| Literature DB >> 32028347 |
Garrett I Ash1,2, Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen3,4, Michael A Busa5, Robert Gregory6, Carol Ewing Garber4, Jason Liu7, Mark Gerstein7, José Antonio Casajus8,9, Alex Gonzalez-Aguero8,9, Demitri Constantinou9,10, Michael Geistlinger9,11, Fergus M Guppy12, Fabio Pigozzi9,13, Yannis P Pitsiladis9,13,14.
Abstract
The recent explosion of wearable technology and the associated concerns prompted the International Federation of Sports Medicine (FIMS) to create a quality assurance standard for wearable devices, which provides commissioned testing of marketing claims and endorsement of commercial wearables that test favorably. An open forum as announced in the conference advertising was held at the Annual Meeting of the New England Regional Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine (NEACSM) November 7 to 8, 2019, in Providence, Rhode Island, USA for attending NEACSM members to voice their input on the process. Herein, we report the proceedings. The round table participants perceived the quality assurance standard to be important, but identified some practical process challenges that included the broad scope and complexity of the device universe, the need for a multiphase testing pathway, and the associated fees for product evaluation. The participants also supported the evaluation of device data analysis, behavioral influences, and user experience in the overall evaluation. Looking forward, the FIMS quality assurance standard faces the challenge of balancing these broader perspectives with practical constraints of budget, facilities, time, and human resources.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32028347 DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Sports Med Rep ISSN: 1537-890X Impact factor: 1.733