Literature DB >> 32025972

Correction to: The biomechanics and applications of strongman exercises: a systematic review.

Benjamin R Hindle1, Anna Lorimer2,3, Paul Winwood4,3, Justin W L Keogh2,3,5,6.   

Abstract

The original article [1] contained an error whereby the symbol '☼' originally included in and below Tables 2-5 did not display properly.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32025972      PMCID: PMC7002688          DOI: 10.1186/s40798-020-0239-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med Open        ISSN: 2198-9761


Correction to: Sports Med Open https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0222-z The original article [1] contained an error whereby the symbol ‘☼’ originally included in and below Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 did not display properly. This has been rectified in the following versions of these tables.
Table 2

Walking/carrying results comparisons - farmers walk

Winwood et al. [7]Keogh et al. [34]
Farmers walkUnloaded walkEffect sizeHigher performerLower performerEffect sizeGroup ave.
Spatiotemporal
 Ground contact time (s)0.46 ± 0.06* (MVP)0.67 ± 0.06 (MVP)−3.500.29 ± 0.02† (MVP˟)0.34 ± 0.03 (SVP˟)−1.960.30 ± 0.03☼ (MVP)
0.53 ± 0.09*(AP)0.77 ± 0.07 (AP)−3.000.39 ± 0.04† (AP)0.32 ± 0.03 (AP)1.980.36 ± 0.04 (AP)
 Stride rate (Hz)1.42 ± 0.17* (MVP)0.88 ± 0.06 (MVP)4.202.01 ± 0.13† (MVP˟)1.83 ± 0.04 (SVP˟)1.881.97 ± 0.13☼ (MVP)
1.21 ± 0.12* (AP)0.82 ± 0.04 (AP)4.401.88 ± 0.10† (AP)1.64 ± 0.12 (AP)2.171.79 ± 0.14 (AP)
 Stride length (m)1.04 ± 0.12* (MVP)1.43 ± 0.11 (MVP)−3.401.83 ± 0.04† (MVP˟)1.40 ± 0.17 (SVP˟)3.481.67 ± 0.10☼ (MVP)
0.85 ± 0.19* (AP)1.33 ± 0.11 (AP)−3.101.38 ± 0.16 (AP)1.33 ± 0.09 (AP)0.391.32 ± 0.12 (AP)
 Average velocity (m/s)1.48 ± 0.19 (MVP)1.26 ± 0.15 (MVP)1.283.66 ± 0.17† (MVP)2.83 ± 0.36 (MVP)2.953.29 ± 0.38☼ (MVP)
1.05 ± 0.21 (AP)1.11 ± 0.09 (AP)−0.372.61 ± 0.38 (AP)2.19 ± 0.27 (AP)1.272.41 ± 0.32 (AP)
Kinematic
 Ankle angle at FS (°)95.0 ± 3.00* (MVP)105 ± 2.00 (MVP)−3.80101 ± 6.00† (SVP˟)113 ± 5.00 (MVP˟)−2.17110 ± 9.00 (MVP)
96.00 ± 6.00* (AP)105 ± 2.00 (AP)− 2.3099.0 ± 8.00 (AP)106 ± 6.00 (AP)−0.99100 ± 8.00 (AP)
 Ankle angle at TO (°)100 ± 5.00* (MVP)115 ± 9.00 (MVP)−2.10118 ± 5.00 (MVP˟)117 ± 7.00 (SVP˟)0.16114 ± 6.00(MVP)
105 ± 6.00 (AP)118 ± 5.00 (AP)−2.30108 ± 4.00† (AP)114 ± 3.00 (AP)− 1.70111 ± 5.00 (AP)
 Ankle ROM (°)4.00 ± 4.00 (MVP)10.0 ± 10.0 (MVP)−0.70−10.0 ± 4.00† (SVP)1.00 ± 5.00 (MVP)−2.43−4.00 ± 7.00☼ (MVP)
 Knee angle at FS (°)154 ± 7.00* (MVP)178 ± 6.00 (MVP)−3.70156 ± 6.00 (MVP˟)166 ± 16.0 (SVP˟)−0.83155 ± 6.00☼ (MVP)
150 ± 9.00* (AP)174 ± 10.0 (AP)−2.50147 ± 7.00 (AP)151 ± 5.00 (AP)−0.66150 ± 6.00 (AP)
 Thigh angle at FS (°)34.0 ± 6.00* (MVP)23.0 ± 7.00 (MVP)1.8038.0 ± 3.00† (MVP˟)31.0 ± 4.00 (SVP˟)1.9834.0 ± 3.00 (MVP)
 Thigh ROM (°)−19.0 ± 5.00 (MVP)−22.0 ± 10.0 (MVP)0.40− 44.0 ± 4.00† (MVP˟)− 35.0 ± 6.00 (SVP˟)−1.77− 38.0 ± 4.00☼ (MVP)
 Trunk angle at FS (°)78.0 ± 3.00* (MVP)90.0 ± 2.00 (MVP)− 4.10
69.0 ± 5.00* (AP)85.0 ± 2.00 (AP)− 4.30
 Trunk angle at TO (°)76.0 ± 4.00* (MVP)87.0 ± 2.00 (MVP)− 3.20
70.0 ± 5.00* (AP)84.0 ± 4.00 (AP)− 3.40
Kinetic
 Mean anterior GRF (N)127 ± 31.0* (MVP)83.0 ± 25.0 (MVP)1.60
 Peak anterior GRF (N)447 ± 98.0* (MVP)259 ± 53.0 (MVP)2.40
 Mean medial GRF (N)120 ± 41.0* (MVP)70.0 ± 36.0 (MVP)1.30
 Peak medial GRF (N)241 ± 73.0* (MVP)120 ± 62.0 (MVP)1.80
 Mean posterior GRF (N)159 ± 45.0* (MVP)94.0 ± 34.0 (MVP)1.60
 Peak posterior GRF (N)389 ± 143* (MVP)211 ± 77.0 (MVP)1.50
 Mean vertical GRF (N)2540 ± 376* (MVP)1030 ± 247 (MVP)4.70
 Peak vertical GRF (N)3630 ± 608* (MVP)1510 ± 387 (MVP)4.10
 Peak lateral GRF (N)210 ± 73.0* (MVP)119 ± 45.0 (MVP)1.50

All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. Effect sizes reported for between exercise [7] and between performance standard [34], A positive effect size indicates the left-hand column (farmers walk or higher performer) had a greater value than the respective right-hand column (unloaded walk or lower performer).* significant difference to unloaded walking, † significant difference to low performing athletes, ☼ significant difference to acceleration phase, ˟ comparison between phase based on distance, AP acceleration phase, ave average, GRF ground reaction force, MVP maximum velocity phase, SVP submaximal velocity phase

Table 3

Significant differences in muscle activation and kinetic outcomes between the walking/carrying exercises

Farmers walk [35]LH suitcase carry [35]RH suitcase carry [35]Yoke walk [35]
Muscle activity (%MVC)
 Left upper erector spinae77.6 ± 29.3 ‡47.1 ± 6.2032.4 ± 4.60 *☼69.3 ± 17.5 ‡
 Right upper erector spinae91.4 ± 54.7 †24.9 ± 17.6 *‡☼52.1 ± 17.3 †65.6 ± 14.4†
 Left lower erector spinae106 ± 51.1 †31.6 ± 10.1 *‡☼77.4 ± 21.3 †79.2 ± 10.2 †
 Right lower erector spinae144 ± 36.7 ‡96.9 ± 20.4 ‡44.1 ± 9.10 *†☼107 ± 31.5 ‡
 Left latissimus dorsi169 ± 55.4 *‡97.4 ± 55.768.9 ± 23.2 ☼51.9 ± 26.4 ☼
 Right latissimus dorsi152 ± 26.7 *†65.3 ± 6.20 ☼91.4 ± 39.145.5 ± 31.7 ☼
 Left external oblique39.3 ± 30.6 †12.6 ± 5.30 *‡☼61.5 ± 21.9 †47.5 ± 31.7 †
 Right external oblique50.4 ± 17.4 ‡65.1 ± 24.4 ‡29.0 ± 17.8 *†☼58.8 ± 17.4 ‡
 Right rectus abdominis13.3 ± 3.8014.6 ± 4.505.60 ± 1.80 *22.3 ± 18.1 ‡
 Right gluteus maximus114 ± 70.3 ‡78.2 ± 39.550.5 ± 31.2 *☼113 ± 52.1 ‡
 Right gluteus medius108 ± 66.9 ‡64.1 ± 38.757.3 ± 23.6 *☼108 ± 69.7 ‡
 Right bicep femoris54.0 ± 13.7 †31.2 ± 7.50 *‡ ☼48.3 ± 8.6 †61.7 ± 6.30 †
 Right rectus femoris77.4 ± 35.641.1 ± 9.20 *56.5 ± 11.5 *107 ± 23.5 †‡
Kinetic
 Muscular anterior/posterior shear (N)2800 †1680 ☼11601890
 Muscular compressive load (N)7900 †5800 *☼67007800 †
 Muscular axial twist stiffness (Nm/rad)27,200 †‡19,100 ☼24,600 ☼25,900
 Muscular flexion/extension stiffness (Nm/rad)35,60024,000 *27,50038,600 †

All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. * significant difference to yoke walk, † significant difference to left hand suitcase carry, ‡ significant difference to right hand suitcase carry, ☼ significant difference to farmers walk, LH left hand, MVC maximum voluntary contraction RH right hand

Table 4

Pulling significant results comparisons - heavy sled pull

Winwood et al. [38]Keogh et al. [32]
Heavy sled pullEffect sizeBack squatHigher performerLower performerEffect sizeGroup ave.
Spatiotemporal
 Ground contact time (s)0.35 ± 0.04 (MVP)−0.850.33 ± 0.04† (MVP)0.76 ± 0.37 (MVP)−1.630.48 ± 0.23 (MVP)
0.38 ± 0.03 (AP)0.42 ± 0.19 (AP)0.57 ± 0.23 (AP)−0.710.53 ± 0.32 (AP)
 Stride rate (s)1.42 ± 0.14 (MVP)0.071.63 ± 0.12† (MVP)1.10 ± 0.42 (MVP)1.721.37 ± 0.39 (MVP)
1.41 ± 0.14 (AP)1.50 ± 0.55 (AP)1.29 ± 0.37 (AP)0.451.45 ± 0.50 (AP)
 Swing time (s)0.33 ± 0.04 (MVP)0.390.29 ± 0.03 (MVP)0.27 ± 0.05 (MVP)0.490.28 ± 0.04☼ (MVP)
0.31 ± 0.06 (AP)0.28 ± 0.07† (AP)0.23 ± 0.05 (AP)0.820.25 ± 0.06 (AP)
 Stride length (m)1.29 ± 0.17☼ (MVP)1.811.29 ± 0.26† (MVP)0.80 ± 0.16 (MVP)2.271.03 ± 0.26☼ (MVP)
1.00 ± 0.15 (AP)0.85 ± 0.25† (AP)0.65 ± 0.04 (AP)1.120.74 ± 0.28 (AP)
Kinematic
 Average velocity (m/s)1.83 ± 0.22☼ (MVP)2.442.08 ± 0.08† (MVP)0.99 ± 0.50 (MVP)3.041.61 ± 0.55☼ (MVP)
1.39 ± 0.13 (AP)1.22 ± 0.20† (AP)0.79 ± 0.32 (AP)1.611.04 ± 0.30 (AP)
 Knee angle at FS (°)114 ± 6.00☼ (MVP)1.38132 ± 9.00† (MVP)112 ± 22.0 (MVP)1.19124 ± 18.0☼ (MVP)
103 ± 9.00(AP)125 ± 12.0† (AP)110 ± 10.0(AP)1.36116 ± 13.0 (AP)
 Knee angle at TO (°)138 ± 14.0 (MVP)0.35153 ± 7.00 (MVP)148 ± 10.0(MVP)0.59149 ± 9.00☼ (MVP)
133 ± 14.0 (AP)148 ± 14.0† (AP)138 ± 17.0 (AP)0.65141 ± 15.0 (AP)
 Thigh angle at FS (°)23.0 ± 5.00† (MVP)19.0 ± 5.0 (MVP)0.8021.0 ± 5.00☼ (MVP)
14.0 ± 10.0 (AP)16.0 ± 8.00 (AP)−0.2215.0 ± 10.0 (AP)
 Trunk angle at FS (°)61.0 ± 13.0 (MVP)− 0.6741.0 ± 7.00† (MVP)8.00 ± 29.0 (MVP)1.5626.0 ± 24.0☼ (MVP)
77.0 ± 30.0 (AP)29.0 ± 17.0† (AP)2.00 ± 16.0 (AP)1.6414.0 ± 21.0 (AP)
 Trunk angle at TO (°)61.0 ± 11.0 (MVP)−0.4941.0 ± 9.00† (MVP)14.0 ± 25.0 (MVP)1.5928.0 ± 21.0☼ (MVP)
69.0 ± 20.0 (AP)31.0 ± 15.0† (AP)10.0 ± 14.0 (AP)1.4519.0 ± 19.0 (AP)
Kinetic
 Mean anterior GRF (N)555 ± 107* (SC to MKE)6.6343.0 ± 22.0 (SC to MKE)
 Peak anterior GRF (N)810 ± 174* (SC to MKE)5.13126 ± 73.0 (SC to MKE)
 Mean vertical GRF (N)1330 ± 364* (SC to MKE)−2.382580 ± 648 (SC to MKE)
 Peak vertical GRF (N)1740 ± 463* (SC to MKE)−1.853500 ± 1270 (SC to MKE)
 Mean resultant ant/post force (N)271 ± 89.0☼ (MVP)−1.95
526 ± 162 (AP)
 Mean resultant med/lat force (N)−5.00 ± 22.0☼ (MVP)−1.75
24.0 ± 8.00 (AP)

All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. Spatiotemporal and kinematic effect sizes reported for between phase [38] and between performance standard [32], Kinetic effect sizes reported for between exercise (heavy sled pull vs back squat). A positive effect size indicates the left-hand column (higher performer or heavy sled pull) or top row (maximum velocity phase) had a greater value than the respective right-hand column (lower performer or back squat) or bottom row (acceleration phase).* significant difference to back squat, † significant difference to low performing athletes, ☼ significant difference to acceleration phase, ant/post anterior/posterior, AP acceleration phase, ave average, FS foot strike, GRF ground reaction force, med/lat medial/lateral, MVP maximum velocity phase, SC to MKE start of concentric phase to maximum knee extension, TO toe off

Table 5

Static lift significant result comparisons

Winwood et al. [39]Renals et al. [37]McGill et al. [35]Keogh et al. [33], McGill et al. [35]
165 mm diam logBarbell clean & press250 mm diam log316 mm diam logBarbell push pressLog liftAtlas stoneTire flip
Temporal
 Duration (s)7.96 ± 3.77 (TD)6.20 ± 1.96 (TD)0.22 ± 0.02(PR)0.22 ± 0.02(PR)0.22 ± 0.03 (PR)0.38 ± 0.17 (SP)(HP) ☼
0.67 ± 0.06 (TD)0.64 ± 0.07 (TD)0.54 ± 0.47 (TD)1.49 ± 0.92 (SP)(LP)
Kinematic
 Dip depth (cm)17.4 ± 4.40 (PP)18.0 ± 6.60 (PP)14.0 ± 3.00* (PP)13.0 ± 2.00* (PP)17.0 ± 4.00 (PP)
 Vertical lift velocity (m/s)0.60 ± 0.10* (FP)0.75 ± 0.15 (FP)
1.06 ± 0.41* (SP)1.69 ± 0.15 (SP)
0.88 ± 0.07 (PP)0.97 ± 0.08 (PP)0.64 ± 0.07* (PP)0.62 ± 0.06* (PP)0.74 ± 0.07 (PP)
 Hip angle (°)52.0 ± 6.00* (LO)60.0 ± 6.00 (LO)
182 ± 5.00* (TR)158 ± 15.0 (TR)
 HIP ROM (°)126 ± 9.00* (EL)116 ± 10.0 (EL)
 Knee angle (°)99.0 ± 25.0* (SSP)140 ± 11.0 (SSP)
139 ± 11.0* (TR)125 ± 13.0 (TR)
 Trunk angle (°)106 ± 2.00* (TR)91.0 ± 6.00 (TR)
93.0 ± 5.00* (BD)87.0 ± 2.00 (BD)
 Trunk ROM (°)83.0 ± 8.00* (EL)67.0 ± 12.0 (EL)
Kinetic
 Braking mean force (N)680 ± 262 (PP)625 ± 252* (PP)775 ± 317 (PP)
 Braking impulse (N.s)116 ± 28.7* (PP)106 ± 27.8* (PP)131 ± 27.3 (PP)
 Braking mean power (W)− 943 ± 281* (PP)− 854 ± 276* (PP)− 1090 ± 283 (PP)
 Mean posterior force (N)−67.0 ± 14.0* (EL)− 91.0 ± 27.0 (EL)
 Propulsive mean force (N)3230 ± 357* (PP)3130 ± 363* (PP)3400 ± 492 (PP)
 Propulsive impulse (N.s)307 ± 56.8 (PP)346 ± 66.8 (PP)255 ± 38.8* (PP)241 ± 28.7* (PP)293 ± 40.0 (PP)
 Propulsive mean power (W)1920 ± 591* (PP)2960 ± 802 (PP)2040 ± 377* (PP)1900 ± 295* (PP)2470 ± 482 (PP)
 Musc ant/post shear (N)2800§2600§
 Musc comp load (N)7500§8800§
 Musc ax twist stiff (Nm/rad)25,300§31,400§
 Musc flex/ext. stiff (Nm/rad)32,400§38,600§
Muscle activation (%MVC)
 Right rectus abdominis27.3 ± 27.8‡77.6 ± 41.687.8 ± 63.9†
 Right external oblique61.5 ± 49.1‡97.6 ± 67.7107 ± 45.4†

All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. * significant difference to barbell, † significant difference to log lift, ‡ significant difference to tire flip, ☼ significant difference to lower performing athletes, § value only provided in graph form and as such are approximate values with no standard deviation, Ant/post anterior/posterior, ax axial, BD bottom of dip, comp compressive, diam diameter, EL entire lift, flex/ext flexion/extension, FP first pull, HP higher performing athlete, LO lift off, LP lower performing athlete, musc muscle, MVC maximum voluntary contraction, PP push press phase, PR propulsive duration, SP second pull, SSP start of second pull, stiff stiffness, TD total lift duration, TR top retrieve phase

Walking/carrying results comparisons - farmers walk All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. Effect sizes reported for between exercise [7] and between performance standard [34], A positive effect size indicates the left-hand column (farmers walk or higher performer) had a greater value than the respective right-hand column (unloaded walk or lower performer).* significant difference to unloaded walking, † significant difference to low performing athletes, ☼ significant difference to acceleration phase, ˟ comparison between phase based on distance, AP acceleration phase, ave average, GRF ground reaction force, MVP maximum velocity phase, SVP submaximal velocity phase Significant differences in muscle activation and kinetic outcomes between the walking/carrying exercises All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. * significant difference to yoke walk, † significant difference to left hand suitcase carry, ‡ significant difference to right hand suitcase carry, ☼ significant difference to farmers walk, LH left hand, MVC maximum voluntary contraction RH right hand Pulling significant results comparisons - heavy sled pull All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. Spatiotemporal and kinematic effect sizes reported for between phase [38] and between performance standard [32], Kinetic effect sizes reported for between exercise (heavy sled pull vs back squat). A positive effect size indicates the left-hand column (higher performer or heavy sled pull) or top row (maximum velocity phase) had a greater value than the respective right-hand column (lower performer or back squat) or bottom row (acceleration phase).* significant difference to back squat, † significant difference to low performing athletes, ☼ significant difference to acceleration phase, ant/post anterior/posterior, AP acceleration phase, ave average, FS foot strike, GRF ground reaction force, med/lat medial/lateral, MVP maximum velocity phase, SC to MKE start of concentric phase to maximum knee extension, TO toe off Static lift significant result comparisons All data are reported as means ± standard deviation, unless specified otherwise. * significant difference to barbell, † significant difference to log lift, ‡ significant difference to tire flip, ☼ significant difference to lower performing athletes, § value only provided in graph form and as such are approximate values with no standard deviation, Ant/post anterior/posterior, ax axial, BD bottom of dip, comp compressive, diam diameter, EL entire lift, flex/ext flexion/extension, FP first pull, HP higher performing athlete, LO lift off, LP lower performing athlete, musc muscle, MVC maximum voluntary contraction, PP push press phase, PR propulsive duration, SP second pull, SSP start of second pull, stiff stiffness, TD total lift duration, TR top retrieve phase
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Biomechanics and Applications of Strongman Exercises: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benjamin R Hindle; Anna Lorimer; Paul Winwood; Justin W L Keogh
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2019-12-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.