| Literature DB >> 32021200 |
Yi Liu1, Hua Xiong2,3, Xiaojiao Li2,3, Dan Zhang2,3, Chao Yang2,3, Jiayi Yu2,3, Ruikun Liao2,3, Bi Zhou2,3, Xianlong Huang2,3, Zhuoyue Tang2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the baseline brain activity in neuromyelitis optica patients without brain lesion using the regional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) as indexes.Entities:
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; neuromyelitis optica; resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; rs-fMRI
Year: 2020 PMID: 32021200 PMCID: PMC6955618 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S232924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ISSN: 1176-6328 Impact factor: 2.570
The Main Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Subjects
| No. Subjects | Mean (Range) Age, y | Sex (M/F) | Median (Range) EDSS | Median (Range) Disease Duration (Month) | Median (Range, in Spinal Segments) T2 Lesion Load | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMO group | 42 | 35.5 (20–52) | 14/28 | 3.75 (1.0–7.5) | 20.5 (2–70) | 3.9 (0.5–5) |
| Control | 42 | 35.9 (22–53) | 14/28 | — | — | — |
Abbreviation: NMO, neuromyelitis optica.
The Characteristics of Spinal Cord Lesions in NMO Patients
| Characteristics of Lesions | Distribution of Lesions | Affected Segment of Spinal Cord | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical Cord | Thoracic Cord | Lumbosacral Cord | C5-T6 | ≤1 | 1to≤2 | 2to≤3 | ≥3 | |
| No. lesions, n | 26 | 13 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 38 |
| Constituent ratio, % | 61.90 | 31.71 | 7.32 | 92.68 | 0 | 2.38 | 7.14 | 90.48 |
Abbreviation: NMO, neuromyelitis optica.
Figure 1The ALFF values were significantly increased between the NMO group and the control group in the left inferior temporal gyrus, left cerebellum_4_5, bilateral superior temporal pole, left caudate, right superior temporal gyrus, left middle frontal and left superior occipital gyrus. The color bar represents the t values.
Areas Showing Significantly Changed ALFF in NMO Patients
| Anatomic Regions | Brodmann Area | Peak MNI Coordinates (x, y, z)* | Maximum t Score | No. of Voxels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left inferior temporal gyrus | 20 | −48, −3, −36 | 6.7679 | 144 |
| Left cerebellum_4_5 | – | −3, −54, −6 | 7.6619 | 265 |
| Left superior temporal pole | 38 | −51, 18, −21 | 6.0199 | 92 |
| Right superior temporal pole | 38 | 51, 12, −12 | 6.2881 | 92 |
| Left caudate nucleus | 25 | −3, 18, −3 | 7.4806 | 1529 |
| Right superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 45, −12, 0 | 5.0875 | 79 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 10 | −36, 54, 21 | 5.1504 | 76 |
| Left superior occipital gyrus | 19 | −9, −87, 45 | 6.2761 | 95 |
Notes: *x, y, and z are the locations of the peak voxels in standard MNI coordinates. After AlphaSim correction, the cluster size was greater than 40 voxels. The threshold was set at P < 0.01.
Abbreviation: NMO, neuromyelitis optica.
Figure 2The fALFF values were significantly increased between the NMO group and the control group in the right cerebellum crus2, right hippocampus, left parahippocampal gyrus and left supplementary motor area. The color bar represents the t values.
Areas Showing Significantly Changed fALFF in NMO Patients
| Anatomic Regions | Brodmann Area | Peak MNI Coordinates (x, y, z)* | Maximum t Score | No. of Voxels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left inferior temporal gyrus | 20 | −63, −42, −15 | 6.7252 | 1196 |
| Right cerebellum crus2 | – | 54, −54, −42 | 5.4775 | 121 |
| Right hippocampus | 28 | 36, −12, −21 | 6.1086 | 193 |
| Left parahippocampal gyrus | 36 | −21, −30, −18 | 6.1638 | 90 |
| Right middle temporal gyrus | 21 | 54, −27, −3 | 6.6243 | 257 |
| Left supplementary motor area | 6 | −6, −6, 66 | 6.3531 | 103 |
Notes: *x, y, and z are the locations of the peak voxels in standard MNI coordinates. After AlphaSim correction, the cluster size was greater than 40 voxels. The threshold was set at P < 0.01.
Abbreviation: NMO, neuromyelitis optica.
Figure 3The correlations between the EDSS and ALFF/fALFF in left inferior temporal gyrus (ITG_L) in NMO patients. (A) The correlations between the EDSS and ALFF (r = 0.805, P < 0.0001). (B) The correlations between the EDSS and fALFF (r = 0.490, P = 0.001).