Literature DB >> 32020651

Comparison of wheat, soybean, rice, and pea protein properties for effective applications in food products.

Hefei Zhao1, Chun Shen1, Zijian Wu1, Zhong Zhang2, Changmou Xu1.   

Abstract

Pea and rice proteins are promising to substitute allergenic proteins, and increasingly, play important roles in the food industry because of their hypoallergenic characteristics and nutritional value. However, manufacturers generally provide limited functionality information on these proteins. Therefore, this study comprehensively compared functional properties of wheat, soybean, rice, and pea proteins for their industrial applications and illustrated correlation among various functionalities. Results showed that protein solubility (PS) was highly related to its water absorption (WA) capacity, emulsifying activity index (EAI), and emulsion stability index (ESI). The overall functionality of pea protein was close to that of soybean protein while rice protein cannot match with all other proteins. sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis indicated the composition of each protein was unique. While the deconvolution of the amide I band of the Raman spectra indicated soybean and pea proteins that shared similar features, but they were different from that of wheat and rice proteins. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Due to the allergenicity of wheat and soybean proteins, food manufacturers are looking for alternative protein sources. Rice and Pea proteins are promising substitutes because of their "allergen-friendly" as well as their emergence in the food market. This study provided a comprehensive comparison of the functionality of commercially available wheat, soybean, rice, and pea proteins. The information presented in this study would be helpful to food scientists, scholars, or engineers when they develop appropriate application of various proteins in food products.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Raman spectrum; SDS-PAGE; functionality; protein; secondary structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32020651     DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Biochem        ISSN: 0145-8884            Impact factor:   2.720


  5 in total

1.  Physicochemical, Nutritional, Microstructural, Surface and Sensory Properties of a Model High-Protein Bars Intended for Athletes Depending on the Type of Protein and Syrup Used.

Authors:  Jan Małecki; Konrad Terpiłowski; Maciej Nastaj; Bartosz G Sołowiej
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Ingredients and Process Affect the Structural Quality of Recombinant Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Their Components.

Authors:  Di Zhao; Lu Huang; He Li; Yuqing Ren; Jinnuo Cao; Tianyu Zhang; Xinqi Liu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 3.  The Current Situation of Pea Protein and Its Application in the Food Industry.

Authors:  Parvathy Shanthakumar; Joanna Klepacka; Aarti Bains; Prince Chawla; Sanju Bala Dhull; Agnieszka Najda
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation.

Authors:  Xiaohu Zhou; Chaohua Zhang; Wenhong Cao; Chunxia Zhou; Huina Zheng; Liangzhong Zhao
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-07

5.  Extraction, Purification and In Vitro Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Phenolic Compounds in California Olive Pomace.

Authors:  Hefei Zhao; Roberto J Avena-Bustillos; Selina C Wang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.