Rongrong Wang1, Xihao Dong1, Xuan Zhang2, Shuyuan Gan3, Limin Kong1, Xiaoyang Lu1, Yuefeng Rao1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 2. Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The incorrect or insufficient prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common in practice. A clinical pharmacist-led guidance team (CPGT) was established and included in general surgery teams. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the CPGT on the improvement of PONV and prophylaxis administration. METHODS: A prospective before-after study was conducted on 156 female patients undergoing abdominal surgery at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital from December 2016 to December 2017. A total of 82 patients were enrolled in the preintervention period, and 74 patients were included in the post-intervention period. The CPGT established the evidence-based criteria for prophylactic anti-emetic administration and conducted interventions, including a review of medical records, provision of feedback, educational outreach, and dedicated support. Primary outcomes included the incidence of PONV within 24 hours of surgery, administered number of prophylactic anti-emetics, and accuracy of the timing for prophylactic anti-emetics. Outcomes were analysed by logistic regression or multivariable linear regression. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After intervention, patients reported significantly less PONV (33.78% vs 56.10%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; numbers needed to treat [NNT]: 3.47), vomiting (29.73% vs 45.12%; OR: 0.42; NNT: 5.16) and nausea (31.08% vs 56.10%; OR: 0.24; NNT: 3.19) within 24 hours of surgery. The accuracy of the timing for prophylactic anti-emetics significantly increased (OR: 3.66; P: .003). Anaesthesiologists administered increased numbers of prophylactic anti-emetics (OR: 5.82; P < .001). The improvement of PONV did not decrease during the four-month period after intervention (P: .639). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The CPGT is a valuable service model to continuously improve PONV and optimize prophylaxis administration.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The incorrect or insufficient prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common in practice. A clinical pharmacist-led guidance team (CPGT) was established and included in general surgery teams. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the CPGT on the improvement of PONV and prophylaxis administration. METHODS: A prospective before-after study was conducted on 156 femalepatients undergoing abdominal surgery at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital from December 2016 to December 2017. A total of 82 patients were enrolled in the preintervention period, and 74 patients were included in the post-intervention period. The CPGT established the evidence-based criteria for prophylactic anti-emetic administration and conducted interventions, including a review of medical records, provision of feedback, educational outreach, and dedicated support. Primary outcomes included the incidence of PONV within 24 hours of surgery, administered number of prophylactic anti-emetics, and accuracy of the timing for prophylactic anti-emetics. Outcomes were analysed by logistic regression or multivariable linear regression. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After intervention, patients reported significantly less PONV (33.78% vs 56.10%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; numbers needed to treat [NNT]: 3.47), vomiting (29.73% vs 45.12%; OR: 0.42; NNT: 5.16) and nausea (31.08% vs 56.10%; OR: 0.24; NNT: 3.19) within 24 hours of surgery. The accuracy of the timing for prophylactic anti-emetics significantly increased (OR: 3.66; P: .003). Anaesthesiologists administered increased numbers of prophylactic anti-emetics (OR: 5.82; P < .001). The improvement of PONV did not decrease during the four-month period after intervention (P: .639). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The CPGT is a valuable service model to continuously improve PONV and optimize prophylaxis administration.
Authors: Richard H Parrish; Heather Monk Bodenstab; Dustin Carneal; Ryan M Cassity; William E Dager; Sara J Hyland; Jenna K Lovely; Alyssa Pollock; Tracy M Sparkes; Siu-Fun Wong Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 4.964