| Literature DB >> 32020872 |
Kirtan Joshi1, Alan Parrish2, Elizabeth A Grunz-Borgmann2, Mary Gerkovich3, William R Folk4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A variety of medicinal products prepared from secondary tubers of Harpagophytum procumbens subsp. procumbens (Burch.) DC.ex Meisn. (Devil's Claw) and H. zeyheri are marketed in Africa, Europe, the United States, South America and elsewhere, where they are used for inflammatory and musculoskeletal conditions such as arthritis, lower back pain, rheumatism and neuralgia, etc. While clinical studies conducted over the last twenty years support the general safety of such products, infrequent gastrointestinal disturbances (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), headache, vertigo and hypersensitivity (allergic) reactions (rash, hives and face swelling) have been documented. Sex-related differences occur in the health conditions for which Devil's Claw products are used, so it is likely that usage is similarly sex-related and so might be side effects and potential toxicities. However toxicologic studies of Devil's Claw products have been conducted primarily with male animals. To address this deficit, we report toxicological studies in female and male rats of several H. procumbens (HP) aqueous-alcohol extracts chemically analyzed by UPLC-MS.Entities:
Keywords: Devil’s claw; Harpagophytum procumbens; Inflammation; Musculoskeletal; Rats; Sex-related; Toxicology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32020872 PMCID: PMC7076895 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2789-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1UPLC-DAD-MS analysis of metabolites in aqueous-ethanolic and butanolic extracts of H. procumbens (top two panels, total elution profile); bottom two panels, portion of the gradient (min. 1–15) in which iridoid and phenylethanoid/phenylpropanoid anti-inflammatory metabolites elute. Marked peaks were identified by comparison with commercial analytical standards
One Month Study Histopathology Analysis: Test of Group Differences (n = 46; 22 females, 24 males)
| Control | 2014 HP | 2016 HP | 2016 Butanolic HP | X2 (df) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoring: | None - # (%) Mild - # (%) | None - # (%) Mild - # (%) | None - # (%) Mild - # (%) | None - # (%) Mild - # (%) | ||
| Lung | Inflammation | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Edema | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Liver | Degeneration | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Inflammation | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Necrosis & hemorrhage | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 10 (91) 1 (9) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (92) 1 (8) | 2.10 (3) .55 | |
| Fibrosis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Apoptosis | ** | ** 1 | ** 1 | ** | ** | |
| Kidney | Glomerulonephritis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Tubular degeneration / necrosis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 9 (82) 2 (18) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (92) 1 (8) | 4.12 (3) .25 | |
| Interstitial nephritis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 10 (91) 1 (9) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (92) 1 (8) | 2.10 (3) .55 | |
| Proteinuria | 10 (83) 2 (17) | 6 (55) 5 (45) | 8 (73) 3 (27) | 7 (58) 5 (42) | 2.80 (3) .42 *** | |
| Heart | Inflammation | 9 (75) 3 (25) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 9.09 (3) .03 |
| Necrosis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Fibrosis | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Stomach | Inflammation | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Mucosal erosion / ulceration | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Small Intestine | Inflammation | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Mucosal erosion / ulceration | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
| Large Intestine | Inflammation | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * |
| Mucosal erosion / ulceration | 12 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 11 (100) 0 (0) | 12 (100) 0 (0) | * | |
# Data included in the attached Excel file
* Chi-square test statistic of differences in level of response between groups not computed due to distribution of responses - no variability in level of response
** Liver apoptosis was not recorded for any male animals; only noted as “mild” in 2 female rats; no coding for the other female rats and all the male rats
*** An additional statistical test comparing control and 2014 HP groups. X2 (df) p → 2.25 (1) .13. No significant difference between the two most extreme groups
One Month Study Blood Chemistry Group ANOVA
| Mean (sd) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | F, | Control | 2014 HP | 2016 HP | 2016 Butanolic HP |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 3.38, .03 | 297.92 (61.40) | 248.27 (43.67) * ( | 239.82 (34.52) * ( | 253.42 (48.58) |
| Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) | 15.50, <.001 | 20.67 (3.45) | 20.82 (2.27) | 14.82 (1.72) * ( | 19.00 (1.48) |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) *** | 1.33, .28 | ||||
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 3.28, .03 | 142.00 (2.37) | 143.18 (1.78) ** ( | 140.36 (1.69) ** ( | 141.75 (2.45) |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 11.83, <.001 | 4.82 (0.37) | 5.66 (0.86) | 6.95 (0.65) * ( | 6.53 (1.47) * ( |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 1.34, .27 | ||||
| Bicarbonate (mEq/L) | 1.87, .15 | ||||
| Anion Gap (mEq/L) | 4.42, .009 | 18.00 (1.54) | 20.46 (1.13) * ( | 19.73 (1.79) * ( | 19.67 (2.10) ( |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.09, .97 | ||||
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 0.63, .60 | ||||
| Globulin (g/dL) | 3.53, .023 | 2.77 (0.22) | 2.58 (0.20) | 2.52 (0.19) * ( | 2.62 (0.15) |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 0.06, .98 | ||||
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 3.89, .015 | 7.04 (0.65) | 7.74 (0.66) * ( | 7.87 (0.60) * ( | 7.68 (0.66) |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.06, .98 | ||||
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL)*** | 25.08, <.001 | 0.10 (0.00) | 0.21 (0.05) * ( | 0.23 (0.05) * ( | 0.23 (0.05) * ( |
| ALT (U/L) | 1.29, .29 | ||||
| ALP (U/L) | 1.76, .17 | ||||
| GGT (U/L) | All values were “< 3” – no analyses conducted | ||||
| CK (U/L) **** | 2.75, .06 | 334.58 (143.97) | 467.55 (277.07) | 246.73 (114.43) | 242.42 (265.53) |
| X2, p value (df 3) | Control % Slight Hemolysis | 2014 HP % Slight Hemolysis | 2016 HP % Slight Hemolysis | Butanolic HP % Slight Hemolysis | |
| Hemolysis (Mild to moderate hemolysis may cause false increases in direct bilirubin and AST measurement. Marked hemolysis can adversely affect all chemistry tests.) | 0.32, .96 | 25% | 18% | 18% | 17% |
* Intervention group(s) was significantly (p < .05) different from control group
** Intervention groups were significantly different from each other
***Based on distributional properties of the outcome measure, group differences were also tested using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis Test
Creatinine X2 = 4.04, df 3, p = .257
Total Bilirubin X2 = 30.34, df 3, p < .001
**** Note – when outlier value (Data_id = 34) was excluded from the analysis, F (3, 41) = 1.81, p = .16
One Month Study Blood Chemistry Group by Sex ANOVA
| Measure | GROUP main effect | SEX main effect | GROUP X SEX interaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 4.97, .005 | 17.50, <.001 | 1.05, .38 |
| Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) | 16.15, <.001 | 0.06, .81 | 1.43, .25 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.91, .15 | 30.79, <.001 | 1.22, .31 |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 4.54, .01 | 8.97, .005 | 4.47, .01 * |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 78.88, <.001 | 154.09, <.001 | 31.05, <.001 * |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 1.83, .16 | 21.08, <.001 | 0.03, .99 |
| Bicarbonate (mEq/L) | 3.78, .02 | 33.07, <.001 | 2.36, .09 |
| Anion Gap (mEq/L) | 4.77, .01 | 2.11, .15 | 1.99, .13 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.27, .85 | 190.31, <.001 | 0.38, .77 |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 1.81, .16 | 125.86, <.001 | 1.32, .28 |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 4.42, .01 | 13.13, .001 | 1.90, .15 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 0.14, .94 | 69.77, <.001 | 0.24, .87 |
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 5.00, .005 | 2.31, .14 | 4.24, .01 * |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.03, .99 | 24.10, <.001 | 0.35, .79 |
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 33.00, <.001 | 10.81, .002 | 1.95, .14 |
| ALT (U/L) | 2.98, .04 | 45.48, <.001 | 0.74, .53 |
| ALP (U/L) | 1.86, .15 | 2.04, .16 | 2.61, .07 |
| GGT (U/L) | All values were “< 3” – no analyses conducted | ||
| CK (U/L) | 3.70, .02 | 3.79, .06 | 2.80, .053 |
Overall Model Test - X2 = 9.21, df 7, Binary logistic regression to predict hemolysis. Wald X2 statistic | |||
| Hemolysis (Mild to moderate hemolysis may cause false increases in direct bilirubin and AST measurement. Marked hemolysis can adversely affect all chemistry tests.) | X2 = 1.90, df 3, | X2 = 0.0, df 1, | X2 = 0.1, df 3, |
*Only Sodium, Potassium and Phosphorus are significant for group by sex interactions
One Month Study Blood Chemistry Group ANOVA Tests, separately by Sex
| Sodium | ||||
| Females F = 2.13; df 3, 18; | ||||
| Males F = 11.79, df 3, 20; | ||||
| Measure | Mean (sd) | |||
| Control | 2014 HP | 2016 HP | 2016 Butanolic HP | |
| Female – Sodium (mEq/L) | 141.33 (3.08) | 144.00 (1.58) | 141.60 (1.52) | 143.67 (2.07) |
| Male – Sodium (mEq/L) | 142.67 (1.37) | 142.50 (1.76) | 139.33 (1.03)** | 139.83 (0.41)** |
| Potassium | ||||
| Females F = 15.69; df 3, 18; | ||||
| Males F = 125.07, df 3, 20; | ||||
| Measure | Mean (sd) | |||
| Control | 2014 HP | 2016 HP | 2016 Butanolic HP | |
| Female – Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.85 (0.44) | 4.82 (0.33) | 6.36 (0.35) ** | 5.17 (0.48) |
| Male – Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.78 (0.32) | 6.37 (0.29) ** | 7.43 (0.34) ** | 7.90 (0.24) ** |
| Phosphorus | ||||
| Females F = 5.40; df 3, 18; | ||||
| Males F = 1.68, df 3, 20; | ||||
| Measure | Mean (sd) | |||
| Control | 2014 HP | 2016 HP | 2016 Butanolic HP | |
| Female – Phosphorus (mEq/L) | 6.55 (0.50) | 7.38 (0.65) | 8.18 (0.64) ** | 7.70 (0.92) ** |
| Male – Phosphorus (mEq/L) | 7.53 (0.31) | 8.03 (0.55) | 7.62 (0.45) | 7.65 (0.32) |
**HP group(s) was significantly (p < .05) different from Control Group
One Month Study Blood Chemistry Control and 2014HP group by Sex ANOVA (bold – significant differences)
| Serum measure | GROUP main effect | SEX main effect | GROUP X SEX interaction | Special Notes *Report as |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F, | F, | F, | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 6.27, .02 | 5.47, .03 | 0.89, .36 | Placebo > 2014 HP & Females < Males |
| Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) | 0.04, .84 | .12, .74 | 2.03, .17 | No significant interaction |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.13, .73 | 24.89, <.001 | 0.29, .60 | Females > Males |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 2.07, .17 | 0.01, .93 | 2.65, .12 | No significant interaction |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 27.70, <.001 | 25.14, <.001 | 29.88, <.001 | differences between the groups is different for females and males. Females: Placebo > 2014 HP Males: Placebo < 2014 HP** |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 0.07, .80 | 7.98, .01 | 0.03, .87 | Females > Males |
| Bicarbonate (mEq/L) | 0.90, .36 | 18.27, <.001 | 6.95, .02 | differences between the groups is different for females and males. Females: Placebo < 2014 HP Males: Placebo > 2014 HP |
| Anion Gap (mEq/L) | 18.69, <.001 | 0.23, .64 | 2.83, .11 | Placebo < 2014 HP |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.17, .69 | 77.95, <.001 | 0.51, .49 | Females > Males |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 1.42, .25 | 74.89, <.001 | 0.26, .62 | Females > Males |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 6.40, .02 | 16.81, .001 | 0.03, .87 | Placebo > 2014 HP** & Females > Males |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 0.11, .74 | 45.25, <.001 | 0.91, .35 | Females > Males |
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 9.82, .005 | 14.87, .001 | 0.61, .45 | Placebo < 2014 HP & Females < Males |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.02, .90 | 11.89, .003 | 0.08, .78 | Females < Males |
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 66.58, <.001 | 4.29, .052 | 4.29, .052 | Placebo < 2014 HP** |
| ALT (U/L) | 0.65, .43 | 21.51, <.001 | 0.20, .66 | Females < Males |
| ALP (U/L) | 1.04, .32 | 8.09, .01 | 3.00, .10 | Females < Males |
| GGT (U/L) | All values were “< 3” – no analyses conducted | |||
| CK (U/L) | 4.36, .05 | 6.75, .02 | 8.28, .01 | differences between the groups is different for females and males. Females: Placebo < 2014 HP Males: Placebo > 2014 HP |
| Hemolysis (Mild to moderate hemolysis may cause false increases in direct bilirubin and AST measurement. Marked hemolysis can adversely affect all chemistry tests.) | Overall Model Test - X2 = 9.04, df 3, Binary logistic regression to predict hemolysis. Wald X2 statistic | |||
| X2 = 0.11, df 1, | X2 = 0.0, df 1, | X2 = 0.0, df 1, | ||
**HP group(s) was significantly (p < .05) different from Control Group
Three Month Study Blood Chemistry Males and Females Group by Sex ANOVA (bold – significant differences)
| Serum measure | GROUP main effect | SEX main effect | GROUP X SEX interaction | Special Notes *Report as |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F, | F, | F, | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 2.24, .15 | 18.31, <.001 | 0.56, .46 | Females < Males |
| Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) | 3.72, .07 | 0.28, .60 | 0.03, .86 | No significant interaction |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 9.10, .006 | 14.41, .001 | 0.01, .92 | Placebo < 2014 HP & Females > Males |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 0.07, .80 | 4.79, .04 | 0.93, .35 | Females > Males |
| Potassium (mEq/L) (> 10 values coded as missing data) | 0.003, .96 | 74.43, <.001 | 0.46, .50 | Females < Males |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 0.13, .73 | 11.99, .002 | 1.94, .18 | Females < Males |
| Bicarbonate (mEq/L) | 1.22, .28 | 45.86, <.001 | 0.08, .79 | Females > Males |
| Anion Gap (mEq/L) (missing data coded with group average) | 3.12, .09 | 12.49, .002 | 3.12, .09 | Females < Males |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 1.93, .18 | 98.42, <.001 | 0.52, .48 | Females > Males |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 4.24, .051 | 55.26, <.001 | 0.46, .50 | Females > Males |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.79, .11 | 0.06, .80 | 0.11, .74 | No significant interaction |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 0.00, .99 | 67.10, <.001 | 0.01, .92 | Females > Males |
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 0.26, .61 | 1.70, .21 | 4.81, .04 | Differences between groups for females and males. Females: Placebo > 2014 HP Males: Placebo < 2014 HP |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) (outlier coded with group average) | 2.55, .12 | 42.63, <.001 | 2.95, .10 | Females < Males |
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 17.62, <.001 | 6.51, .02 | 4.94, .04 | Significant main effects and interaction. Significant differences between females and males. For both females and males, Placebo < 2014 HP. This difference was much greater for females than it was for males. (With a significant interaction, do not interpret either significant main effect.) |
| ALT (U/L) | 0.86, .36 | 2.75, .11 | 1.16, .29 | No significant interaction |
| ALP (U/L) | 1.38, .25 | 0.80, .38 | 1.69, .21 | No significant interaction |
| GGT (U/L) | All values were “< 3” – no analyses conducted | |||
| CK (U/L) (outlier value coded with group average) | 0.34, .57 | 5.60, .03 | 0.47, .50 | Females > Males |
| Hemolysis (Mild to moderate hemolysis may cause false increases in direct bilirubin and AST measurement. Marked hemolysis can adversely affect all chemistry tests.) | Overall Model Test - X2 = 9.82, df 3, | The occurrence of hemolysis varied with group and sex. Female rats showed more hemolysis (only 1 male in 3-month data showed slight hemolysis). Hemolysis occurred at a slightly higher rate in the control group (50% of the female rats) compared to the HP group (37.5% of the female rats). | ||
| X2 = 0.00, df 1, | X2 = 0.0, df 1, | X2 = 0.0, df 1, | ||
| NOTE - Total Protein: | ||||