Literature DB >> 32020739

The economic burden of kidney graft failure in the United States.

Jesse Sussell1, Alison R Silverstein1, Prodyumna Goutam1, Devin Incerti1, Rebecca Kee1, Corinna X Chen2, Donald S Batty2, Jeroen P Jansen1, Bertram L Kasiske3.   

Abstract

Despite improvements in outcomes for kidney transplant recipients in the past decade, graft failure continues to impose substantial burden on patients. However, the population-wide economic burden of graft failure has not been quantified. This study aims to fill that gap by comparing outcomes from a simulation model of kidney transplant patients in which patients are at risk for graft failure with an alternative simulation in which the risk of graft failure is assumed to be zero. Transitions through the model were estimated using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 1987 to 2017. We estimated lifetime costs, overall survival, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for both scenarios and calculated the difference between them to obtain the burden of graft failure. We find that for the average patient, graft failure will impose additional medical costs of $78 079 (95% confidence interval [CI] $41 074, $112 409) and a loss of 1.66 QALYs (95% CI 1.15, 2.18). Given 17 644 kidney transplants in 2017, the total incremental lifetime medical costs associated with graft failure is $1.38B (95% CI $725M, $1.98B) and the total QALY loss is 29 289 (95% CI 20 291, 38 464). Efforts to reduce the incidence of graft failure or to mitigate its impact are urgently needed.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32020739     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  7 in total

1.  Maintenance phase of a physical activity intervention in older kidney transplant recipients: A 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Tara O'Brien; Alai Tan; Karen Rose; Brian Focht; Reem Daloul
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.361

2.  A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Sonya Cressman; Louisa Edwards; Steven Shechter; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Paul Keown; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Effect of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Delayed Graft Function Following a Donation-After-Cardiac-Death Kidney Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Xi-Sheng Shan; Lin-Kun Hu; Yiqing Wang; Hua-Yue Liu; Jun Chen; Xiao-Wen Meng; Jin-Xian Pu; Yu-Hua Huang; Jian-Quan Hou; Xiao-Mei Feng; Hong Liu; Lingzhong Meng; Ke Peng; Fu-Hai Ji
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Impact of Extending Eligibility for Reinstatement of Waiting Time After Early Allograft Failure: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  S Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Joel T Adler; Sumit Mohan; Rimma Perotte
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 5.  Understanding and using AlloSure donor derived cell-free DNA.

Authors:  R K Seeto; J N Fleming; S Dholakia; B L Dale
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-07-18

Review 6.  BK Virus Infection and BK-Virus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Margherita Borriello; Diego Ingrosso; Alessandra Fortunata Perna; Angela Lombardi; Paolo Maggi; Lucia Altucci; Michele Caraglia
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Hypothermic Machine Perfusion as a National Standard Preservation Method for Deceased Donor Kidneys.

Authors:  Aukje Brat; Kirsten M de Vries; Ernst W E van Heurn; Volkert A L Huurman; Wim de Jongh; Henri G D Leuvenink; Arjan D van Zuilen; Bernadette J J M Haase-Kromwijk; Jeroen de Jonge; Stefan P Berger; Sijbrand H Hofker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.385

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.