| Literature DB >> 32024514 |
Sasikala M Chinnappan1, Annie George2, Godavarthi Ashok3,4, Yogendra Kumar Choudhary3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Each year 1.5 million women experience menopause when menstrual cycles cease resulting from the loss of ovarian function and oestrogen deprivation, a hormone that helps prevent bone loss. This study investigated the effects of Physta®, a standardized herbal extract of Eurycoma longifolia Jack (PEL), on hormonal balance and parameters associated with hormonal imbalance, namely body and uterus weight and bone biochemical markers relevant in menopausal symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: Eurycoma longifolia; Hormonal balance; Ovariectomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32024514 PMCID: PMC7076899 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-2814-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1HPLC profile of PEL water extract. a The major peak corresponds to Eurycomanone at RT 12.629 min. b Eurycomanone standard eluted at RT 12.628 min. c UV spectrum of Eurycomanone with respect to its’retention time
Fig. 2Randomization and Treatment Schedule Flow Chart
Effect of PEL on percentage (%) rat body weight gain
| Groups | Weight (g) | Percentage Weight Gain (%) Week 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Week 8 | ||
| Group A Sham control | 186.8 ± 9.60 | 242.1 ± 7.62 | 29.86 ± 1.98 |
| Group B Untreated | 185.1 ± 5.45 | 261.1 ± 7.73 | 41.22 ± 2.85## |
| Group C PEL 100 mg/kg | 185.4 ± 5.32 | 258.5 ± 6.82 | 39.59 ± 1.66 |
| Group D PEL 300 mg/kg | 185.4 ± 6.28 | 253.9 ± 7.20 | 37.41 ± 3.31 |
| Group E PEL 500 mg/kg | 185.8 ± 6.23 | 252.5 ± 8.31 | 36.00 ± 1.44 |
| Group F Positive control | 185.0 ± 3.35 | 259.3 ± 4.85 | 40.14 ± 0.73 |
Data stated as mean ± SEM; ##P < 0.01 vs. Group A
Effect of PEL on uterus weight
| UTERUS WEIGHT (mg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F |
| 679.06 ± 6.65 | 238.81 ± 5.39### | 235.84 ± 4.03 | 240.73 ± 2.93 | 256.39 ± 4.41 | 389.74 ± 8.26*** |
Data stated as mean ± SEM; ### P < 0.001 vs. Group A; ***P < 0.001 vs. Group B
Effect of PEL on serum calcium, phosphate, BALP and osteocalcin levels
| Groups | Calcium (mg/dl) | Phosphate (mg/dl) | Bone Alkaline phosphatase (ng/ml) | Osteocalcin (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A Sham control | 9.05 ± 0.20 | 3.71 ± 0.14 | 3.43 ± 0.11 | 7.13 ± 0.34 |
| Group B Untreated | 7.86 ± 0.12### | 2.83 ± 0.12### | 2.54 ± 0.20### | 7.86 ± 0.48 |
| Group C 100 mg/kg | 7.85 ± 0.12 | 2.83 ± 0.11 | 2.57 ± 0.04 | 7.89 ± 0.06 |
| Group D 300 mg/kg | 7.98 ± 0.11 | 2.89 ± 0.08 | 2.70 ± 0.11 | 7.79 ± 0.21 |
| Group E 500 mg/kg | 8.11 ± 0.11 | 3.01 ± 0.12 | 2.82 ± 0.10 | 7.52 ± 0.18 |
| Group F Positive control | 8.48 ± 0.16* | 3.29 ± 0.13* | 3.06 ± 0.12* | 7.26 ± 0.20 |
Data stated as mean ± SEM; ##P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. Group A; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. Group B
Effect of PEL on serum FSH, LH, progesterone, oestrogen and testosterone levels
| Groups | FSH (mIU/ml) | LH (mIU/ml) | Progesterone (ng/ml) | Oestrogen (pg/ml) | Testosterone (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A Sham control | 2.26 ± 0.07 | 1.73 ± 0.05 | 5.78 ± 0.25 | 29.31 ± 0.60 | 4.48 ± 0.21 |
| Group B Untreated | 5.70 ± 0.33### | 4.69 ± 0.22### | 1.82 ± 0.09### | 9.49 ± 0.27### | 1.22 ± 0.06### |
| Group C PEL 100 mg/kg | 5.29 ± 0.27 | 4.57 ± 0.18 | 1.88 ± 0.05 | 9.52 ± 0.15 | 1.21 ± 0.04 |
| Group D PEL 300 mg/kg | 4.87 ± 0.20 | 4.36 ± 0.20 | 1.96 ± 0.09 | 10.18 ± 0.28 | 1.31 ± 0.03 |
| Group E PEL 500 mg/kg | 4.25 ± 0.22*** | 4.07 ± 0.12 | 2.48 ± 0.08* | 11.02 ± 0.13* | 1.83 ± 0.03 |
| Group F Positive control | 3.96 ± 0.22*** | 3.76 ± 0.11** | 3.31 ± 0.15*** | 12.35 ± 0.25*** | 13.01 ± 0.41*** |
Data stated as mean ± SEM; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. Group A; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. Group B