Achieving Submicrosecond Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Lifetime and Highly Efficient Electroluminescence by Fine-Tuning of the Phenoxazine-Pyrimidine Structure.

Thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials, combining high fluorescence quantum efficiency and short delayed emission lifetime, are highly desirable for application in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) with negligible external quantum efficiency (EQE) roll-off. Here, we present the pathway for shortening the TADF lifetime of highly emissive 4,6-bis[4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidine derivatives. Tiny manipulation of the molecular structure with methyl groups was applied to tune the singlet-triplet energy-level scheme and the corresponding coupling strengths, enabling the boost of the reverse intersystem crossing (rISC) rate (from 0.7 to 6.5) × 106 s-1 and shorten the TADF lifetime down to only 800 ns in toluene solutions. An almost identical TADF lifetime of roughly 860 ns was attained also in solid films for the compound with the most rapid TADF decay in toluene despite the presence of inevitable conformational disorder. Concomitantly, the boost of fluorescence quantum efficiency to near unity was achieved in solid films due to the weakened nonradiative decay. Exceptional EQE peak values of 26.3-29.1% together with adjustable emission wavelength in the range of 502-536 nm were achieved in TADF OLEDs. Reduction of EQE roll-off was demonstrated by lowering the TADF lifetime.

Introduction

Thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) is an elegant way to employ the “dark” triplet states in organic light-emitting diode (OLED) devices and to achieve nearly 100% internal quantum efficiency[1,2] without the usage of expensive and rare heavy metals, for example, iridium.[3,4] The recent progress in design of TADF materials[5−7] and understanding the processes behind the reverse intersystem crossing (rISC)[8−15] led to the realization of green and sky-blue TADF OLEDs with external quantum efficiency (EQE) values approaching 40%.[16,17] However, large EQE values usually are demonstrated only at low luminance, and pronounced EQE roll-off at larger luminance usually is observed due to the emergence of triplet–triplet, singlet–triplet, and similar annihilation pathways.[18,19] Boosting the rISC rate has been shown to be the successful strategy for lowering the EQE roll-off;[19−21] however, shortening the TADF lifetime is rather a difficult task,[22,23] requiring the minimization of energy gaps between the coupled singlet and triplet states.[8,23] This is achieved by selecting the appropriate electron-donating (D) and electron-accepting (A) units and bounding them in an appropriate molecular geometry.[21] Among the wide variety of possible donor fragments, phenoxazine (PXZ) was shown to be a good candidate for achieving the short TADF lifetime together with a high fluorescence quantum yield[24−32] due to the strong enough electron-donating properties and ability to show large steric hindrance to acceptor units.[21,33] However, being noncontinuously conjugated, phenoxazine is found in two forms, planar and crooked conformation, and only the planar form shows strong TADF.[34,35] This issue can be solved by weakening the interaction between the phenoxazine and the electron-accepting part of the TADF molecule by introducing the spacer unit, minimizing the population of crooked conformations, and enhancing the number of TADF-active planar orientations.[28,36] The application of such molecular design by using phenoxazine D and suitable pyrimidine (PYR) electron-acceptor (A) together with phenyl spacer units (s) in a D-s-A-s-D layout allowed to achieve highly efficient single-band fluorescence with a TADF lifetime of 2.56 μs together with an EQE value of 19.9%.[24] The later modification of a promising phenoxazine–pyrimidine structure by different aryl and methyl moieties at the pyrimidine unit resulted in subsequent lowering of the TADF decay time down to 1.99 μs while preserving a high emission yield.[24,25] Further substantial shortening of the TADF lifetime down to 1.32 μs for the analogous phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds was achieved by introducing Cl or Br atoms and enhancing both ISC and rISC rates due to internal heavy-atom effect, simultaneously preserving a high fluorescence quantum yield. This strategy also allowed to increase peak EQE values up to 25.3%.[26] However, boosting the rISC rate by halogenation results in the redshift of the emission wavelength,[26,37,38] which is beneficiary while seeking the green-to-yellow emission, however other approaches are needed for blue TADF.

Inspired by the potential of pyrimidine–phenoxazine TADF compounds for achieving rapid and highly efficient TADF, we performed the further modification of the 4,6-bis[4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidine molecular structure aiming the additional shortening of the TADF lifetime. Tiny alteration of the molecular structure was performed by inserting methyl units at the different positions of the phenylpyrimidine fragment, changing the geometry and rigidity of the molecular structure. The comprehensive analysis of time-resolved fluorescence spectra revealed the remarkable impact of methyl substitution pattern to energy-level alignment and fluorescence decay rate constants. An optimum molecular geometry was revealed with a balanced ratio between the singlet–triplet energy splittings and corresponding coupling strengths, showing the submicrosecond solid-state TADF lifetime and high emission yield. The optimized TADF compounds were employed in optimized OLED devices as emitters with tunable emission color. Outstanding peak EQE values of 26.3–29.1% were obtained with minimized EQE roll-off.

Experimental Section

Reagents and solvents were purchased directly from commercial suppliers; solvents were purified by known procedures. Melting points were determined in open capillaries with a digital melting point IA9100 series apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and were not corrected. Thin layer chromatography was performed using TLC aluminum sheets with silica gel (Merck 60 F254). Visualization was accomplished by UV light. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm) (Merck). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend 400 (400 and 100 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively). 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were referenced to residual solvent peaks. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses were carried out on microTOF-Q II or microTOF-Q III mass spectrometers (Bruker). DSC curves were measured by Mettler Toledo DSC1 apparatus using aluminum crucibles under N2 flow. Sample mass was around 8–10 mg, and heating and cooling rates were 10 K/min. TADF compounds were analyzed in 1 × 10–5 M toluene solutions, 1 wt % PMMA, and 10 wt % DPEPO films. Solid-state films were prepared by dissolving each material and host at appropriate ratios in toluene solutions and then wet-casting the solutions on quartz substrates. Absorption spectra were measured using a Lambda 950 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer). Time-integrated fluorescence spectra (TIFL), time-resolved fluorescence spectra (TRFL), phosphorescence spectra and fluorescence decay transients were measured using a nanosecond YAG:Nd3+ laser NT 242 (Ekspla, τ = 7 ns, pulse energy 200 μJ, λex = 300 nm, repetition rate = 1 kHz) and time-gated iCCD camera New iStar DH340T (Andor). Fluorescence transients were obtained by exponentially increasing delay and integration time. This allows to record up to 10 orders of magnitude in time and intensity of the fluorescence decay.[39] Fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) within the ±5% error of the solutions and polymer films in ambient air were estimated by the integrated sphere method[40] using an integrating sphere (Sphere Optics) connected to the CCD spectrometer PMA-12 (Hamamatsu) via optical fiber. Solid-state samples were mounted in a closed-cycle He cryostat (Cryo Industries 204 N) for all measurements (for oxygen-saturated (+O2) and oxygen-free (−O2) conditions). Toluene solutions were degassed by using the freeze–pump–thaw method. OLED devices were fabricated on precleaned indium-tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates. The small-molecule and cathode layers were thermally evaporated using a vacuum evaporation apparatus (Vacuum Systems and Technologies Ltd) at <6 × 10–6 Torr pressure and deposition rate of about 1 Å/s. OLED devices were encapsulated with a clear glass cover to prevent the interaction with ambient atmosphere. Device current–voltage (I–V) characteristics and electroluminescence properties were measured using a calibrated integrating sphere (Orb Optronics) and CCD spectrometer PMA-11 (Hamamatsu), powered by a 2601A power supply unit (Keithley).

Results and Discussion

Molecular Design

Four TADF compounds, bearing phenoxazine electron-donor and diphenylpyrimidine electron-acceptor units, were synthesized and comprehensively analyzed. 4,6-Bis[4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidine (PXZ-PYR) was taken as a starting point for further optimization due to the high solid-state fluorescence efficiency (0.88) and rapid TADF decay (2.56 μs).[24] Various modifications of the PXZ-PYR structure were demonstrated,[24,26] seeking for the shortening of the TADF lifetime; however, either the effect was rather low (from 2.56 to 1.99 μs24) or the modification resulted in usually unwanted narrowing of the bandgap.[26] As a solution, molecular structure modification of similar D-s-A-s-D TADF compounds bearing acridine donor units by methyl units for the minimization of τTADF without the emission redshift was suggested by Komatsu et al.[41] The presented strategy allowed  to widen the energy gap and observe the blueshift of the emission peak. Such a strategy was also successfully applied for different TADF compounds.[42−46] Inspired by such observations and our previous findings,[37] we designed three new phenoxazine–pyrimidine TADF compounds with methyl units introduced into the acceptor unit. In contrast to Komatsu et al.,[41] we tuned the twist angles not only between the pyrimidine and phenyl units but also between the phenyl units and phenoxazine, seeking for more pronounced alteration of TADF properties and a molecular rigidity increase. Namely, compound PXZ-muPYR was modified with meta-methyl units, PXZ-mdPYR by ortho-methyl moieties, and PXZ-2mPYR by both meta- and ortho-methyl units at the phenyl spacers (see Scheme ).

Scheme 1

Synthesis of 4,6-Bis[4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidines PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR

Reagents and conditions: (i) boronic ester 1a or 1b (2.2 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), aq. K2CO3 (15 equiv), glyme, 80 °C, 24 h; (ii) boronic acid 2 (2.5 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %), PPh3 (20 mol %), aq. Na2CO3 (6.2 equiv), glyme, 90 °C, 24 h; (iii) phenoxazine (2.2 equiv), Pd2dba3 (5 mol %), P(t-Bu)3·HBF4 (10 mol %), NaOt-Bu (3 equiv), toluene, Ar, 110 °C, 24 h.

Synthesis and Thermal Properties

Synthetic routes of the designed molecules PXZ-PYR, PXZ-mdPYR, PXZ-muPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR are outlined in Scheme . 4,6-Bis[4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidine (PXZ-PYR)[24] and 4,6-bis[3-methyl-4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenyl]pyrimidine (PXZ-muPYR) were synthesized by the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction of 4,6-dichloropyrimidine (3) with corresponding 4-(10-pheoxazinyl)phenyl boronates (1a,b) in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 as a catalyst. Coupling of boronic acid 2 with 4,6-dichloropyrimidine (3) using Pd(OAc)2/PPh3 as a catalyst system gave PXZ-mdPYR in a good yield (81%). Compound PXZ-2mPYR bearing two methyl groups in a phenyl spacer between pyrimidine and phenoxazine moieties was obtained in an excellent yield (95%) by reacting 4,6-bis(4-bromo-2,5-dimethylphenyl)pyrimidine (4), previously reported by us,[37] with phenoxazine under the palladium-catalyzed amination reaction conditions. For clarity, methyl groups in the phenyl spacer will be hereinafter referred to as follows: 2-methyl group in compounds PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR as ortho-methyl group and 3-methyl group in PXZ-muPYR and 5-methyl group in PXZ-2mPYR as meta-methyl groups. The synthetic details and characterization data of the synthesized 4-(10-phenoxazinyl)phenylboronic acid esters 1a,b, boronic acid 2, and target compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-muPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR are presented in the Supporting Information.

Differential scanning calorimetry analysis (see Figure S21 in the Supporting Information) revealed that all phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds were molecular glasses with glass transition temperatures ranging from 109 to 137 °C, typically for similar phenoxazine–pyrimidine TADF materials.[24,26]

DFT Simulations

Quantum chemical calculations were performed by using density functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the Gaussian 09 software package at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level.[47] Polarizable continuum model (PCM) was used to estimate the solvation behavior of the toluene surrounding.

The synthesized phenoxazine–pyrimidine TADF compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR were optimized at the ground-state molecular geometry and π-electron density distribution in the HOMO and LUMO, and S0 → S1/T1 transition energies with corresponding oscillator strengths were calculated (see Figure ). DFT analysis revealed that the lowest-energy molecular conformations were those with a planar (quasi-equatorial) orientation of the PXZ unit[28,34] (see Figure S22 in the Supporting Information for the detailed analysis). The phenoxazine fragment was nearly perpendicular in all compounds with minor variations of the twist angle (angle α1 in Figure ). The modification of the molecular structure with ortho-methyl groups had a pronounced effect on the twist angle between phenyl and pyrimidine units (angle α2 in Figure ). Both phenyls were weakly twisted with respect to the pyrimidine fragment in PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR; however, α2 angle increased from about 19° to nearly 43° after the introduction of the ortho-methyl group due to the enhanced steric hindrance. It had an evident effect on the energies of LUMO, which increased from about −2.04 to −2.10 eV for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR, respectively, and from −1.82 to −1.88 eV for compounds PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR, respectively, weakening the electron-accepting ability and enlarging the bandgap, while the HOMO energies were almost the same (from −4.76 to −4.79 eV). All phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds showed charge-transfer (CT) character when the electron density in the HOMO mostly was distributed over the phenoxazine unit, while in the LUMO, the π-electron density was localized over the diphenylpyrimidine moiety. Molecular structure modification also had the pronounced effect on singlet and triplet transition energies and the corresponding oscillator strengths. S0 → S1 transition energies ranged at 2.224–2.298 eV for PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR with an oscillator strength of 0.0013–0.0016. The enlarged S0 → S1 transition energies up to about 2.495 eV with an oscillator strength of 0.0002–0.0003 were observed for ortho-methyl modified compounds PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR with the lowest electron cloud overlap in the HOMO and LUMO and the weakest electron-acceptor. The same trend was also estimated for S0 → T1 transition, when the transition energies of <2.3 eV were estimated for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR and >2.4 eV for PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR with corresponding singlet–triplet gaps of only 5–6 meV. Such a negligible splitting shows the possibility of highly efficient TADF with controllable emission properties.

Figure 1

(a) DFT-optimized molecular geometries of TADF compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR. α1 and α2 are dihedral angles between phenyl–phenoxazine and phenyl–pyrimidine units, respectively. (b) HOMO and LUMO energies, S0 → S1/T1 absorption energies with corresponding transition oscillator strengths and S1 – T1 energy gaps (ΔEST) and π-electron density distribution in the HOMO and LUMO of compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR.

Absorption and Emission Properties

The impact of molecular core modifications for absorption and fluorescence properties of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds was revealed by analyzing absorption and emission spectra in toluene solutions (see Figure and Table ).

Figure 2

Absorption and fluorescence spectra of compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR in toluene. Absorption spectra of diphenylpyrimidine A and phenoxazine D units are also shown.

Table 1

Absorption and Emission Data of Compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR in Toluene Solutions

compounds	λABS (nm)a	ε (M–1 cm–1)b	λFL (nm)c	ΦFd	kFL (×107 s–1)e	kr (×106 s–1)f	knr (×107 s–1)g
PXZ-PYR	402	3880	543	0.15	7.5	11.3	6.4
PXZ-muPYR	401	2880	530	0.1	6.1	6.1	5.5
PXZ-mdPYR	375	3100	528	0.14	4.0	5.6	3.4
PXZ-2mPYR	-*	below 2000*	519	0.1	4.2	4.2	3.8

Peak wavelength of the lowest energy absorption band. *, no clear absorption peak.

Molar absorption coefficient of the lowest energy absorption band. *, approximate value.

Peak wavelength of the fluorescence spectrum.

Fluorescence quantum yield.

Fluorescence decay rate.

Radiative fluorescence decay rate (kFL × ΦFL).

Nonradiative fluorescence decay rate (kFL × (1 – ΦFL)).

Two regions can be discerned in the absorption spectra, peaking at about 300–320 and 380–400 nm (with absorption tail until about 500 nm). The absorption peaks at the higher energies were the composition of the absorption of individual phenoxazine and phenylpyrimidine units. Since no absorption of donor or acceptor units extended beyond ∼375 nm, the lower energy absorption band was attributed to the absorption of charge-transfer states.[24,26,28] Larger molar absorption values (up to about 3900 M–1 cm–1) were observed for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR, in line with DFT predictions. Fluorescence spectra of compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR peaked at 519–543 nm in toluene solutions, typically for phenoxazine-based TADF compounds.[24−29] The introduction of methyl groups into the phenyl spacer unit allowed us to tune the CT emission wavelength for 100 meV when the fluorescence of the unmodified PXZ-PYR peaked at 543 nm and blueshifted up to 519 nm for PXZ-2mPYR. This was achieved by the manipulating the electron density overlap in the HOMO and LUMO and the strength of donor unit, as shown by DFT calculations. Fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) of TADF compounds in toluene solutions ranged from 0.1 to 0.15 and were larger for compounds without the meta-methyl fragments (see Table ).

To reveal the nature of ΦF variation, radiative (kr) and nonradiative (knr) fluorescence decay rates of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds were estimated (see Table ). Compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR with the largest oscillator strength showed the most rapid radiative decay; however, kr was almost twice lower for PXZ-muPYR, resulting in ΦF decrease. Simultaneously, both PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR with the most flexible molecular structure showed the fastest nonradiative decay due to the pronounced excited-state relaxation (and/or, probably, different ISC rates), though the introduction of the meta-methyl unit lowered the nonradiative decay for about 17%. The further modification of the molecular structure with ortho-methyl units weakened the HOMO–LUMO overlap and lowered the radiative decay rate. Despite that, compounds PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR benefited from the more rigid molecular structure, leading to about 60% lowered nonradiative decay rate.[48,49] The weaker nonradiative decay, despite the lowered radiative decay rate, resulted in enhanced ΦF for compound PXZ-mdPYR, almost the same as for PXZ-PYR with the largest kr.

The nonradiative decay was further suppressed by embedding phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds in solid polymer films. In this case, the emission peaked at 498–513 nm, slightly blueshifted with respect to toluene solutions due to weaker solid-state solvation in the PMMA surrounding[50] (see Figure S23 in the Supporting Information). Same as in toluene, unmodified PXZ-PYR peaked at the longest wavelengths, while compounds modified with ortho-methyl units peaked at the shortest wavelengths. Fluorescence quantum yields of compounds in PMMA films were enhanced due to the largely minimized nonradiative decay. ΦF were 0.26, 0.16, 0.19, and 0.13 for PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR, respectively (see Figure S24 in the Supporting Information for the estimation of ΦF for polymer films). A more pronounced increase in ΦF was estimated for less rigid compounds.

Phosphorescence (PH) properties of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds were investigated by analyzing low-temperature spectra of 1 wt % PMMA films (see Figure ). Clear vibronic progression was observed, typically for localized-excited state (3LE) emission. Vibronic bands of more rigid compounds PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR peaked at the same wavelengths as that of the phenoxazine donor fragment, and the intensity of the 0th vibronic band was the largest for the most rigid PXZ-2mPYR, indicating negligible reorganization of the molecular structure in the excited state. On the other hand, those strongly overlapped and broadened lower energy vibronic bands clearly dominated in the phosphorescence spectrum of the least sterically constrained PXZ-PYR, though the weak 0th vibronic band still was visible. Therefore, all phosphorescence spectra originate from the phenoxazine electron-donor unit with the same T1 energy of 2.72 eV. These results contradicts with other reports of similar D-s-A-s-D phenoxazine–pyrimidine materials and even the report of same compound PXZ-PYR(24) when the T1 states were shown to be at the lower energies.[24−26] The estimated singlet–triplet energy gaps of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds in PMMA films (calculated by subtracting the energy of phosphorescence’s 0th vibronic peak from the onset energy of fluorescence spectra) were in the range of 10–150 meV (10, 70, 150, and 130 meV for PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR, respectively; see Figure S25 in the Supporting Information). The lowest ΔEST was estimated for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR, while the compounds with the lowered HOMO–LUMO overlap showed enlarged ΔEST.

Figure 3

Normalized emission spectra of 1 wt % PMMA films of compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR and the phenoxazine (PXZ) donor unit at 10 K. Spectra were obtained after 100 μs delay with 890 μs integration time.

To sum up, the introduction of methyl groups to the bridging phenyl unit enabled the significant reduction of knr; however, it also decreased kr and enlarged the singlet–triplet energy gaps. Later, it will be shown to have the crucial impact to TADF properties.

TADF Properties

In this section, solution and solid-state TADF properties of phenoxazine–phenylpyrimidine compounds will be discussed. All materials showed delayed fluorescence of TADF nature in both toluene solutions and PMMA films, as demonstrated by its temperature activation (see Figure S26 in the Supporting Information) and quenching by molecular oxygen (see Figures S27 and S28 in the Supporting Information). The fluorescence intensity of toluene solutions was strongly enhanced upon the oxygen removal for compounds PXZ-muPYR and PXZ-2mPYR (for 5.2–5.3 times), while for PXZ-PYR and PXZ-mdPYR, the enhancement was lower (for 2.7–2.8 times). Although ΦF was rather similar for all compounds in −O2 toluene (0.38–0.53), fluorescence quantum yields of delayed fluorescence (ΦDF) were markedly larger for PXZ-muPYR and PXZ-2mPYR than those for PXZ-PYR and PXZ-mdPYR (∼0.42 vs ∼0.25), together with remarkably enhanced DF/PF ratios (∼4.3 vs ∼1.8).

The TADF lifetime of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds in toluene solutions (see Figure a and Table ) was rather fast for compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR with the lifetime ranging from 1.6 to 4.0 μs, while for PXZ-muPYR, the TADF decay time decreased down to 0.8 μs. This value was among the lowest reported for solutions,[20,22,28,38,51] though the low TADF lifetime in solutions with ΦF of only ∼0.5 could also be affected by the nonradiative fluorescence recombination.[52] Clearly, the molecular structure had a direct effect on TADF properties, altering the rates of ISC and rISC in toluene solutions (see Table ). According to Gibson et al.,[8] efficient ISC and rISC require the combination of large spin-orbit coupling between 1CT and 3LE states and large vibronic coupling between 3LE and 3CT states (via the torsion of D-A angle), together with small corresponding energy gaps (1CT-3LE and 3LE-3CT, respectively).

Figure 4

Normalized fluorescence decay transients of phenoxazine–pyrimidine TADF compounds in (a) −O2 toluene and (b) 10 wt % DPEPO films. Color lines are biexponential fits, while the black line in (b) is a triexponential fit.

Table 2

TADF Properties of Compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR in −O2 Toluenea

compounds	ΦFb		ΦISCd	τPF (ns)e	τTADF (μs)f	kIC (106 s–1)g	kISC (107 s–1)h	krISC (106 s–1)i
PXZ-PYR	0.15/0.27/0.42	1.8	0.64	13.3	1.6	16.0	4.8	1.8
PXZ-muPYR	0.1/0.42/0.52	4.2	0.81	16.4	0.8	5.6	4.9	6.5
PXZ-mdPYR	0.14/0.24/0.38	1.7	0.63	25.0	4.0	9.2	2.5	0.7
PXZ-2mPYR	0.1/0.43/0.53	4.3	0.81	23.8	2.1	3.7	3.4	2.5

Calculations were carried out according to Dias et.al.[55]

Fluorescence quantum yield of prompt, delayed, and total fluorescence, respectively.

Delayed fluorescence/prompt fluorescence intensity ratio.

Triplet yield. It was estimated according to ref (53) using PH lifetime from Figure S29 in the Supporting Information.

Fluorescence decay time.

TADF decay time.

Internal conversion rate.

Intersystem crossing rate.

Reverse intersystem crossing rate. Alike krISC values, we also obtained accordingly to the model for compounds with kr ≈ krISC; see Table S1 in the Supporting Information.

In our case, we obviously tune the rotational flexibility of PXZ unit and alter the 1CT-3LE gap by changing the HOMO–LUMO overlap. Likewise, 3LE-3CT gaps may also be different, while the spin-orbit coupling constants should be similar for compounds with a similar molecular structure.[53] All this resulted in changes of the ISC rate  (from 4.8 to 4.9) × 107 s–1 for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR, respectively, and  (from 2.5 to 3.4) × 107 s–1 for PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR, respectively, together with more pronounced variation of the rISC rate from 6.5 × 106 s–1 (for PXZ-muPYR) to 0.7 × 106 s–1 (PXZ-mdPYR). Both rates were clearly lower for compounds with larger 1CT-3LE splittings but the same rotational flexibility of PXZ unit (e.g., PXZ-PYR vs PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-muPYR vs PXZ-2mPYR). Here, the decrease in ISC and rISC rates mostly was caused by the enhancement of 1CT-3LE gaps. Surprisingly, the increase in both rates was found for compounds with more sterically constrained PXZ units, lowered IC rates, and, supposedly, weakened vibronic coupling between [3]LE and [3]CT states[54] (PXZ-PYR vs PXZ-muPYR and PXZ-mdPYR vs PXZ-2mPYR). In this case, the decrease in 3LE-3CT gaps for meta-methyl modified compounds PXZ-muPYR and PXZ-2mPYR probably was the cause of enhanced ISC and rISC rates,[11] though the exact mechanism still is debatable. The largest rISC rate (6.5 × 10–6 s–1) and, therefore, the most rapid TADF decay (0.8 μs) was estimated for PXZ-muPYR together with one of the largest ΦTADF (0.42) due to the largest krISC/kIC ratio. On the other hand, the weakened IC rate for PXZ-2mPYR allowed us to achieve the same TADF quantum yield together with a large enough rISC rate of 2.5 × 10–6 s–1 as for PXZ-muPYR having 45% more rapid radiative decay. However, the nonradiative decay still was strong for all compounds, resulting in ΦF way below 1.

The boost of the fluorescence quantum yield was achieved by embedding the TADF compounds into the solid PMMA polymer matrix in −O2 conditions. Although the rotational flexibility of the molecular structure already was reduced by the introduction of methyl groups, the additional suppression of structural relaxation in a more rigid surrounding eliminated the remaining nonradiative decay. Near-unity ΦF were observed for compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, and PXZ-mdPYR (0.92, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively). A somewhat lower ΦF of 0.72 was estimated for PXZ-2mPYR with the largest ΔEST.[41] For further solid-state TADF analysis, small-molecule host DPEPO (bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl) ether oxide) was selected due to the large triplet energy and larger polarity.[56] Similar to those of PMMA ΦF values were obtained for 10 wt % DPEPO (bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl) ether oxide) films, when, for example, a ΦF of 0.84 was estimated for PXZ-muPYR, comparable to that in PMMA within the measurement error. The more polar DPEPO surrounding favored more pronounced stabilization of CT energies, though the emission energies were slightly redshifted with respect to PMMA films (λFL = 515–542 nm; see Figure S30 in the Supporting Information).1CT-3LE gaps were also reduced to nearly zero for PXZ-PYR and PXZ-muPYR and 50–100 meV for PXZ-mdPYR and PXZ-2mPYR, respectively (see Figure S30 in the Supporting Information). Prompt fluorescence decay transients of 10 wt % DPEPO films of compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR in the −O2 surrounding (see Figure b) were similar to toluene solutions; however, the TADF decay was strongly multiexponential for compounds PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR due to the presence of conformational disorder (see Figure S31 in the Supporting Information for time-resolved spectra, showing temporal shifts of the emission peak).[37,52,56−61] Although no exact TADF lifetime and decay rates could be estimated, still the slowest TADF decay could be attributed for PXZ-2mPYR. On the contrary, an approximate three-exponential fit of fluorescence decay transient was successfully applied for PXZ-muPYR with the most rapid rISC in toluene,[37] though the latest DF decay tail (from about 10–5 to about 10–4 s) still was impossible to fit. Roughly, a solid-state TADF lifetime of only 860 ns was obtained, being one of the lowest among the ever reported for various TADF compounds[7,21,51,62] and especially for pyrimidine derivatives (see Table S2 in the Supporting Information).

To sum up, molecular structure modification by small methyl units is a powerful strategy for tunning of TADF properties. Later, the enhanced TADF decay rate together with a large fluorescence quantum yield will be shown to be essential for achieving highly efficient electroluminescence with low EQE roll-off.

Electroluminescence Properties

At the final stage, electroluminescence properties of phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR were elucidated (see Figure and Table ). Typical for similar phenoxazine–pyrimidine TADF compounds OLED structure was used:[24−26] indium tin oxide (ITO)/1,1-bis[(di-4-tolylamino)phenyl]cyclohexane (TAPC) (30 nm)/4,4′,4″-tri(N-carbazolyl)triphenylamine (TCTA) (5 nm)/10 wt % TADF emitter:DPEPO (bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl) ether oxide) (15 nm)/1,3,5-tri(m-pyridin-3-yl-phenyl)benzene (TmPyPB) (65 nm)/lithium fluoride (LiF) (0.8 nm)/Al (100 nm). However, contrary to the reports of similar phenoxazine–pyrimidine compounds,[24−26] the high triplet energy host DPEPO (ET = 3.3 eV[25]) was used rather than CBP with lower triplet energy (ET = 2.6 eV[25]) to efficiently confine triplet excitons (T1 = 2.72 eV) in the emissive layer. Neighboring compounds TCTA and TmPyPB were also selected to have larger T1 energies than of emitting compounds to assist the exciton confinement.[63,64]

Figure 5

(a) Voltage–current density and voltage–luminance curves of the OLEDs. (b) External quantum efficiency dependence on the luminance of the OLEDs. Inset: electroluminescence spectra of devices at a driving voltage of 9 V.

Table 3

Electroluminescence Properties of Phenoxazine–Pyrimidine TADF Compounds PXZ-PYR, PXZ-muPYR, PXZ-mdPYR, and PXZ-2mPYR

compounds	λEL (nm)a	VON (V)b	EQEc	PEMAX (lm/w)d	LMAX (cd/m2)e	CIE (x, y)f
PXZ-PYR	536	3.3	27.9/18.0/12.3	84.1	4214	(0.35, 0.56)
PXZ-muPYR	529	2.7	29.1/25.0/20.5	74.1	22730	(0.32, 0.55)
PXZ-mdPYR	514	2.5	27.5/21.0/16.0	75.2	7702	(0.27, 0.49)
PXZ-2mPYR	502	2.9	26.3/16.9/8.9	53.3	12476	(0.23, 0.42)

Electroluminescence peak wavelength.

Electroluminescence turn-on voltage.

External quantum yield. The order of measured values: maximum/at 100 cd/m2/at 1000 cd/m2.

Peak values of power efficiency.

Peak values of luminance.

Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage coordinates recorded at 9 V.

Electroluminescence (EL) spectra of all OLED devices (see the inset in Figure b) showed the emission only from the TADF emitter with no additional peaks from the host or neighboring materials. EL spectra peaked in the range of 502–536 nm. The alteration of the molecular structure allowed us to tune the EL peak wavelength from green, peaking at 536 nm for PXZ-PYR (CIE color coordinates of (0.35, 0.56)) to cyan for PXZ-2mPYR, peaking at 502 nm (CIE color coordinates of (0.23, 0.42)). EL turn-on voltages were in the range of 2.5–3.3 V, typically for OLEDs with a weakly electroactive DPEPO host.[65,66] The estimated peak values of power efficiency and luminance were in the range of 53.3–84.1 lm/W and 4214–22,730 cd/m2. Very high external quantum efficiency (EQE) values were obtained, being among the highest values for pyrimidine compounds (see Table S3 in the Supporting Information). Compound PXZ-muPYR with the most rapid rISC and near-unity fluorescence quantum yield showed a peak EQE of 29.1% for green electroluminescence without introducing any outcoupling enhancement technique, consistent with high ΦF values and considering a light extraction yield of 0.2–0.3[67] (though the presence of molecular alignment of rod-like molecules, enhancing the outcoupling, still is possible[59,68]). A weak EQE roll-off of about 30% was observed when the EQE decreased down to 20.5% at the practical luminance of 1000 cd/m2. A low EQE roll-off was achieved due to the short TADF lifetime of only 860 ns, weakening the EQE quenching by triplet–triplet and singlet–triplet annihilation at high luminance.[19,20] The combination of submicrosecond solid-state TADF lifetime and near 30% OLED EQE puts compound PXZ-muPYR among the most efficient TADF emitters (see Table S3 in the Supporting Information). Further optimization of EQE roll-off probably could be achieved by selecting a high T1 host layer with larger carrier drift mobilities.[69] Also, very large EQE values were obtained for compounds PXZ-PYR and PXZ-mdPYR with similar near-unity ΦF values, reaching 27.9 and 27.5%, respectively, though EQE roll-off was markedly larger due to the slower TADF decay. The lowest, though still large, peak EQE of 26.3% of cyan EL was estimated for compound PXZ-2mPYR with the lowest solid-state ΦF; however, the EQE roll-off was rather large (an EQE of 8.9% at the luminance of 1000 cd/m2) due to the largest TADF lifetime. Therefore, all the OLEDs with phenoxazine–phenylpyrimidine TADF emitters showed high EQE values, ranging from 26.3 to 29.1%, differing mainly by EQE roll-off, which was determined by the TADF lifetime.

Conclusions

In summary, we presented the synthesis, comprehensive analysis, and device application of a series of TADF compounds based on the phenoxazine–phenylpyrimidine structure with high TADF efficiency and rapid delayed fluorescence decay. The modification of the molecular structure with methyl groups at the acceptor unit was employed to tune the acceptor properties and donor–acceptor interaction, which were shown to have a significant effect on emission properties of TADF compounds. First, the introduction of ortho-methyl units was found to reduce the acceptor strength, resulting in enlarged 1CT-3LE energy gap and lowered rISC rate together with lowered TADF efficiency. On the contrary, the modification of the molecular structure with meta-methyl fragments was shown to be beneficial for enhancing the rISC rate up to 6.5 × 106 s–1 and shortening the TADF lifetime to 800 ns in toluene solutions. Lowering the 3LE-3CT energy gap was attributed as the nature of TADF enhancement. The modification of the phenoxazine–phenylpyrimidine molecular structure by introduction of both ortho- and meta-methyl units into the phenyl moiety was shown to lower the rISC rate and prolong TADF lifetime due to the enlarged 1CT-3LE energy gap; however, the weakened IC rate allowed us to achieve a very large TADF quantum yield. An enhanced fluorescence quantum yield, reaching near unity, was achieved after the insertion of compounds in solid films and elimination of remaining nonradiative decay, though the solid-state ΦF was slightly lower for compounds with both ortho- and meta-methyl units. Despite the ΦF enhancement, the unwanted conformational disorder appeared in solid films, resulting in multiexponential TADF decay transients, though the TADF decay of the meta-methyl modified compound was successfully approximated with the three-exponential model, and a decay time of only about 860 ns was estimated, being one of the lowest reported for TADF compounds. Although no solid-state TADF lifetime was possible to evaluate for the rest of compounds, still it was evident that the slowest decay was for the compound with both methyl units. Highly efficient green electroluminescence with weak EQE roll-off was obtained when the external quantum efficiency of OLEDs made of the compound with the shortest TADF lifetime peaked at 29.1%, and an EQE of 20.5% was observed at a practical luminance of 1000 cd/m2. Slightly lower peak EQE values of 27.1–27.5% with more pronounced EQE roll-off were obtained for compounds with slower TADF decay. Cyan EL with peak EQE of 26.3% was observed for ortho- and meta-methyl modified compounds with the shortest conjugation length, though the EQE roll-off was rather large due to the prolonged TADF decay.

Our results show that the fine-tuning of the TADF emitter structure by methyl groups enable the adjustment of the rISC rate, which directly controls the OLED performance at high current densities and enlarges the bandgap, which is favorable for the design of blue TADF emitters. Our insights, we believe, would be important for the optimization of TADF with compounds with diverse molecular structures.