Literature DB >> 32021356

Serum Ferritin Independently Predicts the Incidence of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Yun Hong Wu1, Su Yuan Wang1, Ming Xia Li1, Hua He1, Wei Jin Yin1, Yan Hong Guo1, Hui Qin Zhang1, Zeng Mei Sun1, Dan Zhang1, Xi Wang1, Shu Yao Sun1, Shu Xi Tang1, Rong Du1, Cheng Hui Zhang1.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to determine whether serum ferritin (SF) is an independent risk factor of the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and rapid renal function decline (RFD) in male Tibetan patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included 191 male Tibetan patients with T2DM without CKD. Patients were divided into three groups according to the level of SF. The following outcomes were measured: cumulative incidence of chronic kidney disease [i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and/or urinary albumin/creatine ratio (ACR) ≥30 mg/g] and RFD (i.e. decrease in eGFR of ≥25% from baseline or a decline rate of ≥3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 annually).
RESULTS: In total, over a median follow-up period of 23 months, 30 (15.7%) and 89 patients (46.6%) developed CKD and RFD. In multivariable Cox models, a 100 ng/mL increment in SF was associated with a 1.12-fold (95% CI: 1.02-1.24) higher adjusted risk for incidence of CKD. The adjusted-HR of CKD was 1.31 (95% CI: 0.38-4.53) and 2.92 (95% CI: 0.87-9.77) for those in tertile 2 and tertile 3, respectively, compared with the patients in tertile 1. However, SF was not significantly associated with RFD (adjusted-HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.14).
CONCLUSION: Serum ferritin independently predicts the incidence of CKD in male Tibetan patients with T2DM. High levels of serum ferritin may play a role in the pathogenesis leading to the development of CKD in T2DM.
© 2020 Wu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic kidney disease; serum ferritin; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Year:  2020        PMID: 32021356      PMCID: PMC6970239          DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S228335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes        ISSN: 1178-7007            Impact factor:   3.168


Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the global public health problems.1 The China National Survey of CKD from 2007 to 2010 reported an overall CKD prevalence of 10.8%, and approximately 119.5 million individuals in China have CKD.2 The heavy health and socioeconomic burden of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) underlines the importance of early screening for modifiable risk factors of CKD to prevent or delay the deterioration of renal function.3 Diabetes mellitus (DM) is recognized as the major cause of CKD and ESRD.4 Other risk factors include hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity, and hyperuricemia.5–8 Iron is an essential element for crucial biological function, but excessive iron is also potentially harmful to many tissues and organs as it can cause overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via the Fenton reaction that lead to cellular damage.9–11 Serum ferritin (SF) concentration is an indicator of iron storage in humans. Some published studies have reported that SF is associated with the incidence of CKD.12,13 However, most of these studies were either cross-sectional or conducted in general populations with normal SF concentrations. Previously, we found that SF concentration increased in individuals residing in the Tibetan Plateau, which may be caused by hypoxia, erythropoietic demand, and consumption of red meat.14–16 To explore the association between SF and the prevalence of CKD, we performed a cross-sectional study and found an independent association between SF and the prevalence of CKD in male Tibetan patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This retrospective cohort study aimed to longitudinally assess the effect of SF on the incidence of CKD and rapid renal function decline (RFD) among male T2DM patients from the Tibetan Plateau. We hypothesized that SF could independently predict the incidence of CKD and RFD.

Methods

Subjects and Design

This was a retrospective cohort study that included T2DM patients without CKD at baseline. Data were collected from electronic medical records (EMR) in our hospital from 2014 to 2017. The inclusion criteria were: a) age 18 to 79 years; b) no diagnosis of CKD or a history of renal disease; c) a follow-up duration of at least 6 months; and d) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) at baseline visit and follow-up visit were recorded. Patients with tumours, hepatic disease, including increased liver aminotransferase, liver cirrhosis, and viral hepatitis, haematological disease, and a history of alcoholism were excluded from the study. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The need for written informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study. We have confirmed of patient data confidentiality.

Data Collection

Clinical (age, weight, height, diabetes duration, history of hypertension, and blood pressure) and biochemical parameters [fasting blood glucose (FBG), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum creatinine (Cr), uric acid, ACR, and SF] were collected from EMRs. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. Hypertension was defined as a history of hypertension or use of anti-hypertensive agents. Albuminuria was defined as an ACR >30 mg/g. The eGFR was calculated following the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation: 194 × serum Cr −1.094 × age −0.287 (×0.739 if women).2

Renal Outcomes

The primary outcome was the incidence of CKD, i.e., eGFR less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or the presence of albuminuria.17 The secondary outcome was RFD, which was defined as a decrease in eGFR ≥25% from baseline or a rate of decline in eGFR ≥3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year. These values were chosen on the basis of previous studies.18,19 The rate of decline in eGFR was calculated as (initial eGFR – final eGFR)/follow-up year.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) if the distribution is normal, and median (25th, 75th percentile) was used if the data showed skewed distribution. Categorical variables were described as number (percentage). One-way ANOVA or Chi-square test was performed for the comparisons among different groups. The associations between baseline SF and renal outcome were first evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified by serum ferritin tertile. The significance of the differences in cumulative incidence of CKD and RFD was evaluated with the log rank test. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify associations between SF and the renal outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. All analyses were performed using the statistical package R version 3.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Empower (X & Y solutions, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts). A two-tailed P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General Characteristics

In total, 191 patients with a mean age of 51.1 ± 9.4 years were included in this study. The baseline characteristics of all patients are presented by SF tertiles (T1: 118.3–545.1 ng/mL; T2: 551.1–895.1 ng/mL; and T3: 906.4–2992.0 ng/mL) in Table 1. The mean duration of diabetes was 6.7 years. A total of 35.1% of patients had hypertension. Patients in tertile 1 had significantly lower FBG than those in tertiles 2 and 3 (P = 0.038). However, there were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics among three groups, including age, diabetic duration, BMI, prevalence of hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HbA1c, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, uric acid, creatinine, eGFR, and ACR.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects Grouped by Serum Ferritin Tertiles

Serum Ferritin (ng/mL)P-value
Total (n=191)Tertile 1 (118.3–545.1)Tertile 2 (551.1–895.1)Tertile 3 (906.4–2992.0)
Age, years51.1 ± 9.451.9 ± 9.549.1 ± 9.452.3 ± 9.20.103
Diabetic duration, years6.7 ± 4.96.9 ± 5.16.5 ± 5.26.6 ± 4.60.870
BMI, kg/m226.8 ± 4.826.0 ± 3.227.1 ± 6.927.3 ± 3.30.251
Hypertension, n (%)67 (35.1)21 (32.8)18 (28.6)28 (43.8)0.180
SBP, mm Hg123.7 ± 18.0121.1 ± 20.5123.9 ± 16.0126.2 ± 17.20.280
DBP, mm Hg79.0 ± 9.779.2 ± 9.577.8 ± 9.580.0 ± 10.00.428
FBG, mmol/L9.4 ± 4.28.4 ± 3.89.7 ± 4.310.3 ± 4.20.038
HBA1c, %9.6 ± 2.69.4 ± 2.710.2 ± 2.89.3 ± 2.10.124
TC, mmol/L4.6 ± 1.14.4 ± 1.14.7 ± 1.04.7 ± 1.10.104
HDL-C, mmol/L1.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.20.228
LDL-C, mmol/L2.8 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.82.9 ± 0.72.8 ± 0.90.477
Uric acid, µmol/L353.8 ± 76.9342.3 ± 71.4356.8 ± 73.5362.5 ± 84.80.314
Creatinine, µmol/L66.5 ± 10.567.6 ± 10.265.7 ± 9.766.2 ± 11.50.593
eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2120.5 ± 23.5117.8 ± 22.9122.6 ± 21.7121.2 ± 25.80.502
ACR, mg/g6.0 (4.0–13.0)5.0 (4.0–9.0)7.0 (4.0–15.4)6.0 (4.0–13.2)0.171

Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.

Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio.

Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects Grouped by Serum Ferritin Tertiles Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio. Over a median follow-up period of 23 months, 30 patients (15.7%) had CKD. There were no significant differences in the incidence of CKD among the three groups (Table 2). Eighty-nine patients (46.6%) had RFD, and the incidence of RFD was higher in tertiles 2 and 3 than that in tertile 1, but the difference was not significant. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves illustrating the cumulative incidence of CKD and RFD stratified by SF tertile. The cumulative incidence of CKD was lower in tertile 1 than that in tertile 2 and tertile 3. However, the difference was not statistically significant (log rank test: p = 0.066). We also did not observe differences in cumulative incidence of RFD among the three groups (log rank test: P = 0.078).
Table 2

Follow-Up Characteristics of the Study Population

Serum Ferritin (ng/mL)P-value
TotalTertile 1Tertile 2Tertile 3
Follow-up period, months23.0 (14.0–31.5)24.5 (16.0–35.0)22.0 (14.0–26.0)24.0 (14.0–32.5)0.078
Last Cr, µmol/L68.3 ± 12.967.3 ± 11.568.6 ± 14.269.0 ± 13.00.748
Last eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2117.5 ± 27.9117.7 ± 23.2119.3 ± 33.0115.6 ± 27.00.761
Incidence of CKD, n (%)30 (15.7)6 (9.4)12 (19.1)12 (18.8)0.220
Incidence of RFD, n (%)89 (46.6)27 (42.2)29 (46.0)33 (51.6)0.565

Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.

Abbreviations: Cr, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD, chronic kidney disease; RFD, rapid renal function decline.

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CKD (A) and RFD (B) of all patients stratified by serum ferritin tertiles.

Follow-Up Characteristics of the Study Population Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: Cr, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD, chronic kidney disease; RFD, rapid renal function decline. Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CKD (A) and RFD (B) of all patients stratified by serum ferritin tertiles.

Variables in Relation to Renal Outcomes

The unadjusted associations between the clinical variables and incidence of CKD and RFD are presented in Table 3. Our results showed that diabetic duration, ACR, and HbA1c were positively associated with incidence of CKD (P <0.05). eGFR was positively associated with RFD (P <0.05). There were no significant associations between age, BMI, lipid profile and renal outcomes.
Table 3

The Correlations Between Clinical Variables and Renal Outcomes by Univariate Analysis

VariablesCKDRFD
Odds Ratio (95% CI)P-valueOdds Ratio (95% CI)P-value
Age0.99 (0.96, 1.04)0.8490.99 (0.96, 1.02)0.669
Diabetic duration1.09 (1.01, 1.18)0.0280.97 (0.91, 1.02)0.280
BMI1.04 (0.97, 1.11)0.2820.96 (0.90, 1.04)0.309
Hypertension0.91 (0.40, 2.08)0.8270.74 (0.41, 1.35)0.328
SBP1.01 (0.98, 1.03)0.6901.02 (0.10, 1.03)0.070
DBP1.00 (0.96, 1.04)0.9431.01 (0.98, 1.04)0.439
eGFR1.00 (0.98, 1.02)0.9581.06 (1.01, 1.04)<0.001
ACR1.10 (1.05, 1.16)< 0.0010.98 (0.94, 1.02)0.290
Uric acid1.00 (1.00, 1.01)0.9731.00 (0.99, 1.00)0.124
TC1.12 (0.77, 1.63)0.5530.95 (0.73, 1.24)0.703
HDL-C1.45 (0.28, 7.60)0.6580.85 (0.25, 2.90)0.796
LDL-C0.88 (0.54, 1.42)0.5901.03 (0.73, 1.46)0.876
HbA1c1.29 (1.10, 1.51)0.0011.05 (0.93, 1.17)0.436

Note: The data are presented as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value.

Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; RFD, rapid renal function decline; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

The Correlations Between Clinical Variables and Renal Outcomes by Univariate Analysis Note: The data are presented as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value. Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; RFD, rapid renal function decline; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Association Between SF and Renal Outcomes

Table 4 shows the results of Cox regression analysis for the influence of baseline SF level on the incidence of CKD in both the crude model and adjusted model. After adjustment for diabetic duration, SBP, uric acid, HbA1c, ACR and eGFR, a 100 ng/mL increment in SF was associated with a 1.12-fold (95% CI: 1.02–1.24) higher risk for CKD. The adjusted HR of CKD was 1.31 (95% CI: 0.38–4.53) and 2.92 (95% CI: 0.87–9.77) for those in tertile 2 and tertile 3, respectively, compared with the patients in tertile 1, but this difference was not statistically significant. Table 5 shows the association between SF and RFD. SF level was not significantly associated with the risk of RFD after adjusting for other variables (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99–1.14).
Table 4

Cox Regression Analysis of SF and Incidence of CKD

VariablesModel 1Model 2Model 3
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Ferritina1.07 (0.99, 1.16)0.1021.08 (0.99, 1.18)0.0751.12 (1.02, 1.24)0.020
T1RefRefRef
T22.27 (0.80, 6.50)0.1252.28 (0.77, 6.76)0.1371.31 (0.38, 4.53)0.672
T32.23 (0.78, 6.37)0.1342.22 (0.75, 6.58)0.1502.92 (0.87, 9.77)0.082

Notes: The data are presented as hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value. Model 1: non-adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for diabetic duration and SBP. Model 3: adjusted for diabetic duration, SBP, uric acid, eGFR, ACR and HbA1c. a100 ng/mL increment in serum ferritin.

Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Table 5

Cox Regression Analysis of SF and Incidence of RFD

VariablesModel 1Model 2Model 3
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Ferritina1.06 (0.99, 1.11)0.1011.06 (0.99, 1.13)0.1021.06 (0.99, 1.14)0.095
T1RefRefRef
T21.17 (0.58, 2.36)0.6631.09 (0.53, 2.24)0.8091.28 (0.57, 2.90)0.547
T31.46 (0.73, 2.93)0.2891.38 (0.67, 2.81)0.3801.52 (0.69, 3.32)0.295

Notes: The data are presented as hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value. Model 1: non-adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for diabetic duration and SBP. Model 3: adjusted for diabetic duration, SBP, uric acid, eGFR, ACR and HbA1c. a100 ng/mL increment in serum ferritin.

Abbreviations: RFD, rapid renal decline; SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Cox Regression Analysis of SF and Incidence of CKD Notes: The data are presented as hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value. Model 1: non-adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for diabetic duration and SBP. Model 3: adjusted for diabetic duration, SBP, uric acid, eGFR, ACR and HbA1c. a100 ng/mL increment in serum ferritin. Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c. Cox Regression Analysis of SF and Incidence of RFD Notes: The data are presented as hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P-value. Model 1: non-adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for diabetic duration and SBP. Model 3: adjusted for diabetic duration, SBP, uric acid, eGFR, ACR and HbA1c. a100 ng/mL increment in serum ferritin. Abbreviations: RFD, rapid renal decline; SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study to evaluate the association of SF with renal outcomes in T2DM patients without CKD. Most previous studies on the association between SF levels and renal outcomes were cross-sectional or case-control studies that enrolled participants with a normal or moderately elevated SF level, whereas our patients had markedly higher SF levels than those observed in previous studies. We found that SF predicted the incidence of CKD but not RFD. Some published studies have investigated the association between SF and renal outcome. Kang et al12 conducted a large cross-sectional study that included 13,462 participants in Korea. The mean SF level was 130.6 ± 1.9 ng/mL for men and 57.7 ± 0.8 ng/mL for women. Compared with the normal-ferritin group, the adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for CKD of the high-ferritin group were 1.57 (1.01–2.44) in men and 1.06 (0.38–2.96) in women, which suggested that SF was associated with a higher prevalence risk of CKD in men, but not in women in Korea. Chen et al13 found that in community-dwelling Chinese, SF in the highest quartiles was associated with increased risk of CKD, such an association was dependent on confounding factors. When gamma-glutamyl transferase and SF were analysed in combination, the rate of CKD increased. Both of these two studies were conducted in the general Han populations, and the SF level was within the normal range. Our previous data revealed that SF concentration was higher in individuals living in the Tibetan Plateau. Thus, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 1071 male Tibetan patients with T2DM. Similar with the findings of Kang et al, we found an independent association between SF and the prevalence of CKD. This retrospective cohort study aimed to longitudinally assess whether increased SF could be a predictive risk factor for the incidence of CKD, and our result confirmed that SF might be an independent predictive factor of CKD. Iron stores primarily exist in the form of ferritin. The World Health Organization defines the upper limit for normal ferritin value at 200 ng/mL and 150 ng/mL in adult men and women without current infection. In this cohort, only a few patients had normal SF value, and some patients even had SF concentrations higher than 1000 ng/mL after excluding those who had hereditary hemochromatosis, inflammation, malignancy, blood transfusions, and hepatic diseases.20 Iron overload leads to an increased production of ROS, which is associated with bimolecular oxidative damage. If left untreated, sustained iron overloaded can cause progressive iron accumulation in the liver, heart, and pancreas as well as other tissues and organs and lead to a multi-visceral disease.21 The pro-oxidant capacity of iron has been demonstrated in CKD and ESRD patients, and the roles of inflammation and oxidative stress on CKD development and progression have been highlighted.22–24 Predicting the development and progression of kidney disease in T2DM patients is challenging. Radcliffe et al25 reviewed the clinical predictive factors in diabetic kidney disease progression and found that increased HbA1c, SBP, albuminuria, early decline in glomerular filtration rate, long diabetes duration, old age, high uric acid level, presence of concomitant microvascular complications, and positive family history were associated with progression of diabetic kidney disease. In our study, except for SF, long duration of DM and high baseline HbA1c level were predictors for the incidence of CKD. Krolewski et al19 found that SBP was a predictor of incident albuminuria and rapid renal function decline in T2DM patients. By contrast, the baseline blood pressure level was not associated with incidence of CKD in our study. This may possibly be due to the low baseline SBP in our cohort. Specifically, the mean baseline SBP in our cohort was 123 mm Hg, which is lower than the recommended SBP of 130 mm Hg.26 Both LDL-C and CKD are risk factors for cardiovascular disease.27,28 However, in their prospective cohort study, Salinero-Fort et al29 reported that dyslipidaemia is one of the risk factors of CKD. In this study, we found that LDL-C was associated with RFD but not with the incidence of CKD. There are also several limitations in this study. First, this was a retrospective cohort, and thus not all relevant data were available. For example, the smoking and drinking status was not available at baseline and thus this was not analysed. Second, our median follow-up time was only 23 months, and a longer follow-up would be more useful to observe the renal outcomes. We are planning to perform a prospective cohort study with a longer follow-up period of up to 5 years in this study population. This study only enrolled patients from the Tibetan plateau; therefore, the generalizability of the findings might be limited. Further investigation that includes a more diverse ethnic background is needed to obtain a more generalized conclusion on the association between SF and CKD.

Conclusion

This study is the first to show that SF was an independent predictive factor of onset of CKD in male Tibetan patients with T2DM. This result indicates that high levels of SF may play a role in the pathologic pathway leading to the development of CKD in T2DM.
  29 in total

1.  American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017.

Authors:  Payal H Marathe; Helen X Gao; Kelly L Close
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.006

2.  Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Yusuke Tsukamoto; Adeera Levin; Josef Coresh; Jerome Rossert; Dick De Zeeuw; Thomas H Hostetter; Norbert Lameire; Garabed Eknoyan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Systemic iron homeostasis and erythropoiesis.

Authors:  George Papanikolaou; Kostas Pantopoulos
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Hyperuricemia and Progression of CKD in Children and Adolescents: The Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyle E Rodenbach; Michael F Schneider; Susan L Furth; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Mark M Mitsnefes; Donald J Weaver; Bradley A Warady; George J Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Influence of obesity on progression of non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Muftah Othman; Bisher Kawar; A Meguid El Nahas
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2009-07-10

Review 6.  Pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  M E Cooper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Oxidative stress and inflammation, a link between chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Victoria Cachofeiro; Marian Goicochea; Soledad García de Vinuesa; Pilar Oubiña; Vicente Lahera; José Luño
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.545

8.  High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies.

Authors:  D J Gordon; J L Probstfield; R J Garrison; J D Neaton; W P Castelli; J D Knoke; D R Jacobs; S Bangdiwala; H A Tyroler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  P wave dispersion and maximum P wave duration are independently associated with rapid renal function decline.

Authors:  Ho-Ming Su; Wei-Chung Tsai; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Po-Chao Hsu; Wen-Hsien Lee; Ming-Yen Lin; Szu-Chia Chen; Chee-Siong Lee; Wen-Chol Voon; Wen-Ter Lai; Sheng-Hsiung Sheu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Clinical predictive factors in diabetic kidney disease progression.

Authors:  Nicholas J Radcliffe; Jas-Mine Seah; Michele Clarke; Richard J MacIsaac; George Jerums; Elif I Ekinci
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.232

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Relationship of Hyperferritinemia to Metabolism and Chronic Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Xiaojing Shang; Rui Zhang; Xiaolai Wang; Junxin Yao; Xiaoying Zhao; Huanming Li
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.168

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.