| Literature DB >> 32024185 |
Bogdan Pascu1,2, Cristina Ardean1,2, Corneliu Mircea Davidescu1, Adina Negrea1,2, Mihaela Ciopec1,2, Narcis Duțeanu1,2, Petru Negrea1,2, Gerlinde Rusu1.
Abstract
:The aim of this study is to investigate the silver recovery from aqueous solutions. There are a variety of recovery methods, such as hydrometallurgical, bio-metallurgical, cementation, reduction, electrocoagulation, electrodialysis, ion exchange, etc. Adsorption represents a convenient, environment friendly procedure, that can be used to recover silver from aqueous solutions. In this paper we highlight the silver adsorption mechanism on chitosan chemically modified with active groups, through kinetic, thermodynamic, and equilibrium studies. A maximum adsorption capacity of 103.6 mg Ag(I)/g of adsorbent for an initial concentration of 700 mg/L was noticed by using modified chitosan. Lower adsorption capacity has been noticed in unmodified chitosan-a maximum of 75.43 mg Ag(I)/g. Optimum contact time was 120 min and the process had a maximum efficiency when conducted at pH higher than 6. At the same time, a way is presented to obtain metallic silver from the adsorbent materials used for the recovery of the silver from aqueous solutions.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; chitosan; functionalization; silver recovery
Year: 2020 PMID: 32024185 PMCID: PMC7040575 DOI: 10.3390/ma13030657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The structure of: (a) chitosan (Ch), and (b) dodecyl-triphenyl-phosphonium bromide (DDTPPBr).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy of new produced adsorbent material: (a) SEM and (b) X-ray energy dispersion—EDX.
Figure 3Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, FT-IR for the materials: (a) Ch and (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Figure 4The influence of pH on the adsorption process.
Figure 5Contact time and temperature influence (a) Ch; (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Figure 6Pseudo first-order kinetic model (a) Ch; (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Figure 7Pseudo second-order kinetic model (a) Ch; (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Kinetic parameters for adsorption of Ag (I) on the adsorbent materials.
| Parameter | qe,exp, mg/g | Pseudo-first Order | Pseudo-second Order | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp., K | qe,calc, mg/g | k1, | R2 | qe,calc, | k2, | R2 | |
|
| |||||||
| 298 | 1.98 | 1.46 | 0.0078 | 0.7691 | 2.04 | 0.2937 | 0.9739 |
| 308 | 2.17 | 1.70 | 0.0120 | 0.9415 | 2.30 | 0.3734 | 0.9909 |
| 318 | 2.26 | 1.72 | 0.0019 | 0.9030 | 2.32 | 0.5124 | 0.9905 |
|
| |||||||
| 298 | 2.29 | 1.28 | 0.0049 | 0.8663 | 2.43 | 0.6877 | 0.9981 |
| 308 | 2.43 | 1.44 | 0.0067 | 0.9019 | 2.53 | 1.0604 | 0.9996 |
| 318 | 2.46 | 1.25 | 0.0079 | 0.9187 | 2.63 | 1.4135 | 0.9997 |
Figure 8Van’t Hoff plots for the adsorption of Ag (I) onto (a) Ch and (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Ag(I) on the adsorbent materials.
| Materials | ΔH°, kJ/(mol) | ΔS°, kJ/(mol·K) | ΔG°, kJ/mol | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298 K | 303 K | 308 K | ||||
| Ch | 31.4 | 0.106 | −0.36 | −1.42 | −2.24 | 0.9993 |
| Ch-DDTPPBr | 81.8 | 0.284 | −2.84 | −5.68 | −8.52 | 0.9974 |
Figure 9Activation energy (a) Ch; (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Figure 10Isotherm model for adsorption of Ag (I) on the adsorbent materials (a) Ch; (b) Ch-DDTPPBr.
Parameters of isotherm model for adsorption of Ag(I) on the adsorbent materials.
| Materials | qm,exp, | Freundlich Isotherm | Langmuir Isotherm | Sips Isotherm | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KF, | 1/nf | χ2 | KL, | qL, | χ2 | Ks | qs, mg/g | 1/ns | χ2 | ||
| Ch | 75.34 | 4.59 | 0.51 | 1.51 | 0.011 | 100.8 | 0.02 | 0.0026 | 85.40 | 3.9 | 0.13 |
| Ch-DDTPPBr | 103.6 | 6.81 | 0.46 | 1.69 | 0.009 | 135.8 | 0.01 | 0.0061 | 113.7 | 2.1 | 0.08 |
Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities obtained for different adsorbents.
| Absorbents | Maximum Adsorption Capacities | References |
|---|---|---|
| CMC/CMCTS and SSS powder hydrogel | 0.451 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Grapefruit peels, GP | 10.92 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Grapefruit peels modified with urea, GPU | 66.83 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Grapefruit peels modified with melamine, GPM | 28.05 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Biosolids biochar | 43.9 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Stillage residue biochar | 23.0 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Coconut shell activated carbon | 55.0 mg Ag(I)/g | [ |
| Chitosan, Ch | 75.34 mg Ag(I)/g | This paper |
| Chitosan functionalized with dodecyl-triphenyl-phosphonium bromide, Ch-DDTPPBr | 103.6 mg Ag(I)/g | This paper |
Figure 11Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy dispersion in order to highlight the obtaining of metallic silver (a) SEM; (b) EDX.