| Literature DB >> 32024059 |
Eliška Matušková1, Jan Honzíček1.
Abstract
This paper reports a strong drying activity of manganese(III) acetylacetonate. It is documented on several solvent-borne and high-solid alkyd binders. Solubility problems, which often appear upon application of new primary driers, were overEntities:
Keywords: EPR spectroscopy; Raman spectroscopy; alkyd paints; infrared spectroscopy; manganese; primary drier
Year: 2020 PMID: 32024059 PMCID: PMC7041375 DOI: 10.3390/ma13030642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Scheme 1Chemical formulas of (a) manganese(III) acetylacetonate (Mn) and (b) cobalt(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (Co).
Drying times and relative hardness for formulations of medium oil-length alkyd resins.
| Binder | Drier | C (wt.%) | τ1 (h) | τ2 (h) | τ3 (h) | τ4 (h) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mn | 0.1 | - | 0.5 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 19.5 | 35.8 |
| 0.06 | - | 0.8 | 9.0 | 12.2 | 19.6 | 35.2 | ||
| 0.03 | - | 2.0 | 7.0 | 10.3 | 20.0 | 35.1 | ||
| 0.01 | - | 3.5 | 8.3 | 12.3 | 19.1 | 33.4 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | - | 0.4 | 7.7 | >24 | 22.5 | 49.1 | |
| 0.06 | - | 1.1 | 7.1 | >24 | 29.7 | 49.7 | ||
| 0.03 | - | 1.2 | 9.3 | >24 | 24.5 | 46.2 | ||
| 0.01 | - | 18.1 | >24 | >24 | 24.5 | 43.6 | ||
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 7.6 | 9.3 | 18.2 | 35.3 |
| 0.06 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 20.2 | 34.0 | ||
| 0.03 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 7.2 | 7.9 | 20.0 | 35.2 | ||
| 0.01 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 19.8 | 33.6 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 9.7 | >24 | 25.5 | 49.1 | |
| 0.06 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 13.2 | 15.9 | 23.1 | 47.2 | ||
| 0.03 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 10.8 | 17.3 | 25.0 | 39.4 | ||
| 0.01 | 11.9 | 14.0 | 16.6 | 20.2 | 24.0 | 36.2 |
Drying times and relative hardness for formulations of long oil-length alkyd resins.
| Binder | Drier | C (wt.%) | τ1 (h) | τ2 (h) | τ3 (h) | τ4 (h) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mn | 0.1 | - | 0.6 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 17.7 | 20.4 |
| 0.06 | - | 0.8 | 4.4 | 7.5 | 16.4 | 18.6 | ||
| 0.03 | - | 1.8 | 5.5 | 9.1 | 16.9 | 18.0 | ||
| 0.01 | - | 3.2 | 7.6 | 9.8 | 15.3 | 16.6 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | - | 0.9 | 4.1 | 12.8 | 21.9 | 43.4 | |
| 0.06 | - | 1.9 | 6.4 | 11.8 | 19.3 | 39.7 | ||
| 0.03 | - | 3.7 | 5.9 | 10.5 | 17.7 | 37.0 | ||
| 0.01 | - | 11.2 | 14.4 | 17.8 | 14.7 | 30.9 | ||
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 6.9 | 9.2 | 11.6 | 20.6 |
| 0.06 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 9.3 | 11.0 | 20.4 | ||
| 0.03 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 7.9 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 19.9 | ||
| 0.01 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 7.4 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 19.2 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 8.7 | 18.4 | 15.2 | 35.1 | |
| 0.06 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 15.8 | 18.9 | 13.7 | 32.5 | ||
| 0.03 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 11.1 | 16.9 | 13.1 | 30.2 | ||
| 0.01 | 14.3 | 14.8 | 15.7 | 19.9 | – 1 | – 1 |
1 Not measured.
Figure 1(a) Coloration of Mn/S471 formulations and a comparison with samples of neat S471 and Co/S471 (0.1 wt.%); (b) Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectrum of Mn/S471 formulation (0.1 wt.%; top) and its derivation (bottom) measured after 10 days of in closed vial (ν = 9.4274 GHz, |Aiso| = 93.4 × 10−4 T, giso = 1.9985).
Coloration of coatings of S471 treated with Mn and Co. 1
| Binder | Drier | C (wt.%) | *L | *a | *b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 99.4/99.7 | −0.10/–0.17 | 0.95/0.92 |
| 0.06 | 99.6/99.8 | −0.07/–0.12 | 0.47/0.43 | ||
| 0.03 | 99.6/99.6 | −0.07/–0.10 | 0.33/0.31 | ||
| 0.01 | 99.9/99.8 | –0.06/–0.10 | 0.16/0.26 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 99.7/99.6 | −0.17/–0.12 | 0.50/0.63 | |
| 0.06 | 99.7/99.8 | −0.15/–0.13 | 0.42/0.45 | ||
| 0.03 | 99.4/99.9 | −0.10/–0.08 | 0.26/0.31 | ||
| 0.01 | 99.6/99.8 | –0.06/–0.09 | 0.14/0.28 |
1 Values “m/n” signify data collected 3 days (m) and 60 days after application (n). Wet thickness: 120-μm.
Drying times of test coatings for formulations of high-solid alkyd binders.1.
| Binder. | Drier | C (wt.%) | τ1 (h) | τ2 (h) | τ3 (h) | τ4 (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 1.6/1.7 | 2.7/5.2 | 6.6/8.8 | 6.6/8.8 |
| 0.06 | 2.0/2.2 | 3.1/5.7 | 6.1/8.5 | 6.1/8.5 | ||
| 0.03 | 3.3/3.4 | 4.4/4.6 | 5.5/7.4 | 6.7/7.4 | ||
| 0.01 | 5.0/5.2 | 6.2/6.6 | 7.5/7.5 | 7.5/7.7 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.9/1.1 | 2.2/2.8 | 5.5/10.4 | 9.9/>24 | |
| 0.06 | 1.1/1.2 | 2.5/3.2 | 4.3/11.3 | 7.1/17.4 | ||
| 0.03 | 1.8/2.2 | 2.6/6.7 | 5.9/11.3 | 7.9/>24 | ||
| 0.01 | 6.3/6.7 | 7.8/7.9 | 8.6/9.4 | 15.0/>24 | ||
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 1.4/1.5 | 1.8/2.4 | 2.7/3.0 | 4.1/8.6 |
| 0.06 | 1.5/2.0 | 2.4/3.3 | 2.8/3.7 | 7.1/9.2 | ||
| 0.03 | 2.8/3.1 | 3.2/3.5 | 4.5/5.1 | 7.0/10.1 | ||
| 0.01 | 5.9/6.1 | 6.3/6.7 | 8.8/8.8 | 11.8/12.4 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.2/0.2 | 0.3/1.1 | 0.7/2.7 | >24/>24 | |
| 0.06 | 0.7/0.5 | 1.3/1.3 | 1.3/2.0 | 13.2/>24 | ||
| 0.03 | 1.2/0.9 | 2.1/1.7 | 2.1/4.5 | 3.0/10.7 | ||
| 0.01 | 3.3/2.9 | 5.7/4.9 | 5.7/4.9 | 9.8/10.6 | ||
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 2.0/2.1 | 2.7/3.6 | 3.6/8.8 | 18.8/>24 |
| 0.06 | 2.6/2.5 | 3.5/4.1 | 3.8/8.1 | >24/>24 | ||
| 0.03 | 4.1/3.8 | 5.2/4.9 | 5.2/8.0 | >24/>24 | ||
| 0.01 | 9.0/8.5 | 10.3/10.0 | 11.8/11.2 | >24/>24 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.4/0.6 | 2.3/8.0 | 8.1/>24 | 8.1/>24 | |
| 0.06 | 1.2/1.3 | 1.6/4.0 | 8.8/>24 | >24/>24 | ||
| 0.03 | 2.2/2.2 | 2.8/6.1 | 5.0/9.0 | >24/>24 | ||
| 0.01 | 4.4/4.6 | 5.4/5.7 | 6.3/11.3 | >24/>24 |
1 Values “m/n” signify drying time for coating of 38 µm wet thickness (m) and 76 µm wet thickness (n).
Relative hardness (in %) of test coatings for formulations of high-solid alkyd binders.1.
| Drier | C (wt.%) | FP07 | SP00 | TI870 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn | 0.1 | 7.9/11.7 | 10.4/11.3 | 6.5/13.2 |
| 0.06 | 7.4/10.7 | 10.0/11.1 | 6.6/13.4 | |
| 0.03 | 6.6/9.6 | 9.8/11.2 | 6.6/10.6 | |
| 0.01 | 6.1/8.0 | 9.7/10.7 | 5.5/9.4 | |
| Co | 0.1 | 8.7/16.6 | 9.0/17.2 | 9.7/27.2 |
| 0.06 | 8.0/13.8 | 8.4/15.6 | 8.8/24.3 | |
| 0.03 | 7.3/10.6 | 8.3/12.8 | 7.3/19.8 | |
| 0.01 | 6.5/10.8 | 8.5/11.0 | 6.3/14.8 |
1 Values “m/n” signify relative hardness estimated 10 days (m) and 100 days after application (n).
Figure 2Time development of the infrared band νa(cis-C=C–H) at 3008 cm−1 attributed to non-conjugated double bond system: (a) Linear plot for S471/Mn at different metal concentration; (b) logarithmic plot for S471/Mn.
Figure 3Time development of the infrared band ω(cis-trans-C=C–H) at 989 cm−1 attributed to conjugated double bond system.
Kinetic parameters for Mn/S471 and Co/S471.1.
| Binder | Drier | C (wt.%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mn | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.85 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 0.06 | 0.3 | 1.46 | 0.8 | 0.9 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.9 | 1.05 | 1.6 | 1.7 | ||
| 0.01 | 2.2 | 0.65 | 3.2 | 3.4 | ||
| Co | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.18 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
| 0.06 | 0.5 | 1.55 | 0.9 | 1.0 | ||
| 0.03 | 2.0 | 0.81 | 2.9 | 3.0 | ||
| 0.01 | 6.9 | 0.45 | 8.4 | 8.7 |
1 Data estimated by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy using ATR sampling method.
Figure 4Development of νa(cis-C=C–H) in time for coatings of Mn/S471 (0.03 wt.%). Labels refer to wet thickness of given coatings.
Figure 5Development of the bands of νa(cis-C=C–H) and ν(C=C) in the Raman spectra of Mn/S471 (Green and orange lines represent the first and the last spectrum in the series, respectively.).