Literature DB >> 32027920

Neural responses of in-group "favoritism" and out-group "discrimination" toward moral behaviors.

Dongmei Mei1, Wenjian Zhang1, Lijun Yin2.   

Abstract

People hate being deceived. However, what would it be if lies come from in-group members compared with that from out-group members? In the current Electroencephalography (EEG) study, we recruited thirty-six participants to play a modified estimator and advisor game to investigate the mental and neural processes to lies and truth conveyed by in-group and out-group members. At the behavioral level, lies are less morally acceptable, arose less positive emotion, and made participants distribute less money to the advisor in a dictator game. Meanwhile, participants liked the in-group university more than the out-group university and they thought they were more similar to in-group members than to out-group members. However, there were no significant interactions of group type (i.e., in-group and out-group) and message type (i.e., lies and truth) in the aforementioned behavioral assessments. At the neural level, significant interaction effects were found in the parietal N1 and P3 amplitude. More importantly, no significant N1 and P3 amplitude differences between in-group lies and truth were found, while outgroup lies elicited larger P3 amplitude than outgroup truth and out-group truth elicited larger N1 amplitude than outgroup lies. What's more, P3 amplitude differences between lies vs. truth positively correlated with fairness scores only in the in-group condition but not in the out-group condition. Current study showed that the P3 component was sensitive in capturing subtle differences when participants were processing different types of lies and truth that could not be captured by behavioral measurements. Besides, the fairness trait modulated the in-group bias related P3 patterns. The current study provides insight into the neurobiological mechanism underlying the mental process of in-group and out-group lies and truth, and suggests individuals' tendency of general in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination toward moral behaviors.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; In-group bias; Lies; N1; P3

Year:  2020        PMID: 32027920     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  2 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.

Authors:  Ali M Miraghaie; Hamidreza Pouretemad; Alessandro E P Villa; Mohammad A Mazaheri; Reza Khosrowabadi; Alessandra Lintas
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Charity Misconduct on Public Health Issues Impairs Willingness to Offer Help.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Ruzhen Mao; Zijun Ke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.