| Theridiidae | 3 | ||
| 1 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 1 | |||
| Theridiidae sp. 1 | 2 | ||
| Theridiidae sp. 2 | 1 | ||
| Immatures | 2 | ||
| Specialists | Zodariidae | 1 | |
| 3 | |||
| Stalkers | Oxyopidae | 105 | |
| 86 | |||
| 276 | |||
| Salticidae | 2 | ||
| 2 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 5 | |||
| Immatures | 17 | ||
| Wandering sheet/tangle weavers | Linyphiidae | 7 | |
| Erigoninae sp. | 62 | ||
| Linyphiidae sp. 1 | 1 | ||
| 31 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 2 | |||
| Immatures | 37 | ||
| Araneae immatures (not identified) | 13 | ||
| Total | 1578 |
Figure 3(a–c) Species accumulation curves and (d–f) guild accumulation curves at three sampling periods: appearance of foams, development of nymphs, and emergence of adults of Philaenus spumarius, respectively, in the studied olive groves. S: Number of species (upper panels) and guilds of spiders (lower panels).
Figure 4Workflow depicting the proposed protocol to select potential natural enemies of Philaenus spumarius among spiders in the olive grove.