| Literature DB >> 32021763 |
Karen M Eny1,2, Nivethika Jeyakumar1,2, David W H Dai3, Jonathon L Maguire4,5,6,7,8, Patricia C Parkin9,6,7,10, Catherine S Birken9,6,7,8,10.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sugar-containing beverages (SCBs) including 100% fruit juice, fruit drinks and soda substantially contribute to total caloric intake in young children. The objective of this study was to examine whether consumption of SCB is associated with cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in preschool children, along with whether 100% fruit juice and sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) is associated with CMR. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: 100% fruit juice; AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; CMR, cardiometabolic risk; CVD, Cardiovascular disease; GEE, Generalized estimating equations; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; SCB, Sugar-containing beverage; SSB, Sugar-sweetened beverage; Sugar-sweetened beverages; TG, triglycerides; Triglycerides; WC, waist circumference; zBMI, Body mass index z-score
Year: 2020 PMID: 32021763 PMCID: PMC6994294 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med Rep ISSN: 2211-3355
Fig. 1Participant Flow Chart *402 children had more than 1 visit with a concurrent SCB and CMR observation, resulting in 2266 observations.
Baseline Characteristics of Participant and Non-Participant Children.
| Variable | Participant | Non-Participant | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | mean ± SD or n (%) | n | mean ± SD or n (%) | |
| Age (months) | 1778 | 50.98 ± 12.10 | 3115 | 46.59 ± 10.45* |
| Sex (Male) | 1778 | 949 (53.40) | 3115 | 1617 (51.90) |
| Birthweight (kg) | 1567 | 3.27 ± 0.66 | 2507 | 3.28 ± 0.65 |
| zBMI (SD units) | 1774 | 0.23 ± 1.01 | 2996 | 0.28 ± 1.05 |
| Average Weekday Free Play (mins/day) | 1694 | 55.98 ± 54.84 | 2571 | 57.34 ± 57.12 |
| Average Screen Time (mins/day) | 1681 | 85.70 ± 76.00 | 2156 | 83.72 ± 78.93 |
| Maternal Ethnicity | 1565 | 2723 | ||
| European | 1085 (69.30) | 1937 (71.10) | ||
| East/Southeast Asian | 170 (10.90) | 303 (11.10) | ||
| South Asian | 131 (8.40) | 197 (7.20) | ||
| Other | 179 (11.40) | 286 (10.50) | ||
| Maternal Education | 1739 | 3032 | ||
| College/ University | 1584 (91.10) | 2741 (90.40) | ||
| High school | 136 (7.80) | 257 (8.50) | ||
| Public School | 19 (1.10) | 34 (1.10) | ||
| Annual Household Income ($, CAD) | 1473 | 2204 | ||
| <$30,000 | 83 (5.60) | 114 (5.20) | ||
| $30,000 to 79,999 | 237 (16.10) | 383 (17.40) | ||
| $80,000 to 149,999 | 436 (29.60) | 689 (31.30) | ||
| ≥$150,000 | 717 (48.70) | 1018 (46.20) | ||
| Parental Cardiometabolic-related disease | 1612 | 264 (16.40) | 2442 | 387 (15.80) |
| SCB Consumption (cups/day) | 1778 | 0.98 ± 1.17 | 2852 | 1.10 ± 1.26* |
| SSB Consumption (cups/day) | 1778 | 0.12 ± 0.50 | 2544 | 0.16 ± 0.59* |
| 100% Fruit Juice (cups/day) | 1778 | 0.86 ± 0.92 | 2810 | 0.97 ± 0.99* |
| Cardiometabolic Risk Score | 1778 | 0.02 ± 1.16 | 153 | 0.06 ± 1.19 |
| Individual CMR Components | 1778 | |||
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 87.92 ± 7.77 | 1983 | 87.18 ± 7.61* | |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 52.64 ± 4.21 | 2816 | 52.35 ± 4.29* | |
| High Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.37 ± 0.33 | 540 | 1.38 ± 0.33 | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.13 ± 0.64 | 542 | 1.10 ± 0.57 | |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.58 ± 0.71 | 547 | 4.60 ± 0.69 | |
Mean ± SD and n (%) are shown. Differences between participants and non-participants were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
*p < 0.05 comparing participants with non-participants.
Linear Regression Analyses for the Association between each additional cup of Sugar-Containing Beverage (SCB) Consumption and Cardiometabolic Risk Outcomes.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Additionally Adjusted for zBMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Cardiometabolic Risk Score | 0.03 (−0.02, 0.07) | 0.27 | 0.05 (−0.0001, 0.09) | 0.05 | 0.03 (−0.01, 0.08) | 0.11 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 0.22 (−0.07, 0.51) | 0.14 | 0.14 (−0.17, 0.46) | 0.37 | 0.12 (−0.18, 0.42) | 0.44 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 0.08 (−0.10, 0.26) | 0.38 | 0.06 (−0.12, 0.25) | 0.51 | −0.01 (−0.15, 0.14) | 0.93 |
| High Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | −0.01 (−0.02, 0.002) | 0.11 | −0.02 (−0.03, −0.01) | 0.01 | −0.02 (−0.03, −0.01) | 0.01 |
| Log (Triglycerides, mmol/L) | 0.02 (−0.0002, 0.04) | 0.05 | 0.02 (0.004, 0.04) | 0.02 | 0.02 (0.002, 0.04) | 0.03 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | −0.02 (−0.05, −0.003) | 0.03 | −0.02 (−0.05, 0.01) | 0.14 | −0.02 (−0.05, 0.01) | 0.12 |
*Values shown for each individual CMR outcome is in the original units, except for triglycerides which was log transformed.
CMR: cardiometabolic risk; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; TG: triglycerides; WC: waist circumference; zBMI: Body mass index z-score
Adjusted for age and sex. (CMR score and SBP were each further adjusted for height; CMR score, HDL-c, log-TG, and glucose were each further adjusted for fasting hours).
Adusted for age, sex, height, birthweight, unstructured free play, screen time, household income, maternal education, maternal ethnicity and parental history of cardiometabolic-related disease. (CMR score, HDL-c, log-TG, and glucose were each further adjusted for fasting hours).
Adjusted for all covariates in Model 2 as well as child’s zBMI.
Linear Regression Analyses for the Association between each additional cup of 100% Fruit Juice and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSB) Consumption separately with Cardiometabolic Risk Outcomes.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Additionally Adjusted for zBMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | |
| 100% Fruit Juice consumption | ||||||
| Cardiometabolic Risk Score | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.08) | 0.48 | 0.04 (−0.02, 0.10) | 0.22 | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.08) | 0.37 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 0.11 (−0.26, 0.48) | 0.56 | 0.09 (−0.30, 0.49) | 0.65 | 0.07 (−0.32, 0.45) | 0.73 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 0.10 (−0.13, 0.32) | 0.40 | 0.03 (−0.20, 0.26) | 0.80 | −0.04 (−0.24, 0.15) | 0.65 |
| High Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.002) | 0.08 | −0.02 (−0.03, −0.003) | 0.02 | −0.02 (−0.03, −0.002) | 0.02 |
| Log (Triglycerides, mmol/L) | 0.02 (−0.003, 0.05) | 0.09 | 0.02 (−0.001, 0.05) | 0.06 | 0.02 (−0.003, 0.05) | 0.08 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | −0.03 (−0.06, −0.0003) | 0.05 | −0.02 (−0.06, 0.01) | 0.16 | −0.03 (−0.06, 0.01) | 0.14 |
| Sugar−Sweetened Beverage (SSB) consumption | ||||||
| Cardiometabolic Risk Score | 0.07 (−0.03, 0.17) | 0.17 | 0.13 (0.03, 0.23) | 0.01 | 0.10 (0.01,0.19) | 0.02 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 0.85 (0.22, 1.48) | 0.01 | 0.47 (−0.20, 1.14) | 0.17 | 0.42 (−0.22, 1.07) | 0.20 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 0.11 (−0.33, 0.55) | 0.63 | 0.25 (−0.16, 0.66) | 0.23 | 0.14 (−0.10, 0.38) | 0.27 |
| High Density Lipoprotein- cholesterol (mmol/L) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.02) | 0.67 | −0.03 (−0.06, −0.001) | 0.04 | −0.03 (−0.06, −0.001) | 0.04 |
| Log (Triglycerides, mmol/L) | 0.03 (−0.01, 0.08) | 0.17 | 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) | 0.08 | 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) | 0.11 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.01) | 0.16 | −0.02 (−0.07, 0.03) | 0.49 | −0.02 (−0.07, 0.03) | 0.44 |
*Values shown for each individual CMR outcome is in the original units, except for triglycerides which was log transformed.
CMR: cardiometabolic risk; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; TG: triglycerides; WC: waist circumference; zBMI: Body mass index z-score
Adjusted for age and sex. (CMR score and SBP were each further adjusted for height; CMR score, HDL-c, TG, and glucose were each further adjusted for fasting hours).
Adusted for age, sex, height, birthweight, unstructured free play, screen time, household income, maternal education, maternal ethnicity and parental history of cardiometabolic-related disease. (CMR score, HDL-c, log-TG, and glucose were each further adjusted for fasting hours).
Adjusted for all covariates in Model 2 as well as child’s zBMI.