Sofia Bettencourt1, José M Ferro2. 1. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. Electronic address: sofiar@campus.ul.pt. 2. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital Santa Maria/Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a frequent neurologic complication of infective endocarditis. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy in comparison to thrombolysis and to combined treatment in patients with infective endocarditis associated acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review included case reports, cases series, cross-sectional studies, case control studies, randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized controlled trials, which reported the treatment of endocarditis-related acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis in adult patients. DATA SOURCES: Scielo, b-on, Pubmed and Cochrane, from inception to April 2019. Reference lists were also checked. We compared the efficacy (independence, neurological improvement) and safety (intracranial bleeding, death) of acute ischemic stroke treatment with thrombolysis, thrombectomy and combined therapy. RESULTS: Through systematic review 37 articles describing 52 patients met criteria. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was 4.14 times higher in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (P = .001) and 4.67 times higher in patients treated with combined treatment (P = .01). There was trend for independence (P = .09) and neurological improvement (P = .07) in favor of thrombectomy, when comparing this group to the group treated with intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of the low quality of the available evidence, thrombectomy in infective endocarditis associated stroke appears to be safer than thrombolysis, or combined treatment. These results may be useful to guide clinical decisions, in selected patients.
BACKGROUND:Ischemic stroke is a frequent neurologic complication of infective endocarditis. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy in comparison to thrombolysis and to combined treatment in patients with infective endocarditis associated acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review included case reports, cases series, cross-sectional studies, case control studies, randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized controlled trials, which reported the treatment of endocarditis-related acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis in adult patients. DATA SOURCES: Scielo, b-on, Pubmed and Cochrane, from inception to April 2019. Reference lists were also checked. We compared the efficacy (independence, neurological improvement) and safety (intracranial bleeding, death) of acute ischemic stroke treatment with thrombolysis, thrombectomy and combined therapy. RESULTS: Through systematic review 37 articles describing 52 patients met criteria. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was 4.14 times higher in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (P = .001) and 4.67 times higher in patients treated with combined treatment (P = .01). There was trend for independence (P = .09) and neurological improvement (P = .07) in favor of thrombectomy, when comparing this group to the group treated with intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of the low quality of the available evidence, thrombectomy in infective endocarditis associated stroke appears to be safer than thrombolysis, or combined treatment. These results may be useful to guide clinical decisions, in selected patients.