Literature DB >> 32021298

Silencing of LncRNA Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 Inhibits the Proliferation and Promotes the Apoptosis of Gastric Cancer Cells Through Regulating microRNA-22-3p-Mediated ErbB3.

Xiaoning Li1,2,3, Jiangqiao Zhao4, Huiqing Zhang5, Jianhui Cai1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the regulatory effects and mechanisms of long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) on gastric cancer (GC) cells.
METHODS: The expression of MALAT1 was detected in GC tissues and two GC cell lines (SGC-7901 and BGC-823). MALAT1 was overexpressed and silenced in GC cells by the transfection of pcDNA-MALAT1 and siRNA-MALAT1, respectively. The proliferation and apoptosis of transfected cells, as well as the tumor volume and weight in mice injected with transfected cells were determined. After identifying the interaction between microRNA-22-3p (miR-22-3p) and MALAT1/epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (ErbB3), the effects of miR-22-3p/ErbB3 silencing on the proliferation and apoptosis of GC cells were evaluated.
RESULTS: MALAT1 was significantly upregulated in GC tissues and cells and negatively associated with the survival of GC patients. Overexpression of MALAT1 significantly promoted the proliferation and inhibited the apoptosis of SGC-7901 cells, while silencing of MALAT1 exerts contrary effects on BGC-823 cells. Silencing of MALAT1 also significantly inhibited the tumor growth in mice. In addition, MALAT1 negatively regulated its target miR-22-3p. Silencing of miR-22-3p reversed the anti-tumor effects of MALAT1 silencing on GC cells. MiR-22-3p negatively regulated its target ErbB3. Silencing of ErbB3 reversed the tumor-promoting effects of miR-22-3p silencing on GC cells.
CONCLUSION: Silencing of MALAT1 inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of GC cells through upregulating miR-22-3p and downregulating ErbB3.
© 2020 Li et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MicroRNA22-3p; epidermal growth factor receptor 3; gastric cancer; long non-coding RNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1

Year:  2020        PMID: 32021298      PMCID: PMC6980870          DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S222375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onco Targets Ther        ISSN: 1178-6930            Impact factor:   4.147


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is a gastrointestinal cancer that occurs in the inside lining of the stomach.1 Surgical resection, as well as chemotherapy, and radiotherapy provide great advantages in the treatment of GC in clinical practice. However, the recurrence, metastasis, and resistance greatly limit the therapeutic outcomes.2 The 5-year overall survival rate is <30% for GC and <10% for metastatic GC worldwide.3 Since molecular-based targeting therapy has become a promising therapeutic strategy for GC,4 novel therapeutic targets against GC are urgently needed to be discovered. Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) play key regulatory roles in diverse cellular processes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, invasion, and migration.5 Increasing pieces of evidence have proved that lncRNAs are associated with the occurrence and development of GC, such as H19,6 HULC,7 LINC00152,8 HOTAIR,9 CCAT2,10 and MEG3.11 LncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) is an oncogene that associated the tumorigenesis and metastasis of GC.12 High plasma MALAT1 is independently related with the poor prognosis of GC patients and is considered as a metastasis biomarker.13 MALAT1 knockdown inhibits the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells through arresting cells in G0/G1 phase.14 Knockdown of MALAT1 markedly reduces the migration, invasion, tumorigenicity, metastasis, and vasculogenic mimicry of BGC823 and SGC7901 cells.15 LncRNAs can modulate the translation and degradation of mRNAs through interacting with microRNAs (miRs).16 Previous studies have proved that the regulatory role of MALAT1 on GC is realized by targeting specific miRs, such as miR-122,13 −1297,17 −124,18 and −23b-3p.19 MiR-22 is a tumor suppressor in GC that positively associated with the outcomes of GC patients.20 Overexpression of miR-22 markedly suppresses the proliferation, invasion, and migration of SGC-7901 cells.21 It is noteworthy that miR-22-3p is the target of MALAT1. Tang et al showed that MALAT1 protects the endothelium against ox-LDL-induced dysfunction via up-regulating miR-22-3p.22 Li et al proved that MALAT1 influences the proliferation and migration of renal cell carcinoma cells by targeting miR-22-3p.23 However, whether the regulatory role of MALAT1 on GC is associated with miR-22 remains unclear. Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase 3 (ErbB3), also known as HER3 is an oncogene that positively associated with the poor survival of GC patients.24 Knockdown of ErbB3 markedly inhibits the proliferation of GC cells and the growth of tumor tissues in mice.25 Previous studies have proved that ErbB3 is a target of miR-22. Ling et al showed that miR-22 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells through post-transcriptional regulation of ErbB3.26 Up-regulation of miR-22 promotes the apoptosis of pancreatic acinar cells by repressing RrbB3 in acute edematous pancreatitis.27 However, research on the regulatory role of miR-22/ErbB3 interaction in GC is limited. Here, the regulatory effects of MALAT1 on the proliferation and apoptosis of GC cells, as well as tumor growth in mice were evaluated. In addition, the potential regulatory mechanisms of MALAT1 relating with miR-22-3p/ErbB3 were determined. Our findings may reveal a novel therapeutic target against GC and open up new insights into the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Tissue Samples

GC patients (N = 37) were collected in our hospital from April 2012 to February 2013. GC was staged in accordance with the UICC/AJCC staging system in 2010. Patients who had undergone preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy were excluded from this study. The clinical parameters of GC patients are shown in Table 1. Histopathologically confirmed GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were collected through surgical resection, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board, and informed consents were obtained.
Table 1

The Clinical Parameters of Patients with Gastric Cancer (GC)

Clinical Parameters
AgeMean ± SD59 ± 10
< 60 (N)14
≥ 60 (N)23
GenderMale (N)24
Female (N)13
Lymph node metastasisN0 (N)9
N1 (N)8
N2 (N)11
N3 (N)9
Distant metastasisM0 (N)33
M1(N)4
Invasion depthT1 (N)11
T2(N)9
T3(N)11
T4 (N)6
TNM stageI (N)12
II (N)4
III (N)14
IV (N)7
Histological typePoorly differentiated, undifferentiated adenocarcinoma27
Tubular adenocarcinoma1
Mucinous adenocarcinoma4
Signet ring cell carcinoma5
The Clinical Parameters of Patients with Gastric Cancer (GC)

Cell Culture

Human GC cell lines, SGC-7901 (moderately differentiation) and BGC-823 (poorly differentiation), as well as a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Cell Transfection

PcDNA-MALAT1, pcDNA negative control (pcDNA-NC), siRNA-MALAT1 (si-MALAT1), siRNA-MALAT1 NC (si-MALAT1 NC), siRNA-ErbB3 (si-ErbB3), and siRNA-ErbB3 NC (si-ErbB3 NC) were purchased from Jima (Shanghai, China). MiR-22-3p mimics, miR-22-3p mimics NC (mimics NC), miR-22-3p inhibitors, and miR-22-3p inhibitors NC (inhibitors NC) were purchased from Ribobio (Guangzhou, China). When reaching 80% confluence, cells were transfected with the above agents for 48 h by using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissues and cells using TRIzol agent, and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR was carried out on ABI PRISM 7300 (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) with specific primers (Table 2). GAPDH and U6 were used as internal controls. The PCR program included 95°C for 10 s, 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 31 s. Relative mRNA expression level was calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Table 2

The Primers Sequences Used in Quantitative Real-Time PCR

PrimersSequences
miR-22-3p F5ʹ-AAGCTGCCAGTTGAAGAACTGTA-3’
miR-22-3p R5ʹ-TTACCTAGCGTATCGTTGAC-3’
MALAT1 F5ʹ-AAAGCAAGGTCTCCCCACAAG-3’
MALAT1 R5ʹ-GGTCTGTGCTAGATCAAAAGGCA-3’
ErbB3 F5ʹ-CAAGATTCCAGTCTGCATTAAAGTC-3’
ErbB3 R5ʹ-CAGCATATGATCTGTCACAGCTTG-3’
GAPDH F5ʹ-AGAAGGCTGG GGCTCATTTG-3’
GAPDH R5ʹ-AGGGGCCATC CACAGTCT TC-3’
U6 F5ʹ-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3’
U6 R5ʹ-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3’
The Primers Sequences Used in Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Dual Luciferase Reporter Gene (DLR) Assay

For detecting the interaction between miR-22-3p and MALAT1, cells were co-transfected with luciferase plasmid pGL3 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) carrying MALAT1-wildtype (MALAT1-WT)/MALAT1-mutant (MALAT1-MUT) (Ribobio) and miR-22-3p mimics/mimics NC by using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). For detecting the interaction between miR-22-3p and ErbB3, cells were co-transfected with pGL3 carrying ErbB3-wildtype (ErbB3-WT)/ErbB3-mutant (ErbB3-MUT) (Ribobio) and miR-22-3p mimics/mimics NC. After 48 h of incubation, the fluorescence was visualized by using Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega) on a Microplate Reader (Invitrogen).

CCK-8 and Cloning Assay

The proliferation of transfected GC cells was detected by CCK-8 and cloning assay. Simply, at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h post-culturing, cells were incubated with CCK-8 solution (Sigma) for 4 h. After 10 min of incubation with DMSO, the OD 450nm was detected by a Microplate Reader (Invitrogen). In addition, cells were cultured for 14 days in 6-well plates. The formed clones were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. Positively stained clones (>50 cells) were counted under a microscope (Olympus, Japan).

Cell Apoptosis Assay

The cell apoptosis was detected by using Annexin V-propidium iodide (PI) kit (keygen, Jiangsu, China). Simply, cells were stained with Annexin V-EGFP and PI for 10 min under darkness. The apoptosis rate was analyzed on a Flow Cytometry.

Western Blot

The proteins were isolated from cells/tissues by RIPA Lysis buffer, separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk for 2 h, and incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-ErbR3 (#12708, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA), -Ki67 (ab16667, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, England), -PCNA (#13110, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), -Bax (#5023, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), -Bcl-2 (#4223, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), and -Cleaved Caspase-3 (#9661, 1:1000, Cell Signaling) overnight at 4°C. β-actin was used as an internal control (ab8227, 1:2000, Abcam). Followed by 1 h of incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (SN134, 1:5000, SunShine, Nanjing, China) at 25°C, the protein bands were visualized using an HRP development kit (Invitrogen).

Establishment of Tumor Model in Mice

A total of 24 mice were purchased from Hfkbio (Beijing, China), and fed at 22°C with free access to water and food. Mice were randomly divided into two groups, including si-MALAT1 and si-MALAT1 NC group (N = 12, each group). SGC-7901 cells transfected with si-MALAT1 or si-MALAT1 NC (100 mL, 1×106 cells/mL) were injected into the right axilla of mice. After injection, the tumor volume was measured every 1 week by vernier caliper. After the injection for 5 weeks, mice were killed by cervical dislocation. The tumor tissues were separated from mice and then weighted by using an analytical balance. All animal assays were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Public Health Service Policy on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Statistical Analyses

Each assay was performed for at least 3 times. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparison was determined by Student’s t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA (> two groups), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (two groups). The correlation between miR-22-3p and MALAT1/ErbB3 was determined by Pearson correlation assay. A P-value < 0.05 represented significantly different.

Results

MALAT1 Was Upregulated in GC Tissues and Cells

MALAT1 expression was first detected in GC tissues. MALAT1 expression was significantly upregulated in GC tissues at the mRNA level when compared with adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.05) (Figure 1A). MALAT1 expression was significantly higher in GC tissues at Ⅲ+Ⅳ stage than in GC tissues at Ⅰ+Ⅱ stage at the mRNA level (P < 0.05) (Figure 1B). The upregulation of MALAT1 in GC tissues was negatively associated with the survival of GC patients (P = 0.0041) (Figure 1C). In addition, MALAT1 expression was significantly upregulated in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells at the mRNA level, when compared with GES-1 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 1D).
Figure 1

The expression of LncRNA MALAT1 in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (B) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC tissues at Ⅲ+Ⅳ and Ⅰ+Ⅱ stage at the mRNA level (N = 37); (C) The relationship between MALAT1 expression and the percent survival of GC patients (N = 37); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level. Each experiment (qRT-PCR) was performed in five replicates. *P < 0.05 vs adjacent tissues; #P < 0.05 vs GES-1.

The expression of LncRNA MALAT1 in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (B) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC tissues at Ⅲ+Ⅳ and Ⅰ+Ⅱ stage at the mRNA level (N = 37); (C) The relationship between MALAT1 expression and the percent survival of GC patients (N = 37); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level. Each experiment (qRT-PCR) was performed in five replicates. *P < 0.05 vs adjacent tissues; #P < 0.05 vs GES-1.

MALAT1 Promoted the Proliferation and Inhibited the Apoptosis of GC Cells

In order to reveal the regulatory roles of MALAT1 on GC cells, MALAT1 was overexpressed and silenced in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells by the transfection of pcDNA-MALAT1 and si-MALAT1, respectively (P < 0.05) (Figure 2A). MALAT1 overexpression significantly increased the OD450 value of SGC-7901 cells at 48 and 72 h post-culturing (P < 0.05) (Figure 2B), as well as the clone numbers of SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 2C). The overexpression of MALAT1 also significantly upregulated two proliferation markers, Ki67 and PCNA in SGC-7901 cells at the protein level (P < 0.05) (Figure 2D). On the contrary, the silencing of MALAT1 significantly decreased the OD450 value, the clone number, as well as the expression Ki67 and PCNA in BGC-823 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 2A–D). Overexpression of MALAT1 also significantly reduced the apoptosis rate of SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 2E), decreased the expression of Cleaved Caspase-3 and Bax, and increased the expression of Bcl-2 in SGC-7901 cells at the protein level (P < 0.05) (Figure 2F). The silencing of MALAT1 exhibited contrary results on BGC-823 cells with the overexpression of MALAT1 (P < 0.05) (Figure 2E and F).
Figure 2

The regulatory effects of LncRNA MALAT1 on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression at the mRNA level; (B) OD450 values; (C) Clone numbers; (D) Relative protein expression of Ki67 and PCNA; (E) Apoptosis rate; (F) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. Black, normal cells without transfection; pcDNA-NC, pcDNA-MALAT1 negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs Black and pcDNA-NC; #P < 0.05 vs Black and si-MALAT1 NC.

The regulatory effects of LncRNA MALAT1 on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression at the mRNA level; (B) OD450 values; (C) Clone numbers; (D) Relative protein expression of Ki67 and PCNA; (E) Apoptosis rate; (F) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. Black, normal cells without transfection; pcDNA-NC, pcDNA-MALAT1 negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs Black and pcDNA-NC; #P < 0.05 vs Black and si-MALAT1 NC.

miR-22-3p Was a Target of MALAT1

A binding site at miR-22-3p was predicated on MALAT1 by StarBase () (Figure 3A). Because miR-22-3p is a tumor suppressor in GC, the regulatory relationship between MALAT1 and miR-22-3p was further analyzed. DLR assay identified that miR-22-3p was a target of MALAT1 (P < 0.05) (Figure 3B). MiR-22-3p expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues at the mRNA level when compared with adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.05) (Figure 3C), and also significantly downregulated in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells at the mRNA level when compared with GES-1 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 3D). In GC tissues, MALAT1 expression was negatively associated with miR-22-3p expression (P < 0.0001) (Figure 3E). In addition, the overexpression and silencing of MALAT1 significantly downregulated and upregulated miR-22-3p in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells, respectively (P < 0.05) (Figure 3F).
Figure 3

Interaction between LncRNA MALAT1 and miR-22-3p. (A) A binding site predicated by StarBase (); (B) A target interaction identified by DLR assay; (C) Relative miR-22-3p expression in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level; (E) Correlation analysis of the relationship between MALAT1 and miR-22-3p in GC tissues (N = 37); (F) Relative miR-22-3p expression in transfected SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. pcDNA-NC, pcDNA-MALAT1 negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (B), adjacent tissues (C), GES-1 (D), and pcDNA-NC (F); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC.

Interaction between LncRNA MALAT1 and miR-22-3p. (A) A binding site predicated by StarBase (); (B) A target interaction identified by DLR assay; (C) Relative miR-22-3p expression in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level; (E) Correlation analysis of the relationship between MALAT1 and miR-22-3p in GC tissues (N = 37); (F) Relative miR-22-3p expression in transfected SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. pcDNA-NC, pcDNA-MALAT1 negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (B), adjacent tissues (C), GES-1 (D), and pcDNA-NC (F); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC.

Silencing of miR-22-3p Reversed the Anti-Tumor Effects of si-MALAT1 on GC Cells

MiR-22-3p was silenced in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells by the transfection of miR-22-3p inhibitors (P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Silencing of miR-22-3p significantly increased the OD450 value and clone number of SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 4B and C). Silencing of miR-22-3p also significantly decreased the apoptosis rate, decreased the expression of Cleaved Caspase-3 and Bax, and increased the expression of Bcl-2 in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 4D and E). Noteworthily, the silencing of miR-22-3p significantly reversed the anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis effects of si-MALAT1 on GC cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 4B–E).
Figure 4

The regulatory effects of miR-22-3p on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression at the mRNA level; (B) OD450 values; (C) Clone numbers; (D) Apoptosis rate; (E) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. Mimics NC, miR-22-3p mimics negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (A), and si-MALAT1 NC + inhibitors NC (B–E); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 + inhibitors NC; &P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC + miR-22-3p inhibitors.

The regulatory effects of miR-22-3p on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. (A) Relative MALAT1 expression at the mRNA level; (B) OD450 values; (C) Clone numbers; (D) Apoptosis rate; (E) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. Mimics NC, miR-22-3p mimics negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control; si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (A), and si-MALAT1 NC + inhibitors NC (B–E); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 + inhibitors NC; &P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC + miR-22-3p inhibitors.

ErbB3 Was a Target of miR-22-3p

A binding site at 3ʹURT of ErbB3 was predicated on miR-22-3p by Target Scan () (Figure 5A). Because ErbB3 is a tumor promoter in GC, the regulatory relationship between miR-22-3p and ErbB3 was further analyzed. DLR assay identified that ErbB3 was a target of miR-22-3p (P < 0.05) (Figure 5B). ErbB3 expression was significantly upregulated in GC tissues when compared with adjacent normal tissues and significantly upregulated in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells when compared with GES-1 cells at the mRNA level (P < 0.05) (Figure 5C and D). In GC tissues, ErbB3 expression was negatively associated with miR-22-3p expression (P = 0.0036), and positively associated with MALAT1 expression (P = 0.0007) (Figure 5E and F). In addition, the silencing of MALAT1 significantly downregulated ErbB3 and p-ErbB3 in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells (P < 0.05). MiR-22-3p overexpression significantly reversed the inhibitory role of si-MALAT1 on the expression of ErbB3 and p-ErbB3 (P < 0.05) (Figure 5G).
Figure 5

Interaction between ErbB3 and miR-22-3p. (A) A binding site predicated by Target Scan (); (B) A target interaction identified by DLR assay; (C) Relative ErbB3 expression in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (D) Relative ErbB3 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level; (E) Correlation analysis of the relationship between ErbB3 and miR-22-3p in GC tissues (N = 37); (F) Correlation analysis of the relationship between ErbB3 and MALAT1 in GC tissues (N = 37); (G) Relative ErbB3 and p-ErbB3 expression in transfected SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (B), adjacent tissues (C), GES-1 (D), and si-MALAT1 NC + inhibitors NC (G); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 + inhibitors NC; &P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC + miR-22-3p inhibitors.

Interaction between ErbB3 and miR-22-3p. (A) A binding site predicated by Target Scan (); (B) A target interaction identified by DLR assay; (C) Relative ErbB3 expression in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level (N = 37); (D) Relative ErbB3 expression in GC cell lines, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 and a normal human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line, GES-1 at the mRNA level; (E) Correlation analysis of the relationship between ErbB3 and miR-22-3p in GC tissues (N = 37); (F) Correlation analysis of the relationship between ErbB3 and MALAT1 in GC tissues (N = 37); (G) Relative ErbB3 and p-ErbB3 expression in transfected SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells. si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs mimics NC (B), adjacent tissues (C), GES-1 (D), and si-MALAT1 NC + inhibitors NC (G); #P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 + inhibitors NC; &P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC + miR-22-3p inhibitors.

Silencing of ErbB3 Reversed the Tumor-Promoting Effects of miR-22-3p Inhibitors on GC Cells

In order to further identify the regulatory roles of ErbB3 on GC cells, ErbB3 was silenced in SGC-7901 cells by the transfection of si-ErbB3. CCK-8 and cloning assay showed that the silencing of ErbB3 significantly decreased the OD450 value and clone number of SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 6A and B). The silencing of ErbB3 also significantly downregulated PCNA and Ki67 in SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 6C). Silencing of miR-22-3p significantly increased the apoptosis rate, upregulated Cleaved Caspase-3 and Bax, and downregulated Bcl-2 in SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 6D and E). Noteworthily, the silencing of miR-22-3p significantly reversed the anti-apoptosis and pro-proliferation effects of miR-22-3p inhibitors on SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 6A–E).
Figure 6

The regulatory effects of ErbB3 on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 cells. (A) OD450 values; (B) Clone numbers; (C) Relative protein expression of Ki67 and PCNA; (D) Apoptosis rate; (E) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. si-ErbB3, siRNA-ErbB3; si-ErbB3 NC, siRNA-ErbB3 negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs inhibitors NC + si-ErbB3 NC; #P < 0.05 vs miR-22-3p inhibitors + si-ErbB3 NC; &P < 0.05 vs inhibitors NC + si-ErbB3.

The regulatory effects of ErbB3 on the proliferation and apoptosis of SGC-7901 cells. (A) OD450 values; (B) Clone numbers; (C) Relative protein expression of Ki67 and PCNA; (D) Apoptosis rate; (E) Relative protein expression of Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2. si-ErbB3, siRNA-ErbB3; si-ErbB3 NC, siRNA-ErbB3 negative control; inhibitors NC, miR-22-3p inhibitors negative control. Each experiment was performed in three replicates. *P < 0.05 vs inhibitors NC + si-ErbB3 NC; #P < 0.05 vs miR-22-3p inhibitors + si-ErbB3 NC; &P < 0.05 vs inhibitors NC + si-ErbB3.

Silencing of MALAT1 Inhibited the Tumor Growth in Mice

The effects of MALAT1 silencing on the tumor growth in vivo were further analyzed. The tumor volume was significantly increased in mice injected with SGC-7901 cells in a time-dependent manner. The tumor volume was significantly lower in mice injected with si-MALAT1-transfected SGC-7901 cells than those injected with si-MALAT1 NC-transfected cells beginning from the second week post-injection (P < 0.05) (Figure 7A and B). Five weeks later, the tumor weight was significantly lower in mice injected with si-MALAT1-transfected SGC-7901 cells than those injected with si-MALAT1 NC-transfected cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 7C). In addition, MALAT1 silencing significantly upregulated miR-22-3p and downregulated MALAT1 and ErbB3 in tumor tissues (P < 0.05) (Figure 7D–F).
Figure 7

The tumor growth in mice injected with SGC-7901 cells. (A) Separated tumor tissue; (B) Tumor volume (N = 10); (C) Tumor weight (N = 10); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5); (E) Relative miR-22-3p expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5); (F) Relative ErbB3 expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5). Each experiment was performed in three replicates. si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. *P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC.

The tumor growth in mice injected with SGC-7901 cells. (A) Separated tumor tissue; (B) Tumor volume (N = 10); (C) Tumor weight (N = 10); (D) Relative MALAT1 expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5); (E) Relative miR-22-3p expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5); (F) Relative ErbB3 expression in tumor tissues at the mRNA level (N = 5). Each experiment was performed in three replicates. si-MALAT1, siRNA-MALAT1; si-MALAT1 NC, siRNA-MALAT1 negative control. *P < 0.05 vs si-MALAT1 NC.

Discussion

GC is a severe gastrointestinal malignancy that accompanied with high mortality.3 In recent years, molecular-based targeting therapy has become a promising therapeutic strategy for GC.28 MALAT1 is an important lncRNA that acts as an oncogene, as well as a therapeutic target in cancer. MALAT1 is upregulated in diverse types of cancers, such as ovarian cancer,29 prostate cancer,30 lung cancer,12 colorectal cancer,31 and GC.13 In consistent with previous studies, MALAT1 expression was significantly upregulated in GC tissues when compared with adjacent normal tissues, and significantly upregulated in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 when compared with GES-1 cells. Previous studies have proved that high plasma MALAT1 is positively associated with poor prognosis, and high MALAT1 expression is positively associated with metastasis, and TNM stage.13,17 Here, MALAT1 expression was significantly upregulated in GC tissues at Ⅲ+Ⅳ stage when compared withⅠ+Ⅱ stage. MALAT1 overexpression was negatively associated with the survival of GC patients. Our findings are just consistent with previous studies, and further indicate that MALAT1 is a potential diagnostic and prognostic factor for GC. A large number of researches have proved that MALAT1 is important in the proliferation and apoptosis of GC cells. For example, MALAT1 knockdown inhibits the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells via blocking cells in G0/G1 phase.14 MALAT1 knockdown inhibits the proliferation ability of MKN45 and MKN28 cells.17 MALAT1 knockdown promotes G0/G1 phase arrest, as well as the apoptosis of MKN45 and CTC141 cells.13 In this study, we found that the silencing of MALAT1 significantly increased the OD450 value, the clone number, Ki67, PCNA and Bcl-2 expression, and decreased the apoptosis rate, and Cleaved Caspase-3 and Bax expression in SGC-7901 cells. Noteworthily, silencing of MALAT1 exhibited contrary results on BGC-823 cells with the overexpression of MALAT1. In consistent with previous studies, these findings indicate silencing of MALAT1 can inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro. A previous study has proved that siRNA-mediated suppression of MALAT1 suppresses the tumor formation and growth in mice.32 Here, MALAT1 silencing significantly reduced the tumor volume and weight in mice, which further illustrate that the MALAT1 silencing exerts great anti-tumor potential on GC. The regulatory effects of MALAT1 on GC are closely associated with the interaction with diverse miRs, such as miR-122-IGF-1R,13 miR-1297,17 and miR-23b-3p.19 In this study, miR-22-3p was identified as a target of MALAT1. MiR-22 is a tumor suppressor that downregulated in diverse cancers, including breast cancer,33 colon cancer,34 liver cancer,35 and GC.21 In consistent with previous studies, miR-22-3p expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues and cells. A previous study has proved that miR-22 overexpression decreased the proliferation ability of SGC-7901 cells, and the tumor growth in mice.21 Similarly, we found that the silencing of miR-22-3p significantly promotes the proliferation, and inhibits the apoptosis of GC cells. Since MALAT1 expression was negatively associated with miR-22-3p expression, miR-22-3p upregulation may contribute to the anti-tumor effects of MALAT1 silencing on GC cells. This hypothesis is further illustrated by that miR-22-3p silencing reversed the anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis effects of si-MALAT1. ErbB3, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family plays an important regulatory role in the growth, chemotherapeutic resistance, and metastasis of cancer.36 In this study, ErbB3 was identified as a target of miR-22-3p, which is just consistent with a previous research that miR-22 downregulated ErbB3 through binding to ErbB3.21 In addition, a previous study has proved that ErbB3 knockdown inhibits the proliferation and promotes the apoptosis of GC cells, and promotes the tumor growth in vivo.25 In consistent with this study, we found that the silencing of ErbB3 significantly inhibits the proliferation, and promotes the apoptosis of GC cells. Since ErbB3 was negatively associated with miR-22 in GC, we suspect that ErbB3 downregulation may contribute to the tumor-promoting effects of miR-22-3p inhibitors on SGC-7901 cells. This hypothesis is further illustrated by that the silencing of ErbB3 significantly reversed the tumor-promoting effects of miR-22-3p inhibitors on SGC-7901 cells. The anti-tumor effects of MALAT1 silencing on GC cells may attribute to miR-22-3p-induced downregulation of ErbB3.

Conclusions

In conclusion, lncRNA MALAT1 expression was upregulated in GC tissues and cells and could be used as a potential diagnostic and prognostic factor for GC. Silencing of MALAT1 inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of GC cells through upregulating miR-22-3p and downregulating ErbB3. Since silencing of MALAT1 also inhibited the tumor growth in mice, it may be a promising therapeutic target for GC. However, the efficacy and safety of MALAT1 silencing in the treatment of GC are still unclear. Further researches in these fields are still needed.
  35 in total

1.  MALAT1 promotes cell proliferation in gastric cancer by recruiting SF2/ASF.

Authors:  Junqing Wang; Liping Su; Xuehua Chen; Pu Li; Qu Cai; Beiqin Yu; Bingya Liu; Weize Wu; Zhenggang Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.529

2.  Expressions of miR-22 and miR-135a in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tao Qin; Qiang Fu; Yan-Feng Pan; Chuan-Jiang Liu; Yu-Zhu Wang; Ming-Xing Hu; Qiang Tang; Hong-Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-08

3.  Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 is upregulated and involved in cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Liqin Wu; Xiaoyu Wang; Yuna Guo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  microRNA-22, downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and correlated with prognosis, suppresses cell proliferation and tumourigenicity.

Authors:  J Zhang; Y Yang; T Yang; Y Liu; A Li; S Fu; M Wu; Z Pan; W Zhou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  High expression of lncRNA MALAT1 suggests a biomarker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Tu Zheng; De-Bing Shi; Yu-Wei Wang; Xin-Xiang Li; Ye Xu; Pratik Tripathi; Wei-Lie Gu; Guo-Xiang Cai; San-Jun Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-05-15

Review 6.  Gastric cancer review.

Authors:  Lauren Peirce Carcas
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2014-12-19

Review 7.  Long noncoding RNAs in gastric cancer: functions and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jiajun Wang; Jingxu Sun; Jun Wang; Yongxi Song; Peng Gao; Jinxin Shi; Ping Chen; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The lncRNA MALAT1 is a novel biomarker for gastric cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Hongwei Xia; Qingjuan Chen; Ying Chen; Xiaojun Ge; Weibing Leng; Qiulin Tang; Ming Ren; Liang Chen; Dandan Yuan; Yucheng Zhang; Ming Liu; Qiyong Gong; Feng Bi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-30

9.  Molecular targeted agents for gastric cancer: a step forward towards personalized therapy.

Authors:  Esther Una Cidon; Sara G Ellis; Yasir Inam; Sola Adeleke; Sara Zarif; Tom Geldart
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Reduced expression of miR-22 in gastric cancer is related to clinicopathologic characteristics or patient prognosis.

Authors:  Weibin Wang; Fujun Li; Yong Zhang; Yanyang Tu; Qi Yang; Xingchun Gao
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.644

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Exosomal long noncoding RNAs - the lead thespian behind the regulation, cause and cure of autophagy-related diseases.

Authors:  Sougata Ghosh Chowdhury; Debalina Bhattacharya; Parimal Karmakar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Association of MALAT1 expression in gastric carcinoma and the significance of its clinicopathologic features in an Iranian patient.

Authors:  Vahid Chaleshi; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mahyar Nourian; Shahrokh Iravani; Hasan Jalaeikhoo; Mohsen Rajaeinejad; Ali Reza Khoshdel; Hamed Naghoosi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2021

3.  Identification of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Gastric Cancer Based on Multiple Level Integration and Global Network Optimization.

Authors:  Lin Cui; Ping Wang; Dandan Ning; Jing Shao; Guiyuan Tan; Dajian Li; Xiaoling Zhong; Wanqi Mi; Chunlong Zhang; Shizhu Jin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-12

4.  The expression and prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in glioma.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Zhengyuan Huo; Hui Huang; Wei Ji; Zheng Bian; Jiantong Jiao; Jun Sun; Junfei Shao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Roles of ncRNAs as ceRNAs in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Junhong Ye; Jifu Li; Ping Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Prognostic and immunological significance of metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 among different kinds of cancers.

Authors:  Lili Guo; Xiuwen Zhang; Hongli Pan; Yang Li; Jing Wang; Lin Li; Yafang Dong; Xinxin Du; Jun Chen; Fengjie Guo
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.