| Literature DB >> 32023262 |
Junmi Lu1, Hongjing Zang1, Hongmei Zheng1, Yuting Zhan1, Yang Yang1, Yuting Zhang1, Sile Liu1, Juan Feng1, Qiuyuan Wen1, Mengping Long1, Songqing Fan1.
Abstract
The Akt (protein kinase B)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which is dysregulated in various cancers, controls the assembly of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4E) complex. However, whether aberrant expression of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt), phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) and phosphorylated eIF4E (p-eIF4E) is associated with clinicopathological characteristics in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been rarely reported. Here, we investigated expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins in NSCLC by immunohistochemistry and evaluated their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance. The results showed that the positive percentage of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E was higher in NSCLC. Additionally, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E was dramatically higher in lung adenocarcinoma (both P<0.05). Most importantly, NSCLC patients with lymph node metastasis had significantly elevated expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E (all P<0.05). Positive expression of p-Akt, and any positive expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins were positively correlated with clinical stages (both P<0.05). Spearman's rank correlation test revealed that expression of p-Akt was correlated with p-eIF4E and p-mTOR (r = 0.107, P = 0.047; r = 0.287, P<0.001, respectively). Also, p-eIF4E had positive correlation with p-mTOR (r = 0.265, P<0.001). Furthermore, NSCLC patients with increased expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E, and any positive expression of above three proteins had lower overall survival rates (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis further indicated thatp-eIF4E was an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC patients (P = 0.046). Taken together, overexpression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis of NSCLC patients after surgical resection, and positive expression of p-eIF4E protein may act as an independent unfavorable prognostic biomarker for overall survival of NSCLC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023262 PMCID: PMC7001968 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins in NSCLC and non-cancerous lung tissue was detected by immunohistochemistry.
Positive expression of p-Akt was mainly located in the cytoplasm, a few in nucleus or membrane of lung ADC (Fig 1A) and lung SCC (Fig 1D); and no positive staining of IgG isotype-matched control antibody in lung SCC (Fig 1G); positive expression of p-mTOR was indicated mainly in the cytoplasm of lung ADC (Fig 1B) and lung SCC (Fig 1E); and negative expression of p-mTOR protein in lung ADC (Fig 1H); positive expression of p-eIF4E was predominantly located in the cytoplasm of lung ADC (Fig 1C) and lung SCC (Fig 1F); no positive expression of p-eIF4E protein in non-cancerous lung tissue (Fig 1I) (DAB staining, magnification 200×).
Fig 2The comparison of expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins in NSCLC and non-cancerous lung tissue (Non-CLT).
Results showed that positive expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins was significantly higher in NSCLC than that in the Non-CLT (P<0.001).
Analysis of the association between the expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC (n = 341).
| Clinicopathological characteristics | p-Akt | p-mTOR | p-eIF4E | p-Akt/p-mTOR/p-eIF4E | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P (%) | N (%) | P (%) | N (%) | P (%) | N (%) | P+ | N- | |||||
| <55 | 96(70.1) | 41(29.9) | 78(56.9) | 59(43.1) | 94(68.6) | 43(31.4) | 128(93.4) | 9(6.6) | ||||
| ≥55 | 137(67.2) | 67(32.8) | 0.570 | 116(56.9) | 88(43.1) | 0.990 | 148(72.5) | 56(27.5) | 0.432 | 180(88.2) | 24(11.8) | 0.112 |
| Male | 177(69.1) | 79(30.9) | 133(52) | 123(48.0) | 179(69.9) | 77(30.1) | 231(90.2) | 25(9.8) | ||||
| Female | 56(65.9) | 29(34.1) | 0.576 | 61(71.8) | 24(28.2) | 0.001 | 63(74.1) | 22(25.9) | 0.460 | 77(90.6) | 8(9.4) | 0.924 |
| Smoker | 89(60.5) | 58(39.5) | 0.022 | 83(56.5) | 64(43.5) | 0.889 | 101(68.7) | 46(31.3) | 0.423 | 125(85.0) | 22(15.0) | 0.004 |
| Non-smoker | 144(49.0) | 50(51.0) | 111(57.2) | 83(42.8) | 141(72.7) | 53(27.3) | 183(94.3) | 11(5.7) | ||||
| ADC | 117(64.3) | 65(35.7) | 133(73.1) | 49(26.9) | 142(78.0) | 40(22.0) | 168(92.3) | 14(7.7) | ||||
| SCC | 116(73.0) | 43(27.0) | 0.086 | 61(38.4) | 98(61.6) | 0.000 | 100(62.9) | 59(37.1) | 0.002 | 140(88.1) | 19(11.9) | 0.185 |
| Stage I and II | 105(62.5) | 63(37.5) | 87(51.8) | 81(48.2) | 113(67.3) | 55(32.7) | 146(86.9) | 22(13.1) | ||||
| Stage III | 128(74.0) | 45(26.0) | 0.023 | 107(61.8) | 66(38.2) | 0.061 | 129(74.6) | 44(25.4) | 0.137 | 162(93.6) | 11(6.4) | 0.035 |
| No LNM | 86(61.9) | 53(38.1) | 69(49.6) | 70(50.4) | 90(64.7) | 49(35.3) | 121(87.1) | 18(12.9) | ||||
| LNM | 147(72.8) | 55(27.2) | 0.033 | 125(61.9) | 77(38.1) | 0.025 | 152(75.2) | 50(24.8) | 0.036 | 187(92.6) | 15(7.4) | 0.090 |
| Well and moderate | 103(66) | 53(34.0) | 80(51.3) | 76(48.7) | 101(64.7) | 55(35.3) | 137(87.8) | 19(12.2) | ||||
| Poor | 130(70.3) | 55(29.7) | 0.401 | 114(61.6) | 71(38.4) | 0.055 | 141(76.2) | 44(23.8) | 0.020 | 171(92.4) | 14(7.6) | 0.151 |
Abbreviations: ADC: lung adenocarcinoma, SCC: lung squamous carcinoma, LN: lymph node, LNM: lymph node metastasis
*: statistically significant (p < 0.05), statistical analysis was performed P+: positive expression of any positive of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E; N-: common negative staining of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E
The pairwise association between expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins in 341 cases of NSCLC.
| p-Akt | p-mTOR | p-eIF4E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| p-Akt | |||
| Spearman’s correlation coefficient | 1 | 0.107 | 0.287 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | - | 0.047 | <0.001 |
| p-mTOR | |||
| Spearman’s correlation coefficient | 0.107 | 1 | 0.265 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.047 | - | <0.001 |
| p-eIF4E | |||
| Spearman’s correlation coefficient | 0.287 | 0.265 | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | <0.001 | <0.001 | - |
NOTE. Values are Spearman's correlation coefficient
* Correlation is significant at the P < 0.05 level (2-tailed)
** Correlation is significant at the P < 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Fig 3Kaplan-Meier analysis to plot the survival curve of NSCLC patients with expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins and statistical significance were statistically evaluated by the log-rank test.
Fig 3A: There was worse overall survival for NSCLC patients with p-Akt positive expression compared to patients with p-Akt negative staining (P = 0.045, two sided). Fig 3B: Result showed that statistically significant shorter overall survival for NSCLC patients with expression of p-mTOR protein compared to patients with p-mTOR negative expression (P = 0.030, two sided). Fig 3C: Kaplan-Meier curves indicated significantly shorter overall survival for NSCLC patients with expression of p-eIF4E compared to patients with negative expression of p-eIF4E (P = 0.001, two sided). Fig 3D: Kaplan-Meier curves also revealed worse overall survival for NSCLC patients with expression of any positive of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proteins compared to patients with common negative staining of three proteins above (P = 0.011, two sided).
Summary of multivariate statistical analysis of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-eIF4E protein expression for overall survival rates in NSCLC patients (n = 341).
| Variables | SE | Wald | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95.0% CI for Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| .189 | .025 | .875 | .971 | .670 | 1.405 | |
| .234 | 2.510 | .113 | .690 | .437 | 1.092 | |
| .212 | 3.465 | .073 | 1.407 | .952 | 2.179 | |
| .223 | 4.802 | .028 | 1.630 | 1.053 | 2.522 | |
| .217 | .000 | .990 | .997 | .651 | 1.527 | |
| .193 | 3.413 | .065 | 1.429 | .978 | 2.088 | |
| .218 | 8.594 | .003 | 1.894 | 1.236 | 2.903 | |
| .225 | .247 | .620 | 1.118 | .719 | 1.739 | |
| .215 | 1.461 | .227 | 1.297 | .851 | 1.978 | |
| .249 | 3.984 | .046 | 1.642 | 1.009 | 2.673 | |
Abbreviations: LNM, lymph node metastasis; SE, standard error (SE); Wald, wald test; Sig, significance; Exp (B), exponentiation of the B coefficient; CI, confidence interval.
Note: multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression
*P<0.05.