| Literature DB >> 32025614 |
Gwenyth O Lee1,2, Valerie A Paz-Soldan1,3, Amy R Riley-Powell1, Andrea Gómez4, Carla Tarazona-Meza5, Katerine Villaizan Paliza6, Ramya Ambikapathi7, Katherine Ortiz1, German Comina1,8, Gustavo Hernandez1, Nehal Naik9, Richard Oberhelman1, Cesar Ugarte-Gil6,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Peru, tuberculosis (TB) is perceived as a nutritional disease. This perception, alongside factors including household food insecurity, may drive the food choices of people with TB and influence treatment outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Peru; chronic disease; food choice; food security; qualitative; tuberculosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32025614 PMCID: PMC6992465 DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Dev Nutr ISSN: 2475-2991
Baseline characteristics of study participants
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Women, % | 35.9 |
| Age | 28.8 ± 11.0 |
| Household size | 5 [3–7] |
| Baseline BMI | 21.9 ± 3.1 |
| Socioeconomic status score | 54.1 ± 9.4 |
| Prior reported tuberculosis, % | 20.5 |
| Baseline food insecure with moderate or severe hunger, % | 64.1 |
| Baseline reporting any coping strategies (past week), % | 74.4 |
| Baseline dietary diversity | 6 [4–7] |
Means ± SDs are reported for continuous variables that were distributed approximately normally, otherwise medians [IQRs] are reported, unless otherwise indicated.
Characteristics of participants at day 0 and day 30
| Day 0 ( | Day 30 ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Food insecure with moderate or severe hunger | 64.1 | N/A |
| Coping strategies | 3 [0–7] | 1 [0–6] |
| Dietary diversity | 6 [4–7] | 7 [6–8] |
| Costs related to extra food | 0 [0–14] | 25 [0–90] |
| Costs related to nutritional supplements | 0 [0–20] | 0 [0–32] |
| Changed diet because of illness | ||
| No change | 20.5 | 41.4 |
| Same foods as usual but more | 5.1 | 10.3 |
| Same foods as usual but less | 5.1 | 0.0 |
| Fewer kinds of foods than before | 5.1 | 3.5 |
| More kinds of foods than before | 59.0 | 41.4 |
| Other | 5.1 | 3.5 |
| Sources of nutritional advice (categories are nonexclusive) | ||
| Family | 82.1 | 82.8 |
| Neighbors | 7.7 | 20.7 |
| Health professional | 10.3 | 31.0 |
| TV/Internet | 7.7 | 17.2 |
| Nobody/didn't look for advice | 15.4 | 20.7 |
| Received a MINSA packet (PANTBC) | 10.3 | 48.3 |
| Among those who received packet, felt packet was important to household | 90.0 | 100 |
| Received ≥1 visit with nutritionist | 18.0 | 55.2 |
| Among those who received visit, felt time with nutritionist was useful | 75.0 | 100 |
| Among those who received visit, wanted more time with nutritionist | 87.5 | 43.8 |
Ministry of Health (MINSA); Program for Nutrition of People with Tuberculosis and Family (PANTBC); Values are medians [IQRs] for nonnormally distributed continuous variables, or percentages; N/A, not available.
Most common foods mentioned: pulses, 22.1%; fruit, 22.1%; and fish, 13.3%.
Estimated macronutrient intake of participants
| Intake | Recommendation ( | TDEEs | Recommendation to gain weight at 10% TDEE/wk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kcal/d | 2797 ± 1172 | N/A | 2215 ± 293 | 2437 ± 322 |
| % Energy from carbohydrates | 69.9 | 45–65 | N/A | N/A |
| % Energy from protein | 8.3 | 15–30 | N/A | N/A |
| % Energy from fat | 21.8 | 25–35 | N/A | N/A |
n = 32. Values are means ± SDs or percentages. N/A, not applicable; TDEE, total daily energy expenditure.
FIGURE 1Mind map of key themes. Icons are taken from the Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com/) with permission.
Overall study findings and related recommendations
|
|