Nandita Kachru1, Holly M Holmes2, Michael L Johnson1, Hua Chen1, Rajender R Aparasu3. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy , University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy , University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. rraparasu@uh.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selective antimuscarinics may offer a favorable safety profile over non-selective antimuscarinics for the management of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients with dementia. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that non-selective antimuscarinics are associated with increased risk of mortality compared to selective antimuscarinics in older adults with dementia and OAB. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched retrospective new-user cohort design among Medicare beneficiaries in community settings. PATIENTS: Older adults with dementia and OAB with incident antimuscarinic use. MAIN MEASURES: The primary exposure was antimuscarinic medications classified as non-selective (oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine) and selective (solifenacin, darifenacin) agents. All-cause mortality within 180 days of incident antimuscarinic use formed the outcome measure. New users of non-selective and selective antimuscarinics were matched on propensity scores using the Greedy 5 → 1 matching technique. Cox proportional-hazards model stratified on matched pairs was used to evaluate the risk of mortality associated with the use of non-selective versus selective antimuscarinics in the sample. KEY RESULTS: The study identified 16,955 (77.6%) non-selective antimuscarinic users and 4893 (22.4%) selective antimuscarinic users. Propensity score matching yielded 4862 patients in each group. The unadjusted mortality rate at 180 days was 2.6% (126) for non-selective and 1.6% (78) for selective antimuscarinic users in the matched cohort (p value < 0.01). The Cox model stratified on matched pairs found 50% higher risk of 180-day mortality with non-selective antimuscarinics as compared to selective ones (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.16). The study findings remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of non-selective antimuscarinics was associated with a 50% increase in mortality risk among older adults with dementia and OAB. Given the safety concerns regarding non-selective antimuscarinic agents, there is a significant need to optimize their use in the management of OAB for older patients with dementia.
BACKGROUND: Selective antimuscarinics may offer a favorable safety profile over non-selective antimuscarinics for the management of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients with dementia. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that non-selective antimuscarinics are associated with increased risk of mortality compared to selective antimuscarinics in older adults with dementia and OAB. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched retrospective new-user cohort design among Medicare beneficiaries in community settings. PATIENTS: Older adults with dementia and OAB with incident antimuscarinic use. MAIN MEASURES: The primary exposure was antimuscarinic medications classified as non-selective (oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine) and selective (solifenacin, darifenacin) agents. All-cause mortality within 180 days of incident antimuscarinic use formed the outcome measure. New users of non-selective and selective antimuscarinics were matched on propensity scores using the Greedy 5 → 1 matching technique. Cox proportional-hazards model stratified on matched pairs was used to evaluate the risk of mortality associated with the use of non-selective versus selective antimuscarinics in the sample. KEY RESULTS: The study identified 16,955 (77.6%) non-selective antimuscarinic users and 4893 (22.4%) selective antimuscarinic users. Propensity score matching yielded 4862 patients in each group. The unadjusted mortality rate at 180 days was 2.6% (126) for non-selective and 1.6% (78) for selective antimuscarinic users in the matched cohort (p value < 0.01). The Cox model stratified on matched pairs found 50% higher risk of 180-day mortality with non-selective antimuscarinics as compared to selective ones (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.16). The study findings remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of non-selective antimuscarinics was associated with a 50% increase in mortality risk among older adults with dementia and OAB. Given the safety concerns regarding non-selective antimuscarinic agents, there is a significant need to optimize their use in the management of OAB for older patients with dementia.
Authors: Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson; Jerry J Buccafusco; Christopher Chapple; William Chet de Groat; Alison D Fryer; Gary Kay; Alan Laties; Neil M Nathanson; Pankaj Jay Pasricha; Alan J Wein Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Satabdi Chatterjee; Vishal Bali; Ryan M Carnahan; Hua Chen; Michael L Johnson; Rajender R Aparasu Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Bulent Cetinel; Bulent Onal; Mehmet Hamza Gultekin; Muhammed Guzelsoy; Fethi Ahmet Turegun; Murat Dincer Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Alejandro Arana; Andrea V Margulis; Lisa J McQuay; Ryan Ziemiecki; Jennifer L Bartsch; Kenneth J Rothman; Billy Franks; Milbhor D'Silva; Kwame Appenteng; Cristina Varas-Lorenzo; Susana Perez-Gutthann Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Nandita Kachru; Holly M Holmes; Michael L Johnson; Hua Chen; Rajender R Aparasu Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.705
Authors: Nandita Kachru; Holly M Holmes; Michael L Johnson; Hua Chen; Rajender R Aparasu Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: L P Dantas; A R C C Forte; B C Lima; C N S Sousa; E C Vasconcelos; P H C Lessa; R F Vieira; M C A Patrocínio; S M M Vasconcelos Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 2.590