Literature DB >> 32025422

The V-Sign: A Simple Radiographic Sign of Shoulder Subluxation.

Bradley Schoch1, Adam Smitherman2, Mary Beth Horodyski3, Aimee Struk2, Joseph J King2, Kevin W Farmer2, Thomas Wright2.   

Abstract

Introduction Shoulder subluxation is a common finding associated with orthopedic pathology. This study assesses the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a new radiographic sign used to identify glenohumeral subluxation. Methods Shoulders of 55 consecutive patients presenting with shoulder pain were reviewed for the presence of a "V-sign". Three shoulder surgeons reviewed all radiographs at three separate time periods in a randomized fashion. Inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were calculated. Results The V-sign was identified in 26 (47%) shoulders. Intra-rater reliability was satisfactory for all the three surgeons, with kappa values of 0.85, 0.78, and 0.77, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was similarly satisfactory, with a value of 0.71. The surgeons demonstrated 100% agreement on the direction of subluxation when a V-sign was documented. Discussion The V-sign is a reproducible radiographic sign that can be used to detect glenohumeral subluxation in patients presenting with shoulder pain.
Copyright © 2019, Schoch et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  radiographic; screening; shoulder; sign; subluxation; v-sign; x-ray

Year:  2019        PMID: 32025422      PMCID: PMC6986677          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Subluxation is commonly associated with orthopedic pathology of the shoulder [1-5]. Plain radiographs are often used as an initial screening tool in the assessment of shoulder pain. Subluxation, when present, is classified based on the direction of humeral head translation in reference to the glenoid. Some authors have offered classifications based on the severity of subluxation, but no standardized measures have been widely accepted among surgeons [6]. In the non-arthritic shoulder, subluxation may be subtle, leading clinicians to delay potential evaluation and/or treatment of shoulder pathology [7]. When screening patients with shoulder pain, the presence of shoulder subluxation may be more important as a binary variable rather than the severity. Screening tests should be inexpensive, be easy to administer, inflict minimal discomfort, and be reliable and valid. In our practice, it was noted that among patients presenting with shoulder dysfunction, radiographic signs of shoulder asymmetry were often noted. This asymmetry projects the joint space in the shape of a “V". The presence of this “V-sign” is an indication of a joint subluxation and may help identify patients who merit further workup [8]. A similar sign of subluxation has previously proven to be useful in indicating joint incongruity in proximal interphalangeal fracture-dislocations in the hand [9]. The purpose of this study is to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities of this new radiographic sign of shoulder subluxation.

Materials and methods

Following Institutional Review Board approval, 74 consecutive patients presenting to the clinic of the senior author (Thomas Wright) with shoulder X-rays were identified. Over the same time period, a total of 850 patients were seen in the office. Radiographs were obtained in all patients at the time of presentation and included anteroposterior views with internal and external rotation and axillary lateral views. Nineteen shoulders with prior reverse shoulder arthroplasty were excluded due to the semi-constrained design of the implant and its static resistance to subluxation. Thus, 55 shoulders with radiographs of the affected shoulders were available for review. Shoulder films from all study patients were compiled, de-identified, and randomized for review. Three attending shoulder surgeons, including the senior author, reviewed all radiographs at three separate time periods. Radiographs were assessed for the “V-sign” (Figure 1). In the normal relationship of the shoulder joint, the humeral head is located concentrically across from the glenoid. However, as the humeral head subluxes into a non-concentric position, the joint space consequently appears to narrow on one side and widen on the opposite side to form the V-shape. The apex of the V, therefore, points toward the direction of subluxation. A V-sign was considered to be present if the sign was recorded on at least five of the nine review readings. When present, the direction of subluxation was also recorded.
Figure 1

Illustration showing the normal glenohumeral articulation (A) and the presence of the V-sign (outlined by arrows) after subluxation of the humeral head in reference to the glenoid (B).

Summary statistics were computed to describe the study sample. All analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), specifying a level of significance of 0.05. Kappa statistics were computed to measure inter- and intra-observer reliabilities.

Results

The mean age at evaluation for the 55 shoulders was 61.5 years (range: 31-86 years). Patient X-rays were evaluated by three attending orthopedic surgeons on three separate occasions two weeks apart in a blinded manner. The V-sign was identified in 26 (47%) shoulders. The presenting diagnoses between those with and without a V-sign were distributed similarly (see Table 1 for full details). The direction of subluxation was recorded as superior (12 [46%]), inferior (6 [23%]), posterior (4 [15%]), and anterior (4 [15%]) (Figure 2).
Table 1

Clinical diagnoses of patients presenting with and without a V-sign

DiagnosisV-Sign PresentV-Sign Absent
Rotator cuff1315
Arthritis45
Instability11
Fracture21
Arthroplasty56
Frozen/stiff/spasticity11
Figure 2

Representative examples of inferior (A), superior (B), posterior (C), and anterior (D) subluxation with the presence of the V-sign (outlined by arrows).

Intra-rater reliability was satisfactory for all the three surgeons, with kappa values of 0.85, 0.78, and 0.77, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was similarly satisfactory, with a value of 0.71. Surgeons demonstrated 100% agreement on the direction of subluxation when a V-sign was documented.

Discussion

Clinically effective screening tests are inexpensive, are easy to administer, inflict minimal discomfort, and are reliable and valid. Radiographs remain the preferred screening mechanism for shoulder pain due to their relatively low cost and availability in many clinical office settings. This study represents the first step in the process of validating the V-sign as a clinical tool to screen for potential shoulder pathology, with the goal of identifying patients who would benefit from advanced imaging and specialty referral. Based on our results, the V-sign is a reliable radiographic sign that is reproducibly identified over time and among surgeons. Other reports have documented that subluxation leads to an asymmetric glenohumeral joint space. While these reports have suggested that subluxation occurs opposite the area of joint space widening, this has never been validated [7,10]. In this study, agreement among reviewers in regard to the direction of subluxation was 100%, indicating that the V-sign can also be used to identify the direction of subluxation, which may be beneficial in cases of subtle change. The next step towards validating the V-sign will be to assess its role in predicting shoulder pathology early in the disease state. Prior clinical studies have documented the presence of posterior subluxation early in the setting of primary osteoarthritis in young patients [1]. Similarly, acromiohumeral narrowing has been associated with the presence of a superior rotator cuff tear [11]. However, early subluxation of the shoulder joint has not been similarly assessed as an early sign of rotator cuff tearing. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify the ability of the V-sign to predict operative intervention and its predictive quality for various diagnoses. This study has multiple limitations, including its retrospective nature. Rotator cuff tears represented 51% of the clinical diagnoses, potentially biasing the reliability of the V-sign for other diagnoses. However, we feel this is less likely due to the fact that subluxation is well document in both primary osteoarthritis and shoulder instability, which were also included in this study [7,10]. Patients were also selected from a surgical practice, leading to selection bias and the inability to assess the predictive nature of the V-sign in relation to operative intervention. Similarly, our patient population consisted mainly of older individuals with rotator cuff and degenerative joint disease, thus limiting the ability to generalize these findings in a younger population.

Conclusions

The V-sign is a reproducible radiographic sign that can be used to detect shoulder subluxation in patients presenting with shoulder pain. Further study is needed to examine its role in predicting pathology on advanced imaging and its association with surgical intervention.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging techniques for the evaluation of glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  T G Sanders; W B Morrison; M D Miller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Radiographic evaluation of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ajay Goud; Dmitri Segal; Pejman Hedayati; John J Pan; Barbara N Weissman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results.

Authors:  M E Torchia; R H Cofield; C R Settergren
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Are radiologists superior to orthopaedic surgeons in diagnosing instability-related shoulder lesions on magnetic resonance arthrography? A multicenter reproducibility and accuracy study.

Authors:  Susan van Grinsven; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Peer C Konings; Albert van Kampen; Corné J M van Loon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 5.  [Rupture of the rotator cuff. Quantification of indirect signs in standard radiology and the Leclercq maneuver].

Authors:  P Cotty; F Proust; P Bertrand; B Fouquet; P Rosset; D Alison; J P Valat; P Rouleau; J Laffont
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1988-11

6.  Superior migration of the humeral head. A radiological aid in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  D S Weiner; I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1970-08

7.  A radiographic classification of massive rotator cuff tear arthritis.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Hamada; Kaoru Yamanaka; Yoshiyasu Uchiyama; Takahiko Mikasa; Motohiko Mikasa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance.

Authors:  Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; Bernhard Jost; Clément M L Werner; Marco Zanetti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: clinical and radiographic classification. The Aequalis Group.

Authors:  G Walch; A Boulahia; P Boileau; J F Kempf
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head: an unrecognized entity responsible for glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the young adult.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Claudio Ascani; Aziz Boulahia; Laurent Nové-Josserand; T Bradley Edwards
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.