Literature DB >> 32024972

A novel standardized test system to evaluate dynamic visual acuity post trifocal or monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a multicenter study.

Xiaotong Ren1, Yuexin Wang1, Dengting Wang2, Baohua Wu3, Lei Wu4, Yanhui Xu5, Jiarui Yang1, Zhimin Chen5, Xuemin Li6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) following implantation of trifocal with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and using a novel test system.
METHODS: The present research was a retrospective, multicenter clinical study. Two hundred and ten eyes of 149 patients that underwent cataract phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were enrolled. One hundred and ten eyes of patients received trifocal (AT LISA tri839MP, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) and 100 eyes received monofocal (Tecnis ZCB00, Abbott, United States) lenses and were evaluated 3 months after implantation. Outcome measures included monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity and best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA; logMAR units); contrast sensitivity under photopic, mesopic, with glare conditions; and dynamic visual acuity using a self-developed system.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. Monocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA were significantly better (all p < 0.001) in the trifocal IOL group, but not BCDVA. The trifocal IOL group showed better contrast sensitivity under photopic, mesopic, with or without glare conditions (p < 0.05) and statistically significantly better dynamic vision at 15, 30, 60, and 90 degrees per second (dps) compared with the monofocal group (all p < 0.001). The strength of positive association only between UIVA and dynamic visual acuity increased as the velocity increased, but not UDVA or UNVA.
CONCLUSIONS: Diffractive trifocal IOL provides better postoperative full range vision acuity, contrast sensitivity, and dynamic vision compared with monofocal IOLs. And intermediate visual acuity is increasingly associated with DVA as the velocity increasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32024972      PMCID: PMC7784919          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-0780-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  2 in total

Review 1.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

2.  Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Peter Mojzis; Lucia Kukuckova; Katarina Majerova; Peter Ziak; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Developing dynamic defocus curve for evaluating dynamic vision accommodative function.

Authors:  Tingyi Wu; Yuexin Wang; Shanshan Wei; Yining Guo; Xuemin Li
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.209

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.