Literature DB >> 32024424

Shared Decision Making: From Decision Science to Data Science.

Azza Shaoibi1, Brian Neelon2, Leslie A Lenert1,3.   

Abstract

Background. Accurate diagnosis of patients' preferences is central to shared decision making. Missing from clinical practice is an approach that links pretreatment preferences and patient-reported outcomes. Objective. We propose a Bayesian collaborative filtering (CF) algorithm that combines pretreatment preferences and patient-reported outcomes to provide treatment recommendations. Design. We present the methodological details of a Bayesian CF algorithm designed to accomplish 3 tasks: 1) eliciting patient preferences using conjoint analysis surveys, 2) clustering patients into preference phenotypes, and 3) making treatment recommendations based on the posttreatment satisfaction of like-minded patients. We conduct a series of simulation studies to test the algorithm and to compare it to a 2-stage approach. Results. The Bayesian CF algorithm and 2-stage approaches performed similarly when there was extensive overlap between preference phenotypes. When the treatment was moderately associated with satisfaction, both methods made accurate recommendations. The kappa estimates measuring agreement between the true and predicted recommendations were 0.70 (95% confidence interval = 0.052-0.88) and 0.73 (0.56-0.90) under the Bayesian CF and 2-stage approaches, respectively. The 2-stage approach failed to converge in settings in which clusters were well separated, whereas the Bayesian CF algorithm produced acceptable results, with kappas of 0.73 (0.56-0.90) and 0.83 (0.69-0.97) for scenarios with moderate and large treatment effects, respectively. Limitations. Our approach assumes that the patient population is composed of distinct preference phenotypes, there is association between treatment and outcomes, and treatment effects vary across phenotypes. Findings are also limited to simulated data. Conclusion. The Bayesian CF algorithm is feasible, provides accurate cluster treatment recommendations, and outperforms 2-stage estimation when clusters are well separated. As such, the approach serves as a roadmap for incorporating predictive analytics into shared decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collaborative filtering; conjoint analysis; preference phenotypes; recommender systems; shared decision making; treatment recommendation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32024424      PMCID: PMC7676870          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20903267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  21 in total

1.  Patient preferences for an oral anticoagulant after major orthopedic surgery: results of a german survey.

Authors:  Thomas Wilke
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Bayesian nonparametric hierarchical modeling.

Authors:  David B Dunson
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Ateesha F Mohamed; Henrik W Finnern; Anette Woehl; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.

Authors:  Emily Oshima Lee; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; S Mowle; M Wensing; C Wilkinson; P Kinnersley; R Grol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-04

7.  Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  L A Lenert; R M Soetikno
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Towards collaborative filtering recommender systems for tailored health communications.

Authors:  Benjamin M Marlin; Roy J Adams; Rajani Sadasivam; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 9.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Ratté; Karine Gravel; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-26

10.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.

Authors:  Karine Gravel; France Légaré; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Literature Review and Content Analysis of Frameworks.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Mohamed Elsaid; Jonathan Paskett; Seuli Bose-Brill; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.