| Literature DB >> 32024330 |
Su Jin Choi1, Jung Eun Kwon1, Da Eun Roh1, Myung Chul Hyun1, Hanna Jung2, Young Ok Lee2, Joon Yong Cho2, Yeo Hyang Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The decision to use transannular patching (TAP) during tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair depends on the pulmonary valve annulus size; the z score of the pulmonary annulus is the most commonly used predictor. However, definitive results are not obtained with z scores as different z score data sets are used for different parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Pulmonary valve; Surgery; Tetralogy of Fallot
Year: 2019 PMID: 32024330 PMCID: PMC7254174 DOI: 10.3345/kjp.2019.01060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Pediatr ISSN: 2713-4148
Patients’ demographic characteristics
| Variable | PV preservation (n=29) | TAP (n=33) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex, male:female | 18:11 | 22:11 |
| Morphology of PV | ||
| Tricuspid | 4[ | 0 |
| Bicuspid | 24 | 24 |
| Monocuspid | 1 | 9[ |
| Supravalvular pulmonary stenosis | ||
| Main PA | 7 | 17[ |
| Peripheral PA | 0 | 3 |
| Diffuse hypoplasia of PA | 6 | 9 |
| Operation | ||
| Palliative operation before total correction | ||
| BT shunt | 0 | 4 |
| RVOT reconstruction | 0 | 4 |
| left PA angioplasty | 2 | 1 |
| Median age (mo) on total correction | 7 | 8 |
| Infundibullectomy | 25 | 28 |
| RVOT incision | 17 | 33[ |
| Commissurotomy | 19[ | 4 |
| Timing of reoperation | ||
| During total correction operation | 2 | 0 |
| During postoperative follow-up period | 1 | 2 |
Values are presented as number.
PV, pulmonary valve; TAP, transannular patch; PA, pulmonary artery; BT shunt, Blalock-Taussig shunt; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract.
P<0.05, statistically significant difference between groups.
Fig. 1.Cusps of the pulmonary valve of a patient with tetralogy of Fallot on a cardiac computed tomography scan. Bicuspid pulmonary valve (A) and tricuspid pulmonary valve (B). AO, aorta; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; PV, pulmonary valve; RA, right atrium.
Fig. 2.Echocardiographic results. (A) z scores for the pulmonary valve (PV) annulus in the PV preservation and transannular patch (TAP) groups (P=0.004). (B) Ratio of PV annulus to aortic valve (AV) annulus size in the PV preservation and TAP groups (P=0.002). (C) Ratio of the PV annulus to descending aorta (DAO) size in the PV preservation and TAP groups (P=0.008).
Fig. 3.Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the z scores of the pulmonary valve (PV) annulus, ratio of the PV annulus to aortic valve (AV) annulus size, and ratio of the PV annulus to descending aorta (DAO) size cutoff value for transannular patch (TAP) repair. Blue line represents the z score of the PV annulus (area under the curve [AUC]=0.698; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.556–0.840). Red line represents the ratio of the PV annulus to AV annulus size (AUC=0.741; 95% CI, 0.607–0.879). Green line represents the ratio of the PV annulus to DAO size (AUC=0.669; 95% CI, 0.521–0.816).