| Literature DB >> 32021744 |
Shyam Sundar Krishnan1, Pulak Nigam1, Adarsh Manuel1, Madabushi Chakravarthy Vasudevan1.
Abstract
Background Surgery of posterior fossa including cerebellopontine (CP) angle involves either craniectomy or craniotomy. While there has been precedence of craniotomy in recent practice, the preferred access in resource-strapped centers still remains been craniectomy. Although the latter offers an excellent exposure, it is believed to carry increased risk of postoperative pseudomeningocoele and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak compared with craniotomy. Methods We have suggested a technique by which after standard craniectomy for the posterior fossa surgeries the bony defect is covered by Gelfoam bone sandwich (GBS) technique. We studied this technique over a period of 25.6 years in 1,028 patients. Results and Conclusion We analyze the risk of pseudomeningocoele and CSF leak in our patients using GBS technique and reviewed literature to compare our outcomes with standard craniotomy and craniectomy procedures. © Thieme Medical Publishers.Entities:
Keywords: CSF leak; bone sandwich; craniectomy; posterior fossa; pseudomeningocoele
Year: 2019 PMID: 32021744 PMCID: PMC6997009 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1678602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base ISSN: 2193-634X