Literature DB >> 32024568

Review: Comparative methane production in mammalian herbivores.

M T Dittmann1,2, C Vendl1, K B Hagen1, A Schwarm2, M Clauss1, S Frei1, S Ortmann3, D W H Müller4, S Hammer5, A J Munn6, M Kreuzer2.   

Abstract

Methane (CH4) production is a ubiquitous, apparently unavoidable side effect of fermentative fibre digestion by symbiotic microbiota in mammalian herbivores. Here, a data compilation is presented of in vivo CH4 measurements in individuals of 37 mammalian herbivore species fed forage-only diets, from the literature and from hitherto unpublished measurements. In contrast to previous claims, absolute CH4 emissions scaled linearly to DM intake, and CH4 yields (per DM or gross energy intake) did not vary significantly with body mass. CH4 physiology hence cannot be construed to represent an intrinsic ruminant or herbivore body size limitation. The dataset does not support traditional dichotomies of CH4 emission intensity between ruminants and nonruminants, or between foregut and hindgut fermenters. Several rodent hindgut fermenters and nonruminant foregut fermenters emit CH4 of a magnitude as high as ruminants of similar size, intake level, digesta retention or gut capacity. By contrast, equids, macropods (kangaroos) and rabbits produce few CH4 and have low CH4 : CO2 ratios for their size, intake level, digesta retention or gut capacity, ruling out these factors as explanation for interspecific variation. These findings lead to the conclusion that still unidentified host-specific factors other than digesta retention characteristics, or the presence of rumination or a foregut, influence CH4 production. Measurements of CH4 yield per digested fibre indicate that the amount of CH4 produced during fibre digestion varies not only across but also within species, possibly pointing towards variation in microbiota functionality. Recent findings on the genetic control of microbiome composition, including methanogens, raise the question about the benefits methanogens provide for many (but apparently not to the same extent for all) species, which possibly prevented the evolution of the hosting of low-methanogenic microbiota across mammals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digesta washing; foregut fermentation; hindgut fermentation; mean retention time; methanogens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32024568     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119003161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Comparisons of Corn Stover Silages after Fresh- or Ripe-Corn Harvested: Effects on Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation in Growing Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Rong Wang; Tingting Wu; Yingbai Yang; Zhixiong He; Zhiyuan Ma; Zhiliang Tan; Bo Lin; Min Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Factors shaping the abundance and diversity of the gut archaeome across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Courtney M Thomas; Elie Desmond-Le Quéméner; Simonetta Gribaldo; Guillaume Borrel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Vertebrate host phylogeny influences gut archaeal diversity.

Authors:  Nicholas D Youngblut; Georg H Reischer; Silke Dauser; Sophie Maisch; Chris Walzer; Gabrielle Stalder; Andreas H Farnleitner; Ruth E Ley
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 4.  Anaerobic Fungi: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Matthias Hess; Shyam S Paul; Anil K Puniya; Mark van der Giezen; Claire Shaw; Joan E Edwards; Kateřina Fliegerová
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies.

Authors:  John L Black; Thomas M Davison; Ilona Box
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.