Literature DB >> 32027912

Geographic and sociodemographic differences in cervical cancer screening modalities.

Ann Goding Sauer1, Priti Bandi2, Debbie Saslow3, Farhad Islami2, Ahmedin Jemal2, Stacey A Fedewa2.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening recommendations for women aged 30-65 years include co-testing (high-risk human papillomavirus [hrHPV] with Pap testing) every five years or Pap testing alone every three years. Geographic variations of these different screening modalities across the United States have not been examined. We selected 82,426 non-pregnant women aged 30-65 years from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System with data on sociodemographics, hysterectomy, and cervical cancer screening, representing 42 states and the District of Columbia. Logistic regression models with predicted marginal probabilities were used to calculate state-level prevalence estimates of recent cervical cancer screening and uptake of co-testing, Pap testing, and hrHPV testing among those who were recently screened. Analysis was conducted in 2018-2019. Recent screening prevalence ranged from 80.0% (Idaho) to 92.2% (Massachusetts), with more state-level geographic variability in co-testing than Pap testing alone. Uptake of co-testing ranged from 27.5% (Utah) to 49.9% (District of Columbia); compared to the national estimate, co-testing was lower in 12 states and higher in six states. Overall, Midwestern and Southern states had the lowest uptake of co-testing whereas Northeastern states had the highest. Sociodemographic, healthcare, and behavioral factors accounted for some but not all state-level variation in co-testing. There was substantial state-level variability in co-testing prevalence, which was lowest in Midwestern and Southern states; the variation was not entirely explained by individual sociodemographic, healthcare, and behavioral factors. Future studies should monitor the impact of geographic variations in screening modalities on state-level differences in cervical cancer incidence, survival, and mortality.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Early detection of cancer; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Vaginal smears

Year:  2020        PMID: 32027912     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  4 in total

1.  Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Shahram Shahangian; Mona Saraiya; Hunter Holt; Maribeth Gagnon; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation from a Statewide Registry.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Lu Chen; Jane J Kim; Steven Jenison; Giovanna Rossi; Huining Kang; Jack Cuzick; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Acculturation Strategies and Pap Screening Uptake among Sub-Saharan African Immigrants (SAIs).

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Jia-Rong Wu; Gia Mudd-Martin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Test among Females with Diabetes in the Deep South.

Authors:  Cassidi C McDaniel; Hayleigh H Hallam; Tiffany Cadwallader; Hee-Yun Lee; Chiahung Chou
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.